Community - Forum - View old data

Categories :  

General Discussion

  Index

  • Op Conv ABing Seattle

    10. 22. 2005 06:40

panzer76
So, I thought I would try the Op Conv again. Thought the AB would be gone because of all the punishment handed out.

Well, the teams "balanced", in terms of ship types, but lo and behold.
On team B there were 6 Z99s vs 6 NDDs and "regular" DDs on A.

The Host was a newbie (nFF) and tabbed, so I stayed untabbed and asked them to balance their Z99s. I asked several times, and said otherwise it would amount to a AB game. None of them cared and NONE of them moved. These were also people in clans, and I would expect them to know better.

They also started to cry about banning all untabbed and me, becuase they didnt want to balance the game, they wanted their little AB game going.

The folowing Z99s players were involved in this:

hunus
MO - kam1
MO - toxicmolotow

and 3 others wich I didnt get a SS of.

Is this of the clans wants to operate, with members like this?
Is this ABing?

In the end, the host left, and the new host banned me for not tabbing.
  Index

  • Re : Op Conv ABing Seattle

    10. 22. 2005 12:25

lodder
hell i was in that game to and left becuase they all said that there Z(( had guns and crew and shit, and when the battle commensed they had the crate before we where past the isle.

and panzer in noticed your argument with this guys and i totally agree with you they are supposed to be players who now how this game works and now the opcan game is beeing f..........up, and that is the best way to get exp but starting a game that lasts for a hour and has one side walking al over the other because of the stuff that is said above just sucks.

pardon for my bad englisch.

  • Re : Op Conv ABing Seattle

    10. 22. 2005 12:11

Cretan
Ok what u saying is bad but not unbeatable.
Recently i was involved in one of those games were B-side had 5 Z99's ( all runners) and we had not 1. LOL what a situation to be in, especially on a 3X15 minute game.
Then team work came to place, we crippled them all by the time they had 2 boxes scored and then we scored 4 boxes. we won every round :)
Everything is beatable if you dont only focus on points and credits.

  • Re : Op Conv ABing Seattle

    10. 22. 2005 12:07

panzer76
And now, surprise, surprise, Im banned from MO games. I mean, thats how you handle it, isen't it? Some of your clan members participated in unsportmanship behaviour, and someone said so. Solution, ban them from the games. Sheesh... I have to add imature to the list I guess.

  • Re : Op Conv ABing Seattle

    10. 22. 2005 11:48

panzer76
Yes, I will agree that this is a stacked game, but to the point its highly likely one side will win (B).

What I find dissapointing is that clan members, who normally should know the game "rules" participiate, and indeed, sometime are the architect behind this kind of unsportmanship behaviour.

Already an other MO clan member has approached me and said thisi is untrue, but I have the SS and you could ask anyone on the A team atleast, that what I say is true.

  • Re : Op Conv ABing Seattle

    10. 22. 2005 10:28

molotowger
Hm i think thats a Stacked game, a AB game is when in B only a Fleet and in A a mix of non-fleet members and fleet-members.
And A have a dummy (most a FF).

  • Re : Op Conv ABing Seattle

    10. 22. 2005 09:46

Executor
call me a noob

but ..isnt there a difference between ab games and stacked games ?

  • Re : Op Conv ABing Seattle

    10. 22. 2005 09:06

coplice
yet nother SSF case
1