So if someone breaks the rules we should ignore it? I suppose that is okay until it
affects you personally? This is quite simple consistent application of break rules =
action from us to educate the person. If you want to know why the length of suspension
was chosen ask rehor who I explained it to last night and explained why it is actually
very lenient.

Locked.

What is the official reason given for their bans?

--"Can you please stop banning valued members for this sort of nonsense? It is just bad
business."--


Well this is SDE and their TNF "guard dogs" were talking about here. They havent made a
"good" business move since release.

Oh and unban Rehor.

Are you guys serious? You would think TNF would have better things to do then hand out
useless bans for stupid reasons. Oh wait they dont...

"Fresh Eyes" strike again! w00t

The so-called rules are obviously overridden when there is no defending fleet.

Priorities in the wrong place.

Unban him, don't be a douche.

I think it's more lulzy that SDE still hasn't considered a minimum member prerequisites
for fleets & squads; Or tag systems for that matter.

At Eliot,

rehor was banned for taking a harbor with his fleet. However,because his fleet is only 1 person, he. Has been
banned for this. Now the rules are quite clear here. An attacking fleet must have 30 members in order to not
Waste the Defending fleets time. Now, rehor declared on the harbor when the they were first reopened
meaning there was no defending fleet in the first place. So it is technically a sub-rule to protect current
harbor owners from fleets making futile attempts at a harbor.

I would post the link to the ticket rehor submitted, but that is not for me to decide if he wants the community
to see his ticket.

I don't think a ban was needed, but taking a harbor with one man was pretty
stupid. Now everyone else who wants to HA has to wait another week. As funny as
it was, it was a stupid move.

Can you please stop banning valued members for this sort of nonsense? It is just bad
business.