None of the intelligent people have problems with intelligent gamewinning tactics such as
CV humping. The problem arrives in the grey area of non-gamewinning tactics such as the
BWing you have mentioned.

I like to see players maximise their chances of winning games, BWing does not do this
because even the most skilled BW is a liability to his team as soon as he misses once.

Then again, we have had the BW debate and I won it concluding that people should just
scout for the good BBs and BW when I am not around :)

I'm not surprised that someone wants this banned.
Every time someone uses an alternative strategy (other then gunning) such as:
-HH at surface ships,
-torp whoring,
-bomber whoring,
-subs in general,
-now humping;
someone complains. What we all need to do is just calm down and accept that yes, there are
others ways to win. Find ways to beat these strategies, don't B**** about them and try to
have them banned. This is as immature as refusing to play with someone because they are
better then you

My favorite FF macro is:

"If I hump you will you respect me in the morning?"

LMAO at macro #5. I'll be sure to unleash a barrage of insults when you are the
enemy flag so you will retreat and give me the win.

Course CV humping should be allowed. If an FF+ manages to get *THAT* close to a CV
without it's team doing something about it, fair play and good luck to it.

I'm just curious how much damage you could do to a CV/group of CV's before the BB's
started paying attention however...

Bloodsky since you apparently know atleast a portion of the contents of the private
message alleging that humping was illegal. There was a second portion to that
private message alleging that I was harrassing a player or players by use of macros.

I have not changed my macros in months. The last time I changed them was after
the discussion in General Forum titled " BB Leechers " by Starluck.

Macro #1 " Please do not shoot the non-threat target Starluck is humping for Air!"

#2 "There can be only one..."

#3 " Feed me server merge. Feed the Star! "
#4 "Incoming bombers near Flagship spread the word!!!"
#5 "If anyone calls me a noob player in my CV5 then I will retreat..."


I dont see how the use of any of the above refrence macros could be considered as
harrassment, and each one has a specific time and use. 2 of the 5 are Victory Dance
Macros, 1 is saving Flagship information...

I dont like players being harrassed anymore then anyone else hence macro #5.

As a sub player that has just naviagated the Clint Eastwood Gauntlet to reach
enemey CV that has no defense, not even a TB, to think your not going to see any
of the macros?

To be harrassment there would have to repeated attempts or something that has
occurred more then one time to one particular person in more then one battle. I
have been a member for 7+ years with no compaints against me or with
Moderators. If there was harrassment I would have already been banned, but as
you can see I know what im speaking about. I feel pity for the people in real life
forced to spend their time answered support tickets regarding players emotional
feelings and how they been hurt in some way shape or form other then just being
sunk in battle.

Starluck, from what i have seen, the issue in your support ticket/PM that somebody
reported you for is NOT border humping, they reported you for harrassing people with
macros while humping. The harrassment is illegal, not humping.

I have provide Vick11 the required information. Since the threat was sent via
website message and from Team NF... No specific mod has been identified, but Im
sure Vick11 has access to whom sent the Team NF message to me....

Problem Solved other then informing the public at large that Humping is a legal and
viable tactic....

"'Fighter camp' would be the correct term there. Planes ain't gonna do any aerial
humping. =p "

Would this the same as the proverbial Flying ****?

Sorry, couldn't help it. If a CV lets themselves get humped, it's on them.