same here. 3 days sounds good. this should be moved to the suggestions forum.

It would also work out if you could switch squads as fast as you want, but after every
switch you cannot take part in HA for 4 days, and neither should you be able to use
anything related to HA (Rentables...).

This would remedy the situation for those who don't care about HA.

Oh, I thought this was another useless post whining about how long you got
banned....


But yes, 7 days is too much. I think 1 day is sufficient, but i will go with 3 if you guys
say so =D

doesnt fleet get 3 days warning before they are attacked?

just make it one more day than the warning...then they have no time to switch

yea i was thinking of 3 days too. 7 days... crazy TNF. 3 days is more than enough time to
prevent HA jumping.

According to common sense 7 days really is too much.

But arbitrary values are so much fun!

The original intention was to combat fleet jumping during HA. My opinion is that 3 days
should be enough, or even 1 day, so that a player can't jump to one fleet to help
assault/defend their harbor, and then jump to another one to assault/defend that one, and
then to the third one, and then back to his original fleet, all in one day.

how about just make it so fleet leaders can move their people between squads?

and allow the fleet leader to make the new squads and just assign them instead of
someone having to leave and make a new one