Community - Forum - View old data

Categories :  

General Discussion

  Index

  • video games are balance

    04. 03. 2011 21:34

vdub1
Video games are generally balanced, be it a clear definition of balance, or a fine line of
balance.

NF, has no balance-
cvs were once kings of the game, cvs used to play from the far ends of the map hunting
eachother down so bb's were easy game.
with the change of aa and fighter whores, there is no balance between the HUGE flock of
aaers with retardedly fast aa, not to mention the huge nerf on bomber aim. balance here is
tilted toward the bb group.

subs were added as a way to combat the trove of bb's, they just like cvs were nerfed due
to the huge outcry, balance was thrown out and huge imbalances such as hedge hogs were
added. scout depth charges would have been enough, but balance was shifted to the bb
player who removes aa, adds a aa escort (emden usually) and fits HH.

Cv vs Cv has turned into who can drag to get their fighters to shoot behind them, and the
fighter whores that use t4's on pcvs or cv6's. cvs have zero balance, the higher the level
the larger the gap between carriers are. cv1's and up to 3's have no chance against huge
carriers spamming lvl 120 t4 fighters. balance is non existant.

  Index

  • Re : video games are balance

    04. 04. 2011 00:43

ljsevern
You would think that after whining this long about CV's and been given lots of advice in his
threads, Vdub might actually have levelled past 100 and be remotely useful in CV.
Unfortunately, that is not the case.

  • Re : video games are balance

    04. 03. 2011 22:48

badman67
If you think bombers are inaccurate, please depend on that fact the next time you face
Ottaku's cv in battle. Perhaps a switch to manual bombing would help you.

  • Re : video games are balance

    04. 03. 2011 22:42

crazybrayden
if a BB6 gets sunk by a BB3 the BB6 is doing something wrong

if a CV6 is getting beat by a CV3 the CV6 is doing something wrong

while i agree with you that T4's are imbalanced , i dont think HH is a game breaking
weapon, and being able to drop depth charges from a scout would probably result in
BB's bombing FF/DD/CL with their scouts.

if your missing with 100 bombers your doing something wrong....

  • Re : video games are balance

    04. 03. 2011 22:15

Splid
"a bb3 with skill can take down a bb6, ive taken down a nebraska with a nagato..."

Congratulations, we all have at one point or another.

Guess what, killing a useless BB6 with your BB3 doesn't make BBs any more competitive, it
is a completely useless point to make.

USING ONE OFF SITUATIONS TO SUPPORT MY ARGUMENT WHEN THEY DON'T MAKE SENSE=WIN!

CAPS LOCK=WIN!

  • Re : video games are balance

    04. 03. 2011 22:13

Ewood
>>cv1's and up to 3's have no chance against huge carriers spamming lvl 120 t4
>>fighters

In a GB2 enviroment? Sure you do. You find the flag and sink it...
Unless you're talking about people stupid enough to go fighter Vs fighter against a
CV many times higher level than they are?

>>What makes you think in a level based game, a lvl 60 player should be able to
beat a >>lvl 120 player?

Have you SEEN some of the people in lvl 120 CV's?
>.>
<.<
^.^

CV's are fine, they are a 'game-winner' in GB2's (If I wasn't levelling new fighters I'd
be lvling my MN CV just bombing things) and a support class in GB1's/FW/HA's. In an
AW, they are what you want them to be.

CV's were kings when no-one had 900SD, or capped reps. Now thats become
commonplace, no, CV's cannot regularly kill BB's single-handed using one run of
bombers anymore, nor can you cripple one and expect it to still be there when your
next run arrives.

Use some common sense, kill the enemy CV's and then hunt hurt BB's to aid your
side best if you wish to BW, FW and kill crippled BB's/CV's when available using a
balanced set-up and help provide vision (note I didn't say be scout bitch) and kill
bombers/scouts when being a FW CV.

An umm, with regards to AA? most people with quad gold AA-whores just spray and
pray (and so losing planes is mostly bad luck) or use NF-fixer (i hate that program). I
can count on one hand the amount of people who worry me in an AA-ship

  • Re : video games are balance

    04. 03. 2011 22:03

vdub1
a bb3 with skill can take down a bb6, ive taken down a nebraska with a nagato...

a cv3 with skill will get eaten by a cv6 with t4 fighters...

  • Re : video games are balance

    04. 03. 2011 21:58

AlexCaboose
Thank you Splid. I'm glad I'm not the only one.

  • Re : video games are balance

    04. 03. 2011 21:54

Splid
Bombing (and all CV aspects) is about skill. If you launch 100 bombers and miss with all
100, that is more about crap DBing than DBer accuracy.

You are also wrong about the reason for the introduction of SSs.

You are also stupid to mention a CV3 having no chance against a CV6. So, not at all like
a BB3 vs a BB6 then? What makes you think in a level based game, a lvl 60 player should
be able to beat a lvl 120 player?

  • Re : video games are balance

    04. 03. 2011 21:50

vdub1
you can launch 100 bombers but if they all miss with the crap accuracy it dont matter on
load time...

  • Re : video games are balance

    04. 03. 2011 21:48

AlexCaboose
Bombers are inaccurate? I don't know if this is sarcasm or you're serious, but I'd say
the decrease on bomber load time has caused more imbalance.
1 2 3 4