CVs will have a great advantage in the time playing as they will spend less time waiting.
Also a good CV should have a higher win percentage then a good bb player.
So 50% of the categories should be won by cv players.

Anyone with a job doesn't have a chance. They should have had categories that promoted mass playing but only required 1 game to win. I remember playing mario kart ghost castle a thousand times or so just to improve my lap time. If there was a highest attack in a game per class then anyone could try and beat this, this would be much better.

I play far too much and I am not going to have a chance in this contest.

Gotta disagree with you on the better win % point. Just look at most "good" cv winrate, its normally around 55%.

Check good BB players, they are more on the 60-65% range.

Gotta agree CV spend less time waiting for a room tough.

Gotta disagree with you on the better win % point. Just look at most "good" cv winrate, its normally around 55%.

Check good BB players, they are more on the 60-65% range.

Gotta agree CV spend less time waiting for a room tough.

I'm mostly a CV/AA player on this account. I do have some BB stuff but mostly 120 US and 100ish KM cvs. I havent been playing alot of CV because BB teams have been very unreliable during events.

Why cant you get the most wins in a cv? I think if a good attack CV player like Arctic or Ottaku wanted to win the event for tonnage or exp they could do it easily.

Difference is a good BB has the mean to compensate a crap cv by his scouts and AA, reducing its effectiveness a bit, but will still manage to farm idiots. Unless a good cv is actively blinding him, the cv behind him will only make it easier or harder, but won't change the battle outcome.


CV on the other end cannot compensate for their idiots BB, safe a few TB Masters.

And even then. CVs can't hold the line. So they are far more dependant on their BBs than BBs to their CVs.

Which is why the 120 scouts screw over even good CVs.