I guess we can debate the merits of any non-KM SS4 vs KM SS4 but what requires no debate is that KM subs are OVERLY represented in games now. When there are 5 national subs and half of the subs present in any given game are KM then maybe, perhaps, possibly, there뭩 a balance issue at play?
Imagine if in nearly every GB2 game 10 of the 20 BBs present were USN BB5, or UK BB5, or IJN BB5, etc etc. Would this not be a cause for questioning the balance implications of such an overly represented unit? I certainly think so.
What I really want to know is if SDE continues to expand the national SS lines is it their intention to keep the KM line as the highly favored national line? Personally I don뭪 think we need more powerful subs nor PSS units that just have more DP, more torps, more speed, more tubes, etc etc. If the SS5s or PSS had new and unique abilities then I could see that. The ability to drop mines, non-cash smoke screens, scout launching ability, sonar ping ability that reveals hidden units in the fog of war, ,etc etc. Then I might be in favor of that as long as it doesn뭪 just increase the raw power of the SS line.
As for KM subs being just as easy to duel as other subs I have to disagree. The KM SS4 has plenty of bow and stern tubes, great speed, powerful torps, small silhouette, and essentially don뭪 have any drawbacks such as no stern tubes or long reloading times. Therefore the KM SS4 is already a decent boat before you toss in a reduced submerge/critical dive time, proximity torps that have a 91% detonation rate, and the most powerful SS deck gun.
If going forward SDE is looking to intentionally balance national subs with this formula: KM SS > Non-KM SS. I just want to know that so I can decide now whether I want to continue down a SS line that will always be designed to be inferior to my other options.
|