Community - Forum - View old data

Categories :  

Marine Nationale

  Index

  • NFNA MN FP fuel capasity VS NFKR,NFEU & NFRU

    05. 22. 2010 23:30

SylverXI
I was looking at the fuel capasity of the French fighters. I noticed immediately that
the fuel capacity was far lower for the MN fighters than normal relative to the other
nations.

I later decided to see if this was also the case in the other servers. I was surprised
to find out that the other server had values that made the MN fp fuel capacity well
balanced with the fuel capacity of the other nations.

Now my question is this: "why does NFNA still has NFKR values, making MN FP's fuel
capasity drasticlly more inferior relative to the other nations?"

I made some screenshots of the fuel capacity values:
NFNA
NFEU

NFRU

NFKR

The only server that had the same value of that of NFNA was NFKR, the only diffrence
is that ALL the servers have well balanced values for their fuel capacity of the diffrent
nations.

EXAMPLE NFKR T3 FP's
US----> Fuel capacity: 99
UK----> Fuel capacity: 97
IJN----> Fuel capacity:104
KM----> Fuel capacity: 97
MN----> Fuel capacity: 99
So the values are well balanced!

EXAMPLE NFNA T3 FP's
US----> Fuel capacity: 139
UK----> Fuel capacity: 134
IJN----> Fuel capacity: 144
KM----> Fuel capacity: 136
MN----> Fuel capacity: *99*
THE VALUES ARE NOT BALANCED FOR MN!!!!

THESE ARE ONLY THE VALUES FOR THE FUEL CAPACITY, OTHER STATS SUCH AS
SPEED, DP ETC. ARE ALSO NON-BALANCED.
  Index

  • Re : NFNA MN FP fuel capasity VS NFKR,NFEU & NFRU

    06. 19. 2010 16:51

TimmyC
On the other hand, check out the scouts ^^ Shockingly long flight times!

  • Re : NFNA MN FP fuel capasity VS NFKR,NFEU & NFRU

    06. 16. 2010 22:44

straswa
So, does this mean the chance of seeing a fix for the fighters is slim?

Oh well, guess I better bomb more with my Dixmude. At the very least, we still have
locals to provide FC, albeit limited.

  • Re : NFNA MN FP fuel capasity VS NFKR,NFEU & NFRU

    06. 12. 2010 12:58

richardphat
You got about 1min40s for T2 and 1min50s for T3 planes before they crash in the ocean.
It is useable, but you will requiere to send constantly fightes .

Regular T3 fighters have about ~2min20-30s of flight time.

  • Re : NFNA MN FP fuel capasity VS NFKR,NFEU & NFRU

    06. 12. 2010 08:35

jhempsrt4
Actually, because of those stats, MN CV's are the only ones I want to play.

  • Re : NFNA MN FP fuel capasity VS NFKR,NFEU & NFRU

    06. 11. 2010 16:40

Morrighan
You can't play a team CV without offering your team-mates at least some Fighter Protection
and Scouting. The Fighters need at least 15-20 extra fuel to make them okay.
This doesn't over-power them it just levels things up they'd still be worse than other
nations.

I'd gladly take a slight nerf on the DB's to get the Fighters running properly.

Being reduced to the equivalent of a local plane CV, and having your planes continually
running out of fuel gets old real fast.

I'm absolutely sure this discourages would-be MN CV captains.
FIX IT

  • Re : NFNA MN FP fuel capasity VS NFKR,NFEU & NFRU

    06. 03. 2010 19:56

SaddleRocker
No, because they werent fragile.

Now they are, so now there balanced, right?

I mean i wasnt happy about MN Planes either, but its not that bad, as long as you
realize it, and dont level FP.
If you want balanced planes, you have 4 other nations to choose from. If you want
an uber BW CV, MN is where its at

  • Re : NFNA MN FP fuel capasity VS NFKR,NFEU & NFRU

    06. 03. 2010 19:24

Eradicator1
"Super awsome bombers and pitiful fighters does balance itself out in my book."

That's like saying subs were balanced before because they have massive torp damage but
"were fragile"

  • Re : NFNA MN FP fuel capasity VS NFKR,NFEU & NFRU

    06. 03. 2010 19:16

SaddleRocker
I understand, MN is not Balanced,

But it is what it is, so again, dont go MN if you want fighters. But if you want an
awsome BW CV, then MN is awsome for that.

Super awsome bombers and pitiful fighters does balance itself out in my book.

  • Re : NFNA MN FP fuel capasity VS NFKR,NFEU & NFRU

    06. 01. 2010 20:52

V2CxBongRipz
"It gives you some variety, some change"

Typical TNF, SDE is always right instead of understanding what the real problem is.

  • Re : NFNA MN FP fuel capasity VS NFKR,NFEU & NFRU

    06. 01. 2010 18:39

HarryTokus
Saddle is right

Bomberwhores + gb2 = great!
1 2