Community - Forum - View old data

Categories :  

U.S Navy

  Index

  • Possible USN additions / fixes

    06. 16. 2010 12:07

Redrok
Haven't seen any suggestions really for USN. What are your thoughts?
My list would kinda start like so:
1: USN AA
2: Make our insane AAW worth something to higher level planes.
3: Maybe some tweaks to armor or range?

Throw out some general USN player "WANTS".
  Index

  • Re : Possible USN additions / fixes

    07. 07. 2010 21:48

xhero24x
CV BALANCE! we have BB6's and we can't do crap against them.

  • Re : Possible USN additions / fixes

    07. 07. 2010 18:27

Megadone
Take current MN AA guns/gunners and give them to US.
Take Current US AA guns/gunners and give them to MN.

AA solved...

as for Cv's....meh it's 3 AM not gona bother with em now -.-
all so Hero...US doesn't have Best or 2nd Best BB? What do you call Nebby?

thats all :)

cheers
Megadone

  • Re : Possible USN additions / fixes

    07. 07. 2010 10:24

Teddyyoo
Actually, the Seydlitz and DG were both planned to be converted to carriers.

  • Re : Possible USN additions / fixes

    07. 07. 2010 06:48

GordonRamsay
"I would like to see US CV's upgraded with P-51 mustangs as fighters since the KM CV has
the fw190 as a fighter which they didn't have in WWII the US F4U corsair"


The Germans had upgraded Bf-109 carrier variants for the GrafZep. If they would have
actually had a prolonged war, the FW-190 torp bomber variant(Fw 190 F-8/U2&U3) would have
probably been used on their fledgling carrier fleet---or maybe replaceing or supplementing
the BF109's at the time.

Mustangs never served EVER in the US CV fleet and they never planned to use them---and
besides, there are plently of historical USN aircraft to legitimately choose from

It is believable due to the pseudo-historical accuracy of this game that if Germany ever
completed their Z-projects it probably would have happened....since they were still using
Bi-plane torp bombers at the time.


maybe if you want P-51's on carriers we could always tell the KM players to shove it and
take away all their CV's except the GZ.

  • Re : Possible USN additions / fixes

    07. 07. 2010 06:35

GordonRamsay
1. GIVE US THE DAMN GATO
2. wouldn't mind seeing the introduction of 1.1quad "chicago piano's" to rival pompoms.
Might actually be worthwile putting them for the useless AA-Sailor class.

  • Re : Possible USN additions / fixes

    07. 07. 2010 04:16

Baker654
Well I don't now what Fighters to give the other nations except for the Kawanishi N1K-J
for the Japanese. Make the N1K-J the tier 4 fighter and move the J7W Shinden to tier 5.
For the subs at the moment give the German the type IX U-boat. Sorry I don't know what to
give the other nations

  • Re : Possible USN additions / fixes

    07. 06. 2010 22:13

Teddyyoo
You can't give one nation T4(which is I assume what you meant) fighter and SS5 without giving the others the
same.

  • Re : Possible USN additions / fixes

    07. 06. 2010 20:28

Baker654
Even though I a play as the Royal Navy, I do have a few additon suggestions for the US Navy.

1:Add the Bearcat as the 5th tier fighter for the US. The Bearcat, would be incredibly
fast and agile. Also beacuse they are so small Large Carriers can carry a lot of them.
However their firepower would be limited to 4 .50 Browing Machine guns so their attack
would be slightly weaker than the Hellcat.
2: Give the US a tier 5 submarine. The Gato class would ideal for this as the US
desperately needs a decent Sub.

I know a lot of people are going to hate these suggestions. But hey at least they are
suggestion to make the US more enjoyable

  • Re : Possible USN additions / fixes

    07. 06. 2010 07:36

The13thDevil
"I think
the US-IJN-KM are balanced very well...i cant speak to MN too much but think they need an
AA nerf, and UK needs some serious nerfing in several areas, as do subs of all nations. "


Before you saying this and that needing a nerf.. How about you try playing all the nations
BB line first and experiencing it for yourself..

  • Re : Possible USN additions / fixes

    07. 06. 2010 00:11

horse91
pretty much just get rid of US AA gunner branch. i mean really, who uses em now
anyway? ppl just go reload reload instead. i'd also say to allow sodak to mount fcs II at
least, it's ridiculous that it cant. so the spread isnt as crap as it is. ( partly because
sodak is my next ship hehe) but seriously its a bb3, come on now.
1 2 3 4