I have seen several MN Cvs with T3 fighters. Their T3 fighters are good against
other nations, they balance up well in a dog fight. The only problem with all MN
fighters is that they have significantly less fuel time.

For example T3 KM fighters have about 2 mins 30 sec fuel time and MN only have
about 1 minute 50 second fuel time.

If they increased fuel time to a bit more on MN T3 fighters a lot more MN cvs will use
them, some of them still do.

MN CVs are good, expecially at bombing since, if properly done at higher levels can
one shot bomb any ship, even BB6s.

Says who? I havent seen a single MN CV with T3 fighters yet. Yet people say MN CVs are
bomberwhores. Stats dont say everything.

As Sonlirain put it, MN CVs are best used in the attack role. An advantage though of
the French carriers is all of them have armnament slots. Even the CV1 Dixmude,
which is very similar to the CV1 Bogue.

So if you like bombers, MN is for you.

MN CVs are strictly bomberwhores.
Their bombs and TB torps do about 20% more damage than their counterparts. The fighters
are powerfull (More or less like KM) but have VERY little fuel so they can only help the
CV in case of incoming bombers or fightercampers and are useless for forming CAPs.
Also their bombers have near unlimited fuel.