"they can make a ECV4

a cv that can launch 9 aircrafts like CV4, but have more space to transport aircrafts,
and
have 4 or 5 guns.. than u cah put AA or HH as you like.. i think its a good idea.. "
Agreed

ECV6-overpowered
ECV5->powerful, but not to the point of overpowerment
ECV4->balanced
ECV3->can compete, but a little underpowered
ECV2->underpowered
ECV1->so underpowered, no one will know they are there

The ECV4 for USN could be USS Enterprise, cause we all know how many times thats
been suggested

Also ,in addition to the quote above, improved AAW but lower DP to balance.
Mabye 13500->15500

Recc

accept the event are only for BB's,stop to dream is morning.

My idea for the event carries are the following ships, however only the original 4 nations
will get ECV's the French will miss out

US: Enterprise (Yorktown class)
UK: Glorious (Courageous class)
IJN: Soryu (Soryu class (the Hiryu was a sister ship)
KM: Aqulia (an Italian carrier converted from a cruise vessel)

I really love this idea!

@zxcalvaryxz

well after MN bb6 and cv6 are patched we will see how well *players* can balance
ships.....

as for this suggestion....it was all ready edited.....

if suggestion was made as *SDE make ECV for us players to balance*

I would of suggested it...but it wasen't...and editing OP is just stupid
if OP has a diferent idea regarding ECV he should make new post instead of
constant editing OP -.-

cheers
Megadone

any new and BALANCED content is more then welcomed, however 80% of SDE *new
content* is NOT balanced...eaven the original 4 nations are not yet balanced
properly....

thus the point of having THAT KIND of new content is a NO NO

balanced yes, and welcomed
broken no, not welcomed

reason why I don't support a ECV is cuz EBB's IMO ther not balanced...

cheers
Megadone

How are the pcvs not balanced? but i will agree with you on the fact that the 4
original nations are unbalanced and NM just made it worse.

But, heres an idea, allow them to make a new ECV, before its implemented in-
game, SDE posts the ECV's Specifications on the fourms and the players can decide
for themselves if it will cause any further imbalance to the game.

Instead of shooting down new ideas, how about we accept the idea, but We The
Players and payers fix the idea in (terms of armament,Level,aircraft spacing ETC...)
and decide for ourselves if the new ships are suitable for implementation without
causing another huge imbalance to NF.

Dude I fricken' agree with Megadone :))

BALANCE IT FIRST BEFORE YOU GIMME NEW STUFF YES??

If your complaining so much that nations are OPed, why don't you choose that nation?

i love this idea it would be great :)

@freedomx192

if PCV gets nerfed to where it SHOULD BE aka PBB lvl...ther requirement lvl would all
so drop...it would NO stay at 103

:D

@zxcalvaryxz

any new and BALANCED content is more then welcomed, however 80% of SDE *new
content* is NOT balanced...eaven the original 4 nations are not yet balanced
properly....

thus the point of having THAT KIND of new content is a NO NO

balanced yes, and welcomed
broken no, not welcomed

reason why I don't support a ECV is cuz EBB's IMO ther not balanced...

cheers
Megadone