Hi again. I just wanted to point some things out.
-Russia
1) There appears to only be one remodellable ship. Methinks it needs moar. The
other nations have lots of remodels.
2) Also, a LARGE number of Russian ships in NF are badly outdated for the WWII
period- for example, Pallada and Rurik were sunk by the Japanese in the Russo-
Japan War of 1904-1905. That's clearly too old. Perhaps we should remedy this.
3) Russia needs a PCL. I'd buy it for sure. XD
4) I noticed that the USSR only goes to CV5 in it's CV line. o___0
5) The sprite designers got lazy- these ships are all designed based on graphics
ripped from other existing NF ships!
6) Only 4 Subs? Other nations go to SS5 already.
-In general
1) I think that the Neutral Nation should have a Frigate-Z. Not just because there's
an X and a Y, but because it'd be cool to have a FFZ with AA Pom Poms. That sounds
like a cool escort ship, especially for those who don't go with UK's Emerald Class
ship.
2) Actually, you should be able to have a Pom-Pom style rapid-AA for every nation. It
would make training for AA usage easier for US, USSR, MN, KM, and IJN players. As
far as I'm aware only the Brits get them for ships. I've heard the Germans can have
them on a submarine but I still don't play Germany NOR submarines. As do other
people.
3) Now that I mention AA... The USN's guide lines for AA should be universal. It
doesn't make sense for only the US to use them.
-IJN (mostly naming issues to be fixed)
1) Remove "Kai" from Akitsuki and Kuma remodels. "Kai" in Japanese is short
for "Kaizou" which means modified, but this term was NOT applied to capital ships
such as these in the Kaigun.
2) Tsukikei... Oh God, don't get me started. "Tsukikei" does not exist in the Japanese
language. They should perhaps rename it. EDIT: Also, my previous point about the
Tsukikei was that the other fake ships in this game were really designed or planned
but never built. For example the Russian ship Sovetzky Soyuz was really
planned. "Super Yamato", as this game calls it, was really designed as well, but the
IJN gave up on the project. (Read about it below, the real name was "Design A-150,
Muteki Nippon")

) Tatsuda should be "Tenryu"- NF seems to be naming ships by their class, and
Tenryu was the lead ship of this class. Tatsuda was built later.
4) "Simakaze" is incorrect. I am studying the Japanese language, and they do NOT
have the "si" sound. It should be "Shimakaze".
5) Hiryu should be "Soryu"... Soryu was the lead ship in her class, and as I said
before, it's about consistancy. NF names most of its ships by class, but Hiryu was not
the class name.
6) The De Grasse probably doesn't fit as an IJN CV6. It is a German concept, and the
Germans never could have sold any of this sort of thing to Japan. Even in a
hypothetical situation, they simply couldn't do that, due to the sheer distance
between their two territories, and the fact that the US would get in the way if they
tried it. I think perhaps another papership would do fine here. Maybe just rename it.
7) Donburi is not a Japanese WWII ship. It belonged to the Royal Thai Navy. I think
that it's still a good ship and should not be removed, but perhaps a rename would
be nice. I still love this ship, as I can put over 18" of belt armour on it and run into
blitz. People's reactions are the funniest when they see me bounce 8" shells on that
tinny little ship. XD
8) The "Super Yamato" was the attributed name to a project called A-150. The
AMERICANS named it Super Yamato, not the Japanese. The IJN actually planned to
call it "Muteki Nippon".
-USA
Nothing to say here, as I've never played as the US Navy in NF, so I don't have any
firsthand experience to note.
-France
1) They ALSO appear to only have 5 CVs. -.-
2) As with Russia, all the MN ships are all copied or modified from other NF sprites.
I'd appreciate some original design work, as I've heard others voice complaints
about this. I.E.: Reynaud looks like an Emden Clone, etcetera.

I'll come back with more as I go, folks, but I'm outta time for now.
Cuda