Community - Forum - View old data

Categories :  

General Discussion

  Index

  • False complaints = temporary ban for the complainer?

    05. 31. 2011 15:41

Starluck
Greetings,



I submit that any player that submits a complaint that is investigated by a
Moderator and the conclusion that the player doesnt know the rules should result in
a temporary ban to teach these people to read all the rules on game play and forum
posting.

My reasons why:

#1 I have been threatend by one game mod humping ships with my sub.

#2 I have been threated by one game mod for asserting that Fleet Team NF
players are consideredc a priority target and we enjoy sinking them.

#3 I have multiple players complain and threatend to have me banned every time
I hump a ship for air in my submarine. I am forced to defend myself and screen
capture the text chat exchange incase #1 and/or #2 happen again. Even mods
have to learn the rules. Precise/exact rules addressing every situation has not yet
been concluded and are under developement, but humping has been precisely
defined as legal any/which/way you can manage it.

#4 I notice that every time an issue regarding humping is brought up including the
use of border humping with planes and ships, the post get locked because the issue
has been settle years ago yet there is no effort or way to force every player to learn
and acknowledge all the rules resulting in false complaints which are sometimes
taken seriously by game mods.

#5 Players attempt to turn posts in to player bashing, or trying to go off topic.
There is a brand new set of rules the forum moderators must follow. These new
rules coorelated to the fact that players either dont know the rules or refuse to
follow them.

Question: Why should players whom follow all the rules undergo player bashing, in
game threats and harrasment simply because players dont know the rules. Its ok to
disagree with the rules, but not know the rules is no excuse to attack other players
regardless of which rules you disagree with this would include the follow:

BBs without Scouts
CVs without Fighters
Ships humping the borders
Aircraft humping the borders
BBs with smaller guns
Submarines humping ships without guns or HH to defend themselves
  Index

  • Re : False complaints = temporary ban for the complainer?

    06. 03. 2011 06:19

nyerkovic
Since this entire thread has been off-topic (temporary ban for false complaints) I will
lock it. To clean off-topic comments we would have to clean 7 pages.

I was letting this thread develop before closing it as we stated in the guidelines above,
but since page one it hasn't come back to the original topic and now its going to
develop as hearsay between players of what they are and aren't doing. Even the OP
has contributed to go in another direction and isn't providing arguments to the original
topic centering all the comments on CV humping and it's rules.

As stated by TNF in this thread, humping other ships is legal so there is the end of that
discussion and this thread.

Also, although it has been a rough discussion everyone have presented their
differences without insulting anyone, some might not like the answers they get but
that's another issue.

  • Re : False complaints = temporary ban for the complainer?

    06. 03. 2011 05:48

Starluck
I am seeing allegations made directly against me. If your allegations of harrassment
were true, then why has the only one one complaint/ticket ever filed against me
since 1996.

Why do you come onto my posts and provide nothing productive to the topic at
hand, and start making false allegations with not proof or screen shots. Forum
Moderator's are suppose to follow new rules which include removing your flaming
post, off-topic posts.

What I do in-game when someone continiously harrasses me. My method of
handeling in-game flamers is different from forum flamers. I think forum moderators
should handle the forum problem.

How to stop in-game harrassment or violation of any rule.

#1 Use text chat and call the player out by name, and announce exactly what rule
is being broke.

#2 I ask other players to confirm or look for violation. I ask them to stop, and if
they continue I threaten to file a ticket resulting in game ban.

#3 I have never made it past step 2 because players listen when rules are
verablized and screen shots have taken place along with other witnesses.


So has this not occurred resulting in a ban for me? The answer is I haven't broken
any rules and your allegations of harrasment, not sinking the CV even after full of air
is false. Your off topic, and you have provided nothing relavent to this post.

I call upon the forum moderator's to do their job and remove your post, and send
you a private message informing you of your violation of forum rules. My goodness
don't you even know enough about loopholes to avoid forum ban? All you had to do
was place anything else in your post that was relavant and it might have passed the
subjective criteria that has allowed other posts to slip through.

There are players that are both for against my methods. Regardless what rules NF
might implement, I shall remain the one and only SS-Superstar. I follow the rules
and you never see me player bash. I never call players out by name, I only bring up
issues that effect the general public.

As I said before, I have never filed a ticket and probley never will espcially since
there appears to be no uniformity regarding moderators and which rules they
enforce.

  • Re : False complaints = temporary ban for the complainer?

    06. 02. 2011 13:01

Elliot2lazy
You admit to 1) being a consistant submarine driver and 2) humping a cv with your submarine.

  • Re : False complaints = temporary ban for the complainer?

    06. 02. 2011 11:36

cena200
"Submarines humping ships without guns or HH to defend themselves "

This is actually against the rules, if a ship "CAN NOT" fit guns (E.g. some cvs can not)
then these ships are not allowed to be humped.. if they can, but choose not to, then
it is their problem.

  • Re : False complaints = temporary ban for the complainer?

    06. 02. 2011 06:25

ConnectFour
i think the issue here is starluck thinks hes super elite because humping requires 'skill'
and the fact nobody is doing it is because its soooo hard and nobody but him is skilled
at doing it in a ss. Because hes so good, he makes it look easy. He likes to show off his
skills a little and let everyone know by taunting the enemy, even after his air is full. The
opposing team doesnt like this so they call him a noob which he doesnt like, so he tries
to defend this awesome tactic that hes so skilled at. Of coarse he gets reporta, and
now he comes crying to the forumz.

  • Re : False complaints = temporary ban for the complainer?

    06. 02. 2011 03:16

ljsevern
"How do you know starluck is humping just to get TKd and so he can report someone?
have you ever seen a FF rush past the BB line and hump the flag? you know why he
does that? so he doesnt get blockshooted by enemies. if he didnt hump, everyone
whould kill him. seen it many times with FF and SS.

Seems to me like thats a lot of effort just to get random people banned."

>>> The difference between an FF doing that and an SS is that he doesn't attack the CV in
his SS, and he also taunts everyone in open chat while doing it. He carries on doing it even
after his air is full. If you actually watched the incidents, then you would know exactly what
goes on.

Besides, lol, he is in an overpowered sub; He shouldn't need to hump CV's.

  • Re : False complaints = temporary ban for the complainer?

    06. 01. 2011 18:20

silentsubusa
How do you know starluck is humping just to get TKd and so he can report someone?
have you ever seen a FF rush past the BB line and hump the flag? you know why he
does that? so he doesnt get blockshooted by enemies. if he didnt hump, everyone
whould kill him. seen it many times with FF and SS.

Seems to me like thats a lot of effort just to get random people banned.

  • Re : False complaints = temporary ban for the complainer?

    06. 01. 2011 18:00

AlexCaboose
Ok, looked like you were calling for the opposite. Glad that's clarified now

  • Re : False complaints = temporary ban for the complainer?

    06. 01. 2011 17:50

sparximus3
"Wouldn't you rather the same standards be applied across all servers? Speaking as
a player, not a monitor, I'd much rather have rules that are enforced the same way
on both servers. "

i would, however thats not the case, sadly

if there was a universal set of rules for any circumstance that were enforced and followed
by all of TNF, then this community wouldnt have such a negative view of TNF.

thats all i am saying.

  • Re : False complaints = temporary ban for the complainer?

    06. 01. 2011 17:05

AlexCaboose
none of this would be a problem if mods werent allowed to communicate with reach
other
from different servers, and didnt know WHO the other mods were......
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Wouldn't you rather the same standards be applied across all servers? Speaking as
a player, not a monitor, I'd much rather have rules that are enforced the same way
on both servers.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7