Categories :

Soviet Navy

KM vs SN
03. 30. 2011 05:39

Konstanza	Which advantages do soviets have against KM regarding BB s ? (even if you compare CV and SS s.. KM is far superior) Answer = None Km.. better gun range Km.. much better AA Km.. better speed Km.. better torps (plus proxy) Km.. better ship turning forces Km.. better gunners Km... better ship defence Km... better spread (You would say soviets have a bit more damage, ok who would want %5-10 more damage instead of all these specs and more ?) I think soviets need serious buffs to be more unique.. at the moment there seems nothing charming about them to play... I think soviets need to have more range than KM to balance bad turning force... it is written soviets have good range.. it is really not that obvious... low tier soviet ships maybe... but most play bb in the end...

Konstanza

Which advantages do soviets have against KM regarding BB s ?
(even if you compare CV and SS s.. KM is far superior)

Answer = None

Km.. better gun range
Km.. much better AA
Km.. better speed
Km.. better torps (plus proxy)
Km.. better ship turning forces
Km.. better gunners
Km... better ship defence
Km... better spread

(You would say soviets have a bit more damage, ok who would want %5-10 more
damage instead of all these specs and more ?)

I think soviets need serious buffs to be more unique.. at the moment there seems
nothing charming about them to play...

I think soviets need to have more range than KM to balance bad turning force... it is
written soviets have good range.. it is really not that obvious... low tier soviet ships
maybe... but most play bb in the end...

Re : KM vs SN
03. 30. 2011 08:54

sc00tti	LOL he's actually whining about SN. how about CL sized bb3, hitting like a bb5? 12"guns going through 10" deck of uk armor like it wasnt even there?

Re : KM vs SN
03. 30. 2011 07:19

Konstanza	"10 - 15%? Where did you come up with that figure?" per shell damage difference is not drastic I wanted to stress that.... (soviet bb6 s damage is a joke against charlemagne) and there is not much difference in durability either... they both dont change gameplay very effectively... if you compare with speed, range, much better aa, turning force and so on soviets by far seems to be the less unique nation.. having nothing special at all... even they were told to have long range.. they are outranged by KM as if KM does not have enough unique abilities... KM wins in that too

Konstanza

"10 - 15%? Where did you come up with that figure?"

per shell damage difference is not drastic I wanted to stress that.... (soviet bb6 s
damage is a joke against charlemagne)
and there is not much difference in durability either...
they both dont change gameplay very effectively... if you compare with speed, range,
much better aa, turning force and so on

soviets by far seems to be the less unique nation.. having nothing special at all...

even they were told to have long range.. they are outranged by KM as if KM does not
have enough unique abilities... KM wins in that too

Re : KM vs SN
03. 30. 2011 06:57

Asbuster	SN does more damage per shell SN can take more damage Theres 2 points SN has better. Unless ofcourse someone can convince me otherwise.

Re : KM vs SN
03. 30. 2011 06:42

jhempsrt4	10 - 15%? Where did you come up with that figure?

Re : KM vs SN
03. 30. 2011 05:54

Tyefen	While they are at it, if they'd just buff the UK since the situation seems vaguely similar, as it is so underpowered - I might just play that line too!

1 2

Categories : Game News & Updates General Discussion Off-Topic Test Server Discussion Tip and Tactics Technical Support Suggestions Trade and Bater U.S Navy Royal Navy Imperial Japanese Navy Kriegsmarine Marine Nationale Soviet Navy

Soviet Navy

KM vs SN 03. 30. 2011 05:39

Re : KM vs SN 03. 30. 2011 08:54

Re : KM vs SN 03. 30. 2011 07:19

Re : KM vs SN 03. 30. 2011 06:57

Re : KM vs SN 03. 30. 2011 06:42