Categories :

General Discussion

You guys might wanna have a look at this.
05. 16. 2011 08:34

Audessy	Mailman posted: "Pending prioposal WIP (may 8th) 05 8 2011 1:27AM MN/SN Change request #6 Ships: Please change all speeds without touching the displacements: SN BB Imperatritsa Mariya: base speed: +1 knot SN BB Gangut: base speed +2 knots SN BB Andrei Pervozvanny: base speed: +1 knot MN BB Strasbourg: T space (small): 93 -> 86 MN PBB Dunkerque (MN): T slots (large): 118 -> 153 MN PBB Dunkerque (MN): T slots (small): 74 -> 86 MN ECL Reynaud: R space : 71 -> 70 MN PCL Gamelin: R space: 127 -> 153 MN APA Belfort: R space: 59 -> 70 MN EBB Danton: T space: 121 -> 174 MN EBB Le Havre: T space: 85 -> 86 IJN BB Amagi: armor weight: 301 -> 790 US BB Nebraska: armor weight: 283 -> 690 KM BB Kaiser: armor weight: 319 -> 760 MN PCV Daladier: Base speed: +2 knots MN CV Arromanches: Base speed: +2 knots Guns: MN Lvl 120 x4 18.89"/45 cal Model 1945: accuracy: -1 SN Lvl 110 x3 16"/50 B-37 Pattern 1937: Change range so that it is slightly below the SN Lvl 100 x4 16?Vickers Pattern A (do this first) SN Lvl 100 x4 16?Vickers Pattern A: Change range so that it is equal to the US Lvl 100 x3 16"/50 cal Mark 7 Mod 1 (do this second) SN Lvl 110 x3 16"/50 B-37 Pattern 1937: Required Level: 110 -> 100 SN Lvl 100 x4 16?Vickers Pattern A: Required Level: 100 -> 110 ---- notes: The speed changes are to compensate for the loss of speed due to the displacement changes last week. The BB6 gun accuracy was accidentally raised twice (my mistake, I copied a previous request and forgot to take it out), therefore a small nerf is needed. Not sure if this is enough. SN BB5 changes as discussed in the topic about teh SN BB5 " Original link http://www.navyfield.com/board/view.asp?Num=194830&Sort=C07&Order=re_upday&PageSize=20&Page=1&SearchPart=&SearchText=&Ctg_1=&Ctg_2=&Ctg_3=&Mode=ok&Page2=3 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- My thoughts: I am very skeptical of what's going on here. I don't feel this post has been exposed well enough to the general player base. Ask yourselves, do we really want all these changes? Personally, I don't think the original BB6's should be touched.

Audessy

Mailman posted:

"Pending prioposal WIP (may 8th)
05 8 2011 1:27AM
MN/SN Change request #6

Ships:

Please change all speeds without touching the displacements:

SN BB Imperatritsa Mariya: base speed: +1 knot
SN BB Gangut: base speed +2 knots
SN BB Andrei Pervozvanny: base speed: +1 knot
MN BB Strasbourg: T space (small): 93 -> 86
MN PBB Dunkerque (MN): T slots (large): 118 -> 153
MN PBB Dunkerque (MN): T slots (small): 74 -> 86
MN ECL Reynaud: R space : 71 -> 70
MN PCL Gamelin: R space: 127 -> 153
MN APA Belfort: R space: 59 -> 70
MN EBB Danton: T space: 121 -> 174
MN EBB Le Havre: T space: 85 -> 86
IJN BB Amagi: armor weight: 301 -> 790
US BB Nebraska: armor weight: 283 -> 690
KM BB Kaiser: armor weight: 319 -> 760
MN PCV Daladier: Base speed: +2 knots
MN CV Arromanches: Base speed: +2 knots

Guns:

MN Lvl 120 x4 18.89"/45 cal Model 1945: accuracy: -1

SN Lvl 110 x3 16"/50 B-37 Pattern 1937: Change range so that it is slightly below the SN
Lvl 100 x4 16?Vickers Pattern A (do this first)
SN Lvl 100 x4 16?Vickers Pattern A: Change range so that it is equal to the US Lvl 100 x3
16"/50 cal Mark 7 Mod 1 (do this second)
SN Lvl 110 x3 16"/50 B-37 Pattern 1937: Required Level: 110 -> 100
SN Lvl 100 x4 16?Vickers Pattern A: Required Level: 100 -> 110

----
notes:
The speed changes are to compensate for the loss of speed due to the displacement changes
last week.

The BB6 gun accuracy was accidentally raised twice (my mistake, I copied a previous
request and forgot to take it out), therefore a small nerf is needed. Not sure if this is
enough.

SN BB5 changes as discussed in the topic about teh SN BB5 "

Original link

http://www.navyfield.com/board/view.asp?Num=194830&Sort=C07&Order=re_upday&PageSize=20&Page=1&SearchPart=&SearchText=&Ctg_1=&Ctg_2=&Ctg_3=&Mode=ok&Page2=3

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

My thoughts:

I am very skeptical of what's going on here. I don't feel this post has been exposed well
enough to the general player base. Ask yourselves, do we really want all these changes?

Personally, I don't think the original BB6's should be touched.

Re : You guys might wanna have a look at this.
05. 16. 2011 09:56

DJDeath	It's not a nerf. It's a fix.

Re : You guys might wanna have a look at this.
05. 16. 2011 09:54

Audessy	The majority of players don't know how to effectively fight an AW ship. I'll agree with that. I see players all the time whacking away at a AW with HE until they themselves are sunk. But nerfing 3 ships for the reason that most players can't switch to AP in time and adapt to the situation is no excuse. If you want a ship that can deliver a fatal blow to anything without any extra thought, I suggest you play a SS4.

Audessy

The majority of players don't know how to effectively fight an AW ship. I'll agree with
that. I see players all the time whacking away at a AW with HE until they themselves are
sunk. But nerfing 3 ships for the reason that most players can't switch to AP in time and
adapt to the situation is no excuse.

If you want a ship that can deliver a fatal blow to anything without any extra thought, I
suggest you play a SS4.

Re : You guys might wanna have a look at this.
05. 16. 2011 09:48

ZaGaTo19	i think no BB6 is supossed to bounce other BB6s, they are supossed to be 1-shot-wonders with this change Nebbys and kaisers will not bonce kaisers and QV so it will be quite more balanced. maybe Charlie also need this armor weight nerf the only issue i can see its maybe QV still bounce kaiser and other QVs but it far better than the original situation that maybe can be solved making some minor tweaks to guns or shells

ZaGaTo19

i think no BB6 is supossed to bounce other BB6s, they are supossed to be 1-shot-wonders
with this change Nebbys and kaisers will not bonce kaisers and QV so it will be
quite more balanced. maybe Charlie also need this armor weight nerf
the only issue i can see its maybe QV still bounce kaiser and other QVs but it far better
than the original situation that maybe can be solved making some minor tweaks to guns or
shells

Re : You guys might wanna have a look at this.
05. 16. 2011 09:44

AlexCaboose	Nice, glad to see this went through

Re : You guys might wanna have a look at this.
05. 16. 2011 09:41

Audessy	I mean versing another BB6. And other occasions when you get mad rushed by bb4's and 5's because you can't get away at 34kts. Personally, I think a AP fight between 2 bb6's is fun. It sure lasts a long time.

Re : You guys might wanna have a look at this.
05. 16. 2011 09:39

richardphat	Audessy, by armouring the kaiser, are you refering to AW in GB or AW in HA? I'll take consideration, I am just jumping into this topic, and forget what I read previously.

Re : You guys might wanna have a look at this.
05. 16. 2011 09:30

Audessy	When I did own a Kaiser and tried to AW it, it sucked. I can only imagine amagi would suck worse. edit And since when do you not carry AP, apmonte.

Re : You guys might wanna have a look at this.
05. 16. 2011 09:29

apmonte	Audessy is clearly in denial that people AW BB6s like mad.

Re : You guys might wanna have a look at this.
05. 16. 2011 09:28

Audessy	I love rhetorical questions. If I missed something, then enlighten me.

Re : You guys might wanna have a look at this.
05. 16. 2011 09:27

ljsevern	Audessy, you really do amaze me. Do you not know how to read? And citing one ships performance in GB's against another tiers is just hilarious.

1 2 3

Categories : Game News & Updates General Discussion Off-Topic Test Server Discussion Tip and Tactics Technical Support Suggestions Trade and Bater U.S Navy Royal Navy Imperial Japanese Navy Kriegsmarine Marine Nationale Soviet Navy

General Discussion

You guys might wanna have a look at this. 05. 16. 2011 08:34

Re : You guys might wanna have a look at this. 05. 16. 2011 09:56

Re : You guys might wanna have a look at this. 05. 16. 2011 09:54

Re : You guys might wanna have a look at this. 05. 16. 2011 09:48

Re : You guys might wanna have a look at this. 05. 16. 2011 09:44

Re : You guys might wanna have a look at this. 05. 16. 2011 09:41

Re : You guys might wanna have a look at this. 05. 16. 2011 09:39

Re : You guys might wanna have a look at this. 05. 16. 2011 09:30

Re : You guys might wanna have a look at this. 05. 16. 2011 09:29

Re : You guys might wanna have a look at this. 05. 16. 2011 09:28

Re : You guys might wanna have a look at this. 05. 16. 2011 09:27