PST Time 00:00:00GMT-8
Local Server Time 00:00:00GMT+8
ID
Password
FlashGuide
FlashGuide
HA Infomation

Royal Navy
Forum Quick Menu

  Index

  • Possibilty of UK getting a replacement PBB for the Dunkerque

    06. 23. 2012 16:59


Baker654

With the release of the French Navy, the RN_Dunkerque as the British Royal Navy's premium Battleship has become redunant (same with the KM_Andrea and the USN_Sevestapol). Back when the orignal 4 nations UK, US, Germany and Japan were the only nations playable, the premium battleships for UK, US, and Germany were SDE way of having the French, Soviets and Italians playable in some form, but times have change with the release of those 3 new nations and then current UK, US and KM PBB are no longer necessary.

I think the UK needs a new PBB one that is a british design even if it was one that date just after ww1. Fortunally I found such a design it the G3 battlecruiser.

It would be armed with 9 16 inch guns in 3 tripple gun turrets, with 2 on the front and one curiosly place in the mid-ships.

 

  • Re : Possibilty of UK getting a replacement PBB for the Dunkerque

    06. 23. 2012 22:30


EricIdle

That's one of the design studies before the Nelson/Rodney class.

  • Re : Possibilty of UK getting a replacement PBB for the Dunkerque

    06. 24. 2012 06:53


gazzy

16" armament seems a bit excessive compare to everyone elses pbbs

  • Re : Possibilty of UK getting a replacement PBB for the Dunkerque

    06. 24. 2012 09:30


Carrotdood

You mean you want SDE to make three new ships? SDE? Making more ships?

Forget it.

  • Re : Possibilty of UK getting a replacement PBB for the Dunkerque

    06. 24. 2012 12:56


manragon

Would be nice but as said new ships is prob a no go

 

  • Re : Possibilty of UK getting a replacement PBB for the Dunkerque

    06. 29. 2012 03:29


Baker654

Originally Posted by gazzy

16" armament seems a bit excessive compare to everyone elses pbbs


well the is ship going to be almost as big as the Hood in other words the G3 battlecruiser would be a hard target to miss and that the rear turret would have a limited firing arc meaning it would have to fire broadside in order to fire all the turrets, and the guns would be special versions of the 16(x3) mark 1 N or D so it would have a relatively short range, so the G3 battlecruiser would have enough flaws to prevent it becoming a game breaker

  • Re : Possibilty of UK getting a replacement PBB for the Dunkerque

    07. 27. 2012 21:23


wisey1
I think t is a good idea but sadly I dont think it will happen

  • Re : Possibilty of UK getting a replacement PBB for the Dunkerque

    07. 30. 2012 09:51


Mythic23

But I wuv my KM AD too much <333 dun wants to l0s3.

  • Re : Possibilty of UK getting a replacement PBB for the Dunkerque

    08. 01. 2012 15:57


Baker654

Originally Posted by Mythic23

But I wuv my KM AD too much <333 dun wants to l0s3.


would there be the possibility of loving the Mackensens just as much

Durability: 21 400

Normal Displacement: 31,000 t

Max Displacement: 35,300 t

Length: 223 meters

Beam: 30.4 meters

Primary R slot armament: Four 2x13.8" SK L/45

T slot sizes: 7x 30

Advantages: Very Durable, R-slots can field wide range of guns from 12.5 " to 15" guns, has 7 T-slots

Disadvantes: Large size (not as large as the G3),

  • Re : Possibilty of UK getting a replacement PBB for the Dunkerque

    08. 05. 2012 08:27


devildog8

I hope they look at changing the US and KM as well :)

  • Re : Possibilty of UK getting a replacement PBB for the Dunkerque

    08. 05. 2012 08:55


Maistral
They should. But trust me dude, they wont.

1