cuz they were not a nation with a reconizable size fleet for the nations your asking and still arnt thats why Busan / Nuet nation is to represent all the lame nations that couldnt afford a fleet with ship classes bigger then DDs and CLs

italy is still under construction, but with $DE maybe will take years to release it rofl

Yeah italy is coming out... within... probably the next year and a half... knowing SDE that is...

well, even with SN they are struggling a little so many ships in the tree are fictional "never built" projects. I don't think it's possible to make a reasonable tree for any nation (except the ones already there and Italy) that is vaguely historic without just inventing ships.

I know NF =/= real life but they have done a very good job with most nations so far to keep nearly everything up to BB4 real.

The other problem is that they will run out of things to make each nation "unique".

there is paper ships and then there is fictional ships. Paperships are designs that were real or planed to be real before ww2 but never got past the shipyard or even the drawing board (SN BB6 Project 24. Then there were ships in this game that were completly fictional but were created by SDE to fill in blanks (such as the BB6 (except for the SN BB6 Project 24))

First i must say I opose any more nations [except Italy] being interduced at this time

but to the person saying Canada had a tiney Navy, for a contry with less than 1/3 of UK and US we had the 3rd Largest Navy by the end of the War, with covrage of the entire Adlantic side of North Amarca. Yes Most were not captial ships, but if you look at the actual navial battles in WW2 the vast majority of engagements were between small ships/U-boats etc...

SDE dosent got the resource for this at the moment, sadly some many says here that not many other countrys got the navy size SDE looking for to add other countrys.
I can take a exampel of canada or sweden, canada got alot of ships but they was tiny if you look on what uk did focus on. But sweden did and have a tiny navy but they hade 2/3 of the navy was big ships and powerfull (not big to uk,ijn or usa) i gonna take a exampel of a ship named HMS Gustav V or HMS Sverige (some count HMS Gustav V and Sverige as battleships) they where armourships or if you look on the germanys ship line pansarschiff p project-o project.
My point here is all "smaller" countrys didnt have the economic or the manpower to support a big navy (germany couldent afford a big navy on the economic or the manpower side).

plz look at it like this its not the # of ships that matters here but the ship class and yes canada had a big Navy but cant be counted here do to lack of BBs CVs CAs CLs get my drift this is what made a navy power full example if 3 BBs were being attacked by 20 DDs the advantage goes to the BB for shear Power and Range since a BBs even in NF dosent have to hit you to kill you cause the splash Dmg alone is enough to cause Dmg and sink small vessel or take for instance a Nation only having Coastal defense ships are no match to a Nation with Heavy Armed and Armored ships look at the Nations in WW2 and see who had Capital ship Classes only they could be accepted into NF like Turkey/Ottomans they had BBs and wat not from the Germans