totally totally wrong.

acc/acc caps at mid-60s if BVEd. the last acc classing is about as useful as a wheel on the roof of a car.

Please, learn about the in-game caps before answering question where they are concerned.

The last class is a +2 bonus, and at a late level, meaning you miss a dramatic amount of the small benefit it gives. I won't argue that accuracy is important but it is also the easier of the two stats to cap. Using no RLD in the classing means you will rld cap late, and accuracy cap significantly earlier. Personally (and yes this is my oppinon shared by others as well) that the closer the two cap the better. And frankly with a nation [like us] I would rather rld cap as early as possible as main gunners can be used for AA as well.

all gunners cap eventually. Mine are acc all the way since I didnt knew better back then, USN was my first crew.

I learned about caps after, and banged my head on my desk.

Acc/acc/acc cap reload at monty level.

acc/rld/rld around halfway 80s if I'm not mistaken.

(thats +11 standard BVE)

So at 120, everything will be capped, no matter the classing.

Now out of all the choice you can make one is stupid. its acc/acc/acc. Why? Cuz acc is capped or nearly by the time the 3rd classing rolls in.

So acc all the way would be in fact for players that dont want to BVE their gunners, with prolly unboosted 11/11 60 or so vets and 1/3rd experted maybe. Those person pretty much have no choice but to acc/acc it at least.

I personnaly like acc/rld/rld.

The first acc ensure good blitz level performance, and a good accuracy growth. Once at CA lvl, I have the accuracy I need in good part, spread is nice and I start working on the reload.

While reload cap is harder to reach, it is also true you can play without it better than you do without the acc one.

Those kind of occasion is why im pissed this forum doesnt allow me to post "necro" cards other than the OP.


Impressive one, with equally impressive uselessness of the post.