Why the whinning, you must have had the imperalista, so they balance it and everyone who had one cry's

If you put estrelle in a H44 or L2, wouldn't the result be the same?

Like I said, what can be done with the SN BB5 can also be done with the other BB5 as well. In BB rooms, the BB5 isn't that bad, but the way it is now, it pretty broken in every expect. So people have the right to complain if things didn't turn out right.

Give it the range back at-least in the lvl 100 triple 16" guns.

Who has more right to complain at McDonalds?
The costumers, the employees or the volunteers?
I think the answer is pretty obvious.

I also want balance in all nations and I believe all nations should have some edge in some situations. It's impossible to truly have balance unless the stats themselves adapt to specific situations. It's inevitable to have a ship slightly overpowered relative to another in specific situations.

When it come to stoping a rush, which ships are more overpowered and which are underpowered?
When it comes to line battling, which ships are more overpowered and which are underpowered?
When it comes to AA, which ships are more overpowered and which are underpowered?
When it comes to rushing, which ships are more overpowered and which are underpowered?
When it comes to killing armored ships, which ships are more overpowered and which are underpowered?
When it comes to putting armor, which ships are more overpowered and which are underpowered?
When it comes to fighting SS, which ships are more overpowered and which are underpowered?
When it comes to dodging bombers, which ships are more overpowered and which are underpowered?
I could go on and on. etc.

All these questions should have different answers or 1 ship shouldn't be in the majority of these questions.

PS. The IM is still pretty good, so no complains about the IM.

Yeah, replace the words underpowered and overpowered with BAD and GOOD and I'm not gonna mention all of them. -.-"

The SN BB5 is boring in GB, that's what I was saying. It also has a couple of weaknesses I will not discuss that are easy to counter if played against with certain ships. Also, the SN BB5 was overpowered for BB rooms because of it's high submergence, not necessarily the guns.

Montana range would give you a slower, less maneuverable Montana with less firepower, so no thank you. That's just a poor man's Montana like you would to call it. You would be making yet another broken level 110 gun, that violates the SN's national trait of good range.

The BB5 with quads had L2 range(tested vs L2 pre-patch) in which the L2 ended killing it and the SN BB5 leaving the L2 in orange because the L2 ended up hitting with around 60-70% shells and the Sovetsky Soyuz with maybe 45-55%.

So when it comes to line-battling I would rate the L2 higher because of it's 40 degrees guns VS 45 degrees guns. So no, the SN BB5 wasn't that great but is still pretty awesome for BB rooms.

Remember, that it's now as fragile as a H44 and SY making it easy food for a certain ship even if the guns where left unchanged. In GB on the other hand, it wasn't overpowered but well balanced, because you tend to be more blind and have no coordination between players.

In that BB5 event that I couldn't even play for example AH-1 team we used a team composed of 3 Montana and 3 Alsace(bad turnout), and got owned by H44's, L2's and even SY, because range is more important then firepower in those rooms. That doesn't mean H44 is overpowered. That just happen to be the ship's best aspect in the game.

I have tried at-least 5 times to be in those testing sessions but I either find myself asleep during those sessions, or come late and find myself in a deserted server. You have the same rights as everybody as a costumer, but not more. That's the point am making. Everybody have equally the same amount of rights to when it comes to complaining.

you know lj your very full of yourself...and thats not a compliment.

People are entitled to an opinion and yours is not the only one that matters. Furthermore in a previous post you even stated you were not part of this balance for a good part of it due to other issues and in your life, so you trolling around acting as an expert on this seems to be a farce to those who actually did the testing....

and finally your correct it was not the strass or the dunq, but was in fact the richelieu, which ironically enough almost blew it self up and was torped by the british....

Now back to the issue at hand...the bb4 12 inches need some adjustment....but in all honesty if you go from imp to this you will need to get use to the separation of the front and rear guns for better angled shots.

Yeah, its not like we don't agree with the range, its that somehow its not been applied properly...