Community - Forum - View old data

Categories :  

Suggestions

  Index

  • Weaken UK US and KM DD3

    10. 22. 2005 10:14

blue87
As Much as i like the new DD3s, i only think its fair that the KM Z99 and US DDX should be weakened a bit. An idea might be to lessen the gunspace on both so that they cant carry such devastating guns.

I think the Z99 can carry 6.75s. whats the point of a CL (koenigsburg) with 3x6.75 when u can use a boat with 4x6.75.

DDX is just nuts with the right guns.... 5xdual 6" it can tear apart the best of CLs. not sure how decent this ship would be with lowerd gunspace, for i am not completely familiar with the US

THe L class isnt that big of a deal, my set up for it is the 2x dual 6" in the front with 4" belt. if i put the other dual 6" turret on, i cant fit any armor at all. But again, if NF lowers the gunspace a tad, and limit it to the dual 5.25s then i think it still be a good ship.

THe Tsukekei got jipped in the introduction of the DD3s, it has 5 turrets but has almost no usuable displacement for full crews and armor.

Please leave comments about my idea.

TY

-Blue87

(PS. If you agree, plz feel free to Recommend my post)
  Index

  • Re : Weaken UK US and KM DD3

    10. 22. 2005 18:23

blue87
1 more turret wouldnt hurt on the L CLass? are u kidding it would RAPE....

  • Re : Weaken UK US and KM DD3

    10. 22. 2005 15:57

m1a10042
I have to disagree with you. The jap DD-03 has massive range + good dmg at that range too. The L-Class is not bad if you armor it but maybe 1 more turret wouldn't hurt.

  • Re : Weaken UK US and KM DD3

    10. 22. 2005 15:16

blue87
bump. i think if this gets enough recommendations, teamnf will look into it... plz if you agree recommend this suggestion

  • Re : Weaken UK US and KM DD3

    10. 22. 2005 12:41

commander101
I like my mini brook, I vote no.

Edit: Actually, nerf the z99 kthx.

  • Re : Weaken UK US and KM DD3

    10. 22. 2005 12:39

enwhyoo
Yah ok nj, valid point; however, it is said totally out of context. When a DD can outmanuever and outpower CL2s (mind you, two ship classes above it), that is not something damn near balanced. If 2 nations can do that, why can't all four nations do that? Who would want to play IJN or UK gunship DDs anymore when you know full well you'll be slapped silly by pocket CLs.

  • Re : Weaken UK US and KM DD3

    10. 22. 2005 12:27

njandrewg
there is always people bitching when there is a better ship in the class. We can't have all equal ship lines, some nations have better DDs other better CLs others better CAs

  • Re : Weaken UK US and KM DD3

    10. 22. 2005 12:22

ypsylon
Enwhyoo why only 7.9"? Lets fit twin 18"/45 for which is no ship in the tree. :)

I also agree Z99,DDX,L must all be weaken a lot(Z99,DDX) or a bit (L). Tsukikei is well balanced - good as AA DD with 10*3.9" or for normal combat 10*5.5"N HE L.

  • Re : Weaken UK US and KM DD3

    10. 22. 2005 11:14

blue87
lmao Enwhyoo, that would be nuts...

  • Re : Weaken UK US and KM DD3

    10. 22. 2005 10:46

enwhyoo
How in the world can the Tsukikei parallel the Z99? You guys OUTRANGE CL1s and CL2s! 5.5" can't do that. We can't commence shadow op under cover of fog of war, pounding CL2s and hearing them cry in confusion and agony. Let us fit our dual 7.9s, then I have NOTHING against the DD3s.

  • Re : Weaken UK US and KM DD3

    10. 22. 2005 10:40

Phil
I agrre the DD3s are way to overpowered
1 2