Categories :

Soviet Navy

SN Seva vs US Seva
04. 01. 2011 17:07

Gjs3122	Normally I hate the "straight up whine threads," and I apologize in advance because frankly this sort of is one but its something that is bothering me. I have both the US and SN Seva on nebraska, and I am curious how these are supposed to be balanced. It seems that the SN version is better in absolutely every regard, basically identical except somehow faster and with a better spread. If you are going to give it a better spread (partially as a factor of the way the gunners are classed I think) shouldn't you have at least made it slower? Or a lower turning force (sort of :rolleyes: at this as a balance factor but whatever). As it is the US version has absolutely no advantage over the SN version which obviously is not "balance" in any form.

Gjs3122

Normally I hate the "straight up whine threads," and I apologize in advance because
frankly this sort of is one but its something that is bothering me.

I have both the US and SN Seva on nebraska, and I am curious how these are
supposed to be balanced. It seems that the SN version is better in absolutely every
regard, basically identical except somehow faster and with a better spread. If you are
going to give it a better spread (partially as a factor of the way the gunners are classed
I think) shouldn't you have at least made it slower? Or a lower turning force (sort of
:rolleyes: at this as a balance factor but whatever).

As it is the US version has absolutely no advantage over the SN version which obviously
is not "balance" in any form.

Re : SN Seva vs US Seva
04. 02. 2011 15:35

angus725	I'm doing what I can. I've asked permission to start a topic about SN balance on the test server discussion forums, but were denied both times. I'll definitely ask again once the next MN patch for the test server comes around.

Re : SN Seva vs US Seva
04. 02. 2011 14:52

V2CxBongRipz	It can also use an FCS nerf. BB2 FCS is too much.

Re : SN Seva vs US Seva
04. 02. 2011 14:10

Gjs3122	Angus take this as constructive criticism man but you need to start grabbing this thing by the balls and taking charge here. You seem to have mostly good intentions based on the posts I have seen from you but good intentions don't mean much if they aren't implemented. I feel for you a little bit since it seems like working with SDE would be like bashing your head against a brick wall but these things need to get done, not just "intended". Simple fix in this instance (off the top of my head) would be to knock down the SN engine space so its closer to the hp of the US one if not lower. For what its worth I did actually try to get on the test server and had a pretty miserable experience with the shared accounts (retards using the 120 sailors as restorers for the wrong nations and such), but this is one example of something that shouldn't take long to fix that the test team just dragged their feet on. You at least seem to have viable ideas which is better then straight up incompetence but you need to start getting this stuff implemented on some sort of a timetable. The bb5/6 is a mess too apparently. Hope that doesn't come across as too harsh or just bashing which isn't the intention, but the patch is live now and the timetable needs to be sped up a bid as people are already reaching the level these issues present themselves at.

Gjs3122

Angus take this as constructive criticism man but you need to start grabbing this
thing by the balls and taking charge here. You seem to have mostly good intentions
based on the posts I have seen from you but good intentions don't mean much if
they aren't implemented.

I feel for you a little bit since it seems like working with SDE would be like bashing
your head against a brick wall but these things need to get done, not just
"intended". Simple fix in this instance (off the top of my head) would be to knock
down the SN engine space so its closer to the hp of the US one if not lower. For
what its worth I did actually try to get on the test server and had a pretty miserable
experience with the shared accounts (retards using the 120 sailors as restorers for
the wrong nations and such), but this is one example of something that shouldn't
take long to fix that the test team just dragged their feet on.

You at least seem to have viable ideas which is better then straight up incompetence
but you need to start getting this stuff implemented on some sort of a timetable.
The bb5/6 is a mess too apparently. Hope that doesn't come across as too harsh or
just bashing which isn't the intention, but the patch is live now and the timetable
needs to be sped up a bid as people are already reaching the level these issues
present themselves at.

Re : SN Seva vs US Seva
04. 01. 2011 22:36

angus725	They should have been much more similar, not the way they currently are.

Re : SN Seva vs US Seva
04. 01. 2011 19:28

vbsurfer	thats why im leveling sn right now,for the fast seva,and yes i have the us seva too

Re : SN Seva vs US Seva
04. 01. 2011 19:00

V2CxBongRipz	No he is saying SN seva was half assed when it was balanced just like the rest of the nation. SN Seva has almost as good of a spread with 2 gold gunners as a 120 gunner spread on US Seva. SN Seva at 2 gold is faster then a 120 seva.

Re : SN Seva vs US Seva
04. 01. 2011 17:48

vbsurfer	so what your saying is you want them to nerf the ship you just paided 7 $ for?

1 2 3

Categories : Game News & Updates General Discussion Off-Topic Test Server Discussion Tip and Tactics Technical Support Suggestions Trade and Bater U.S Navy Royal Navy Imperial Japanese Navy Kriegsmarine Marine Nationale Soviet Navy

Soviet Navy

SN Seva vs US Seva 04. 01. 2011 17:07

Re : SN Seva vs US Seva 04. 02. 2011 15:35

Re : SN Seva vs US Seva 04. 02. 2011 14:52

Re : SN Seva vs US Seva 04. 02. 2011 14:10

Re : SN Seva vs US Seva 04. 01. 2011 22:36

Re : SN Seva vs US Seva 04. 01. 2011 19:28

Re : SN Seva vs US Seva 04. 01. 2011 19:00

Re : SN Seva vs US Seva 04. 01. 2011 17:48