^^okay a 5min Ban sounds better But is there a chance that somting like these suggestions
be implamented Like a Auto Start Feature when 20/8 is reached the Auto Start kicks in
after 45secs after the room gets 20/8 or like a wake up button for the Host - Wake up
button would flash a MSG simular to when the the Flag ship is sunk wit sound and make it
like a vote cast also so if say 15ppl push the button the host sees and hears wake up MSG
and if this dont work then we know Host is truly AFK and every body leaves .

And for the noobish impatient ppl screaming GO and AFK ect. give them the 24hrs. Ban

10 people for a vote is too small, that could just be a group of people from a fleet
sitting in a room, it should be atleast 15-20.

Also, there is no logic in an hour long ban. With spammers, a 2 minute ban keeps them at
bay from spamming. Im sure a 10 or even 5 minute ban would be sufficient.

The problem may appear to be the Hosts, but the real problem is NavyField itself.

What they need is an autostart (i.e host-free) setup.

We all hate wasting time in a room with an AFK host, but quite often the host is not
AFK, but instead some lemming sees 20/8 for 1 nanosecond and bails out, followed
by a dozen others, then the room essentially crashes.

NF is the problem. They need autostart feature.

I feel like a votekick system would be abused by the average mouth-breathing NF player.

I think the system we have is fine for right now. Yeah, it sucks getting an AFK host, but
I would rather risk that than let every player have the option to kick someone for being
AFK when all their real goal is to just kick him.

Seems a bit too harsh 24hr ban.

I would say that Audessy's sugestion it's great. +1

I love that idea Auddessy, but whats to stop 10 people of the same fleet doing it just for
"lols"?

Well then maybe if the North finally Invades the South the Commies might actually Fix NF

It is no bad idea. But it will never be implemented, because the devs are sitting in South
Corea and don't care for our problems.

"Auto start rooms when they reach 20 BB 8 CV or full capacity, unless host
starts sooner. "

I still believe this idea will do a load of good, plus it sounds very easy to code.

Any reason this might be a bad idea?

i see one problem whith that audessy
people who start a vote becos they don't like a host
so the host gets a ban/reported while he is there