|
|
-
5/1/13 Patch Notice
05. 01. 2013 12:09
TeamNF_MK2
|
Hey guys,
The following are the changes scheduled for tonight's patch update:
1. A number of Ship Tuning items will be added.
A. The following items will be added:
Turning Force +1
AAW +5%
Structural Strength +5%
Sight Range +10%
R Mount Ammo Per Bind +15%
T Mount Ammo Per Bind +15%
Torpedo Capacity Decrease -10%
R Mount Reload Time -3%
T Mount Reload Time -3%
Torpedo Reload Time -3%
Ammo Damage +3%
AP Increase +1
Gun Accuracy +1
Auto FCS Accuracy +5%
Air Tank +10s
Available Aircraft Space +10%
Aircraft Fuel +10%
Aircraft Launch Time -5%
Fighter Attack Damage +10
Fighter Rate of Fire +10%
Aircraft Defense +1
Ship Tuning Item notes:
B. The item is active for 3 days from the time of activation.
C. BB6 and Rental ships cannot equip the ship tuning items.
D. A 10% EXP bonus will be gained if a player attacks a tuned ship.
E. Ship tuning system will not be working during HA.
F. There will be no ability cap for using these items.
2. The Following ships' specs will be adjusted:
A. RN Lion II
-Displacement (Normal) : 20424 -> 31122
-Displacement (Max) : 57000 -> 67500
-Base Speed : +2 Knot
-HE Defence : 1580 -> 1586
B. RN Valiant
-Base Speed : -1 Knot
C. RM Argo
-OverHeatRatio : 50 -> 60
3. The following Rental Ships' required tech point will be changed:
IJN
-Ise (1937)
1000 -> 2000
- Fuso
2000 -> 3000
KM
-Scharnhorst
250 -> 500
-Gneisenau
500 -> 2000
MN
-Normandie
1500 -> 2000
SN
-Izmail
1000 -> 2000
-Imperatritsa Mariya
2000 -> 3000
RM
-Dante Alighieri
1000 -> 2000
-Caio Duilio (1915)
2000 -> 3000
4. The following engines will be adjusted:
RM
-RM SS Engine II
Power : 3400 -> 3900
-RM SS Engine II (Light)
Power : 3060 -> 3510
-RM SS Engine II (Heavy)
Power : 3740 -> 4290
-RM SS Engine III
Power : 3600 -> 4420
-RM SS Engine III (Light)
Power : 3240 -> 3978
-RM SS Engine III (Heavy)
Power : 3960 -> 4862
5. The following Aircrafts will be adjusted:
USN
-P-51H Mustang
Speed : 700 -> 680
Fuel : 400 -> 300
RN
-Tempest MK II
Speed : 690 -> 677
Fuel : 400 -> 300
IJN
-Ki-84-M Hayate
Speed : 700 -> 680
Fuel : 438 -> 338
KM
-TA152E-1
Speed : 690 -> 677
Fuel : 400 -> 300
MN
-MB 411
Speed : 515 -> 527
Fuel : 347 -> 185
-GL-832HY
Speed : 505 -> 517
Fuel : 385 -> 205
-LeO H43
Speed : 535 -> 547
Fuel : 347 -> 205
-HD 730
Speed : 525 -> 537
Fuel : 385 -> 205
-VB-10A
Speed : 695 -> 677
Fuel : 410 -> 310
RM
-Ba 25
Fuel : 216 -> 190
-Ro 43
Fuel : 240 -> 210
-SAIMAN 202
Fuel : 252 -> 230
-Ro 63
Fuel : 239 -> 210
-MC 205N
Speed : 664 -> 675
Fuel : 418 -> 318
SN
-Yak-9PD
Speed : 695 -> 675
Fuel : 407 -> 307
6. The following FCS will be adjusted:
Neutral
-FF FCS I (Auto)
AccuracyBonus : 55 -> 52
-FF FCS II (Auto)
AccuracyBonus : 58 -> 55
-DD FCS I (Auto)
AccuracyBonus : 60 -> 57
-DD FCS II (Auto)
AccuracyBonus : 62 -> 59
USN
-DD FCS I (Auto)
AccuracyBonus : 58 -> 55
-DD FCS II (Auto)
AccuracyBonus : 61 -> 58
-CL FCS I (Auto)
AccuracyBonus : 65 -> 61
-CL FCS II (Auto)
AccuracyBonus : 67 -> 63
-CA FCS I (
|
-
Re : 5/1/13 Patch Notice
05. 02. 2013 05:33
playing
|
2. The Following ships' specs will be adjusted:
A. RN Lion II
-Displacement (Normal) : 20424 -> 31122
-Displacement (Max) : 57000 -> 67500
-Base Speed : +2 Knot
-HE Defence : 1580 -> 1586
Wow... Base speed +2, it's fast enough for me. He defence : 1580 -> 1586? Lion II is already realy strong. It's not much, but of course it will effect. RN super strong, RM super damage, IJN super weak. UNFAIR!!
Structural Strength +5%
R Mount Reload Time -3%
T Mount Reload Time -3%
Ammo Damage +3%
AP Increase +1
Gun Accuracy +1
Oh... Cmon, you need to make exception! Ex :
- RN ships are already strong, has good accuracy, and great damage, then they use Structural Strength +5%, Gun Accuracy +1?? = MONSTER
- RM ships have realy great ammo damage and reload time, and if they use R Mount Reload Time -3% and Ammo Damage +3%?? = MONSTER
- IJN?? Use everything maybe useless, and will be healty fast food.
4. The following engines will be adjusted:
RM
-RM SS Engine II
Power : 3400 -> 3900
-RM SS Engine II (Light)
Power : 3060 -> 3510
-RM SS Engine II (Heavy)
Power : 3740 -> 4290
-RM SS Engine III
Power : 3600 -> 4420
-RM SS Engine III (Light)
Power : 3240 -> 3978
-RM SS Engine III (Heavy)
Power : 3960 -> 4862
Oh... You kidding me.
Hope you understand what I feel using the hardest nation, IJN.
Thank you, playing
|
-
Re : 5/1/13 Patch Notice
05. 02. 2013 05:38
Benser33
|
Originally Posted by unsthable
I do appreciate the prompt response, and completely understand that you can't share specifics on everything you're working on and by no means intend to step on or demean any of the effort you folks have put in. I'm very interested in the answer to my specific question however, and I think it's fairly within the realm of things you should be able to discuss. I may have been vague with it before so I'll try to be more specific with it.
The official patch notes for patch 1.369 were posted on the forum 05.01.2013 @ 12:09 PST. I only wish to know if members of the test team were given prior knowledge of the specific contents of the patch. Not knowledge as in everything in the patch is something you have tested, because you have tested this and more. I want to know if the test team knew before the 12:09 patch announcement that specifically the Lion 2 would see changes and the H44 wouldn't, for example. Or I know that you have done a lot of testing on planes, did you know before the announcement that in this patch T5 scouts would be getting slower and carry less fuel while fighters/bombers would remain as they are for now on the live server?
We put the patch notes together ourselves, basically. Or atleast a version used by GMs to check the live patch is accurate.
Only the RM SS changes were not on the patch notes we compiled for the GMs. From my own personal perspective I was aware of everything on the list except those SS changes a few days before it was announced.
L2 changes were done near the start of the project (the only reason this BB5 was singled out was the risk the max displacement tuning item would have with it, but when it was removed the changes to the L2 was finalised and displacement tuning stopped until the a dedicated BB5 patch), aircraft stuff was done closer to the end, T5 changes were moved from next patch to this patch pretty close to the end of the testing period.
The thread I wrote with explanations for all the changes was written about 3 days ago and just needed the associated patch to be made public. So, there you can see everything we knew that had been put into the patch notes.
|
-
Re : 5/1/13 Patch Notice
05. 02. 2013 05:48
Benser33
|
Originally Posted by playing
Wow... Base speed +2, it's fast enough for me. He defence : 1580 -> 1586? Lion II is already realy strong. It's not much, but of course it will effect. RN super strong, RM super damage, IJN super weak. UNFAIR!!
Structural Strength +5%
R Mount Reload Time -3%
T Mount Reload Time -3%
Ammo Damage +3%
AP Increase +1
Gun Accuracy +1
Oh... Cmon, you need to make exception! Ex :
- RN ships are already strong, has good accuracy, and great damage, then they use Structural Strength +5%, Gun Accuracy +1?? = MONSTER
- RM ships have realy great ammo damage and reload time, and if they use R Mount Reload Time -3% and Ammo Damage +3%?? = MONSTER
- IJN?? Use everything maybe useless, and will be healty fast food.
You should take a few minutes to read through the first page of this, if only to understand the changes to the L2 before complaining that it has been buffed when it hasn't.
|
-
Re : 5/1/13 Patch Notice
05. 02. 2013 06:21
Zyzzo
|
[QUOTE]
We have extended current NF Expert Festival until May 5, 23:59 (PST).
Players who missed few event days may still earn items.
[/QUOTE]
also mean an extended 200%exp and 300% conversion rate on the weekend?
|
-
Re : 5/1/13 Patch Notice
05. 02. 2013 07:03
Ruza_CZ
|
Originally Posted by Benser33
Originally Posted by Plazmadj
So, what this is saying is that the L2 is becoming even MORE powerful than it already was with higher level crews...as if it having great range, one of the fastest BB5s, and already being able to take more damage than other BB5s wasn't enough...
To clarify;
The L2 will take more damage than before, but still less than other BB5s.
The L2s speed is unaffected, although with a full 120 crew it used to go slower than intended, and this has been corrected with improvements to displacement.
The L2 will be able to fit the same amount of deck as before (or 0.1" less), and will more comfortably accomodate a 120 crew and bulge.
This is part of an ongoing review of BB5s and these changes are subject to future examination and possible change.
Whot I remember from playing on L2 on the beginign in BO lvl 103 rest of crev some levels I cem put max 9.8 inch deck, on level 120 I was able to pu 9.5, decrease to 9.4 is GREAT IMPACT on AW ability of this ship. 9.5 work 9.4 NOT.
IN fact Decrease L2 space may diallowed AW configuration vith full 120lvl CREV.
At eavning I test it wit CRW and I see if the worst happend.
|
-
Re : 5/1/13 Patch Notice
05. 02. 2013 07:22
JohnnyQuick
|
Nerf Fest!
Dont you JUST HATE those players using auto-aim? Hell, auto-aim was already penalized but now because some people got good on an already INFERIOR FCS set up.... it has to be NERFED even more!
When Scout planes are NERFED - less air time/speed .... like enemy AA is not enough or over powered fighter planes for that matter - that is more than just a sign of poor taste. It is outright ignorant.
Scout speed? What scout speed? Oh, are they flying too fast for players using manual aim? Tough titty.
I guess bumping the speed and power up on a certain SS is purely a reflection of a certain person playing that particular nation that wants "the upper hand" when facing other nations? Yep,.. right. That is someone's idea of Balance. Yep, ... right.
This patch is a reflection of a small group of idiots that have far too much creative control over nerfing and buffing and their actions reflect on NavyField as a whole. If the hacking and crashes ain't enough to drive you away, hell throw some nerfs and whacking (in-game adjustments made by players with administrative access) into the mix.
SDE has almost the WORST management of the online gaming community. Fix yer game or shut it down.
|
-
Re : 5/1/13 Patch Notice
05. 02. 2013 08:06
Mouth
|
Originally Posted by JohnnyQuick
Nerf Fest!
Dont you JUST HATE those players using auto-aim? Hell, auto-aim was already penalized but now because some people got good on an already INFERIOR FCS set up.... it has to be NERFED even more!
When Scout planes are NERFED - less air time/speed .... like enemy AA is not enough or over powered fighter planes for that matter - that is more than just a sign of poor taste. It is outright ignorant.
Scout speed? What scout speed? Oh, are they flying too fast for players using manual aim? Tough titty.
I guess bumping the speed and power up on a certain SS is purely a reflection of a certain person playing that particular nation that wants "the upper hand" when facing other nations? Yep,.. right. That is someone's idea of Balance. Yep, ... right.
This patch is a reflection of a small group of idiots that have far too much creative control over nerfing and buffing and their actions reflect on NavyField as a whole. If the hacking and crashes ain't enough to drive you away, hell throw some nerfs and whacking (in-game adjustments made by players with administrative access) into the mix.
SDE has almost the WORST management of the online gaming community. Fix yer game or shut it down.
Auto fcs got a "nerf" because of the auto fcs tuning component. The RM SS was too hard to speed cap. T5 scout speed "nerf" was probably because they are going to introduce new T4 fighters and the current T4 fighters will be T5 and only useable on CV6s. You need to take a chill pill and if you had the language comprehension and deductive reasoning skills of someone older than 12, you would see that this entire patch is good. Edit: the scout speed wasn't changed because of AA. It was changed because they shouldn't be uncatchable by fighters. Seriously dude, do you even attempt to think before you post something?
|
-
Re : 5/1/13 Patch Notice
05. 02. 2013 08:52
JohnnyQuick
|
Originally Posted by Mouth
......
Auto fcs got a "nerf" because of the auto fcs tuning component.
Oh, so tuning does not work with manual aim? Hmmm... did not consider that. Language comprehension? LOL!
Originally Posted by Mouth
......
The RM SS was too hard to speed cap.
What in hell are people like you influencing programming for then? Type a number and SAVE. {Wait a minute - this joker may not know what programming is or how it works :( }
Originally Posted by Mouth
......
T5 scout speed "nerf" was probably because they are going to introduce new T4 fighters and the current T4 fighters will be T5 and only useable on CV6s. You need to take a chill pill and if you had the language comprehension and deductive reasoning skills of someone older than 12, you would see that this entire patch is good.
"...probably.." , so you dont really know? Uh, I am currently out of Chill Pills but will get some soon as I can in order to not have a stroke.
Originally Posted by Mouth
......
Edit: the scout speed wasn't changed because of AA. It was changed because they shouldn't be uncatchable by fighters. Seriously dude, do you even attempt to think before you post something?
Scout speed for the highest level scouts SHOULD be faster than fighters. Decades ago the U-2 program (which was built on German technology) provided the essence of a superior scouting and surveillance capability. So in current NF essence the highest level scout should be nerfed to barely above a lvl 65 scout? That is simply outstanding! Yes, I do consider that what I post can result in a ban or termination of my account here. However the stupidity of certain people and their obviously fouled sense of reasoning places me in the position to where I almost dont care if I get banned or lose my account. SHORT ANSWER: You people NERF too damn much. The application as currently used known as Balance is a damn joke. Actions taken by individuals with administrative access is upsetting the player base with knee-jerk reactions to "special" items used for pay to win strategy.Adding more nerfs will be inevitable it seems...... dammit you people cant just leave well enough alone. Maybe someday you will understand the concept of "Chain Reaction". Enjoy your game.
|
-
Re : 5/1/13 Patch Notice
05. 02. 2013 10:35
TheFly
|
why not do it differently, rather than worsen we would not be top priority servers, no lag, and only then think about selling something ...
I agree that items are sold, but we can not lose performance in that we already have, why not leave the halls equal the WAW, without limitation, after all deserve after so many years playing and having fun and best of all making new friends and good
PT-BR
porque não fazer diferente, em vez de piorar o que temos, não seria prioridade melhores servidores, sem lag, para só depois pensar em vender alguma coisa...
eu concordo que sejam vendidos itens, mas não podemos perder desempenho no que já temos, porque não deixam as salas iguais as WAW, sem limitações, afinal merecemos após tantos anos jogando e se divertindo e melhor de tudo fazendo novos e bons amigos
|
-
Re : 5/1/13 Patch Notice
05. 02. 2013 14:15
Ruza_CZ
|
Originally Posted by Benser33
Originally Posted by Plazmadj
So, what this is saying is that the L2 is becoming even MORE powerful than it already was with higher level crews...as if it having great range, one of the fastest BB5s, and already being able to take more damage than other BB5s wasn't enough...
To clarify;
The L2 will take more damage than before, but still less than other BB5s.
The L2s speed is unaffected, although with a full 120 crew it used to go slower than intended, and this has been corrected with improvements to displacement.
The L2 will be able to fit the same amount of deck as before (or 0.1" less), and will more comfortably accomodate a 120 crew and bulge.
This is part of an ongoing review of BB5s and these changes are subject to future examination and possible change.
The patch of L2 is very "Succeful". SW variant is OK may be better. But AW variant with light 120LVL crev (delayded clases gunners) is fail becouse you need 198 tons lost in this patch too put 9.5 on deck and 0.2 belt and 1-2 buge (it is simbolic bulge) but you cant put 0.2 on belt which change you to bait for torpedos.
For me thats mean ADD more space -198 tons(IS LESS) for better plecemnt 120lvl crev on AW is one grat LIE.
|
|
|
