Of course it's more like a joke )), but if the attack was a bit of Hamburg before, then we would have more opportunities to attack the port. In my time zone this 7:00 am, so I'm a priori it does not take part, even if the application is filed. 

I guess you do not understand the meaning of a "fair fight."  As I have pointed out, it was very likely that the UK HA is an easy win for RA.  Your reasoning is that "we also have many of the players could not get into the game" and "when attacking Baltiysk was no more than 20 ships in the shock group . . . only this fact alone did not cause us concern, why you had so little to the defense of London."  This is like in soccer games that you have won easily in the first game and then you play 8 players against 4 players in the next game (both teams cannot get a full team due to circumstances).  Your arguements are: we have won in the first game, so we do not need to play fair.  It will be an expected win, so it does not matter.  Or, we cannot get 11 players because of the same circumstances, so it is fair.  What is your logic on that?  What is the right thing to do?  Let me tell you what is fair in this situation: to cancel the game and postpone it. 

I am not "whining."  I do not belong to the fleet that was holding UK harbor (you are making a wrong assumption here again if your message is directed to me).  I am just stating the obvious that you and your fleet cannot see. 

Dear kiraniv,

Sorry if I am too harsh in my words earlier.  I can see your points when there is no server login issues at the time.  With server login issues, it is the best to cancel because an assumption is made that the enemy fleet gives up (instead of cannot login) unless you had tried to contact the defending fleet and they confirm your assumption (that "they stoped defence in London after two defeats of their main forces in 15 minutes").  I do not know the whole story--I only get the information piece by piece from unconfirmed sources.  Did you try to contact the defending fleet?  Again, if there is no server outage, I would do the same as you would do.

There may be a language barrier--I am not talking about "honesty." You made the assumption that the defending fleet gave up.  Or, your argument is that the other team is expected to lose, so we do not need to give them the chance to fight.   In a server crash like this, give them the benefit of doubt and a fair fight.  What if the defending team leaders cannot login to message you?

In games, if there is an issue with fairness, the logical way to handle is to cancel or postpone.  This will save you a lot of troubles (unless you do not care about the player-base's opinions). 

I have spent too much time in this.  My previous message gave a good example.  The main difference between NF and the example is that you cannot talk with the other team directly like in a soccer game.  I am not spending more time on this and will let the other players to be the judge. 

Seeing the misunderstanding in your response urge me post a reply.  First, I am not in the defending fleet of UK harbor and I posted here as an observer.  Second, I am talking about a server issue during HA.  Of course, you can attack, defend, and beat anyone with less than 50 people.  My point is not to do this during a server issue.  I could not login myself yesterday around that time for 1.5 hours, so I can see the point of the defending fleet.  Third, I do not agree with your "fault of SDE" statement.  It is like saying that I can take advantage of you because it is SDE fault.  Yes, you can, but is it the right thing to do?