Another SDE problem is the desync. 3 times BAMF can shell SN in the last 3 HAs. BAMF does not shell harbor for RESPECT.

Now RA gives no RESPECT to another fleet.  Why should BAMF give RESPECT to RA?

May I sum up the said:
1. FG had low online during both - attack and defense.
2. How many players did you have at defense? (logined+waiting outside the server)
3. If you had serious enough login problems (but since 5 minutes prior HA started there was possibility to login for everyone), has anyone written about it to our members?
4. As I understand, there was only login server fallen, so all players, who was online - they stayed online. There was only a single crash of about 5-10 players, so I do not believe your entire fleet crashed and none could not write anything. As well I have seen players were reconnecting prior/after harbor tile started and harbor tile lasted for very long time (I was there for about 10+ mins and then retrieted and logged out, but harbor health still was much more than a half. Guess you had at least 30 mins of harbor tile battle to write about the problem).

How we have seen the situation:
FG had low online (we have seen it at their assault). We started the shortest path way only, without any other cells. We fought 2 tiles against about 20 players, finishing each battle in 5-10 mins, rushing from the respawn. After they saw pointless of the defense and due to running event they decided to give the HA away, leaving cells without defense to finish it faster.
We did the same when we were not interested in defending a harbor: we were leaving it or shelling the harbor by our own. That's why I regret we understood the situation in one way, but you - in a different.

If there was information you have a serious login problem and due to this reason you do not enter the HT and preHT, you should report the problem to us and we either wait till the login-server is up or cancel the application. I regret that we had such misunderstanding :-(
Our diplomat wasn't at this harbor so he has to get clarification and will give official answer and possible further solutions. 

The way I see it is simple. RA took a harbor that had little resistance so they can give it away later...?

RA usually play HA because they want to have fun playing competative HAs. Yet, they did something that goes against their own principles. Out of this I feel that RA basically took London out of spite. Why take a harbor that has no resistance (especially when it's due to server failure) when in the past you have fought HAs, beat the other team and still not take the harbor.

As far as I know, RA doesn't care as much about winning as they do about playing competive matches. Yet, this case is an exeption.

All I can say is that RA needs to stop making stupid excuses or justification for their unusual actions. Just be honest. You took the harbor out of spite and that's all there is to it. If you did, seriously, nobody really cares, well at least I don't because I'm not one to juge a fleet's obejectives.

I do however hate dishonesty.


Furthermore, I think its out of topic to mention that RA hacked the server and uses hacks, cheats or exploits without evidence, because even if there are players that do, people shouln't blame a whole fleet for the actions of a few (even though in this situation they kinda did exploit a situation to win a HA). Make those report through the appropiate chanels. Its also pointless to go by the assumption that RA has "better players". Both fleets have great players and to say RA deserves a win exploiting a bad situation based of this assumptions is just plain arrogance.

Both fleets make us all a favor. Arrange better communication for the future and RA just admit you made a mistake. I'm sure people will respect you for that.