ID
Password
FlashGuide
FlashGuide
HA Infomation

General Discussion

  Index

  • gg R.A. fair play jajajajaja

    11. 29. 2014 14:05


Argentina_10

Defense 2 hours and 2 hours without loguearme to defend my gg puerto_ RA fair play hahaha ... excellent excellent nf !!!!!!

 

  • Re : gg R.A. fair play jajajajaja

    11. 30. 2014 16:34


Andreyeff

Originally Posted by SSquadleader

Seeing the misunderstanding in your response urge me post a reply.  First, I am not in the defending fleet of UK harbor and I posted here as an observer.  Second, I am talking about a server issue during HA.  Of course, you can attack, defend, and beat anyone with less than 50 people.  My point is not to do this during a server issue.  I could not login myself yesterday around that time for 1.5 hours, so I can see the point of the defending fleet.  Third, I do not agree with your "fault of SDE" statement.  It is like saying that I can take advantage of you because it is SDE fault.  Yes, you can, but is it the right thing to do?

Keep in mind, please, that it was an opinion of a player (as well as mine), but not the fleet.

Everyone may make a mistake - the first didn't ask, the second didn't report, the third crashed :D

It would be better if FG suggest they vision over the problem solution: are they interested in returning the harbor via free harbor, or they are interested in a performing of a usual attack, or there could be made another option (e.g. a battle in clanzone or at next HA with some special conditions like: the winner of equal fight (without attacking/defending) takes the harbor), or they are not interested in the UK harbor at all?

  • Re : gg R.A. fair play jajajajaja

    11. 30. 2014 17:40


URRS

Originally Posted by Andreyeff

Originally Posted by SSquadleader

Seeing the misunderstanding in your response urge me post a reply.  First, I am not in the defending fleet of UK harbor and I posted here as an observer.  Second, I am talking about a server issue during HA.  Of course, you can attack, defend, and beat anyone with less than 50 people.  My point is not to do this during a server issue.  I could not login myself yesterday around that time for 1.5 hours, so I can see the point of the defending fleet.  Third, I do not agree with your "fault of SDE" statement.  It is like saying that I can take advantage of you because it is SDE fault.  Yes, you can, but is it the right thing to do?

Keep in mind, please, that it was an opinion of a player (as well as mine), but not the fleet.

Everyone may make a mistake - the first didn't ask, the second didn't report, the third crashed :D

It would be better if FG suggest they vision over the problem solution: are they interested in returning the harbor via free harbor, or they are interested in a performing of a usual attack, or there could be made another option (e.g. a battle in clanzone or at next HA with some special conditions like: the winner of equal fight (without attacking/defending) takes the harbor), or they are not interested in the UK harbor at all?




Silence is everything, and was especially evident Server

  • Re : gg R.A. fair play jajajajaja

    11. 30. 2014 18:03


JayDee85

Originally Posted by PiSkOpAtXx

Originally Posted by Mcuatro

The server crash than normal when RA is HA or HD, coincidence?

its not about the fleet...about a year ago the KM habour crashed all the time against bamf if we fight with the "Made in Germany" fleet so where was the cheaters on this day?
you fag


Originally Posted by Mcuatro

For my part I would ask that no fleet plays HA / HD with RA .

i only hear "i dont want to lose again against RA they are to strong"
it sound like the same on EU server "XXX fleet is to strong dont play with them mimimi"


Originally Posted by Mcuatro

Play alone , if it amuses you , you are not going to have trouble accomplish-and we can play without desynchronization or crashers .

every harbour got a desync! not only "Baltisk" play KM habour after 1h and few minutes the harbour is crashing!
(in my memories against KM habour)




http://bamf.jaxboards.com/#act=vt193&page=1
Pistol this is why you were denied. Please learn how to not trash talk other players.

In the end yes RA should of waited for FG to be able to log in. However the outcome would be the same. RA will win RN with FG there or not. Thus this whole 8 pages for RA taking a harbor while defending fleet not being able to login is pointless. If anything it gave FG more time to play event.

Bad tactics taking the harbor but as I said ^ RA would of won either way. 

  • Re : gg R.A. fair play jajajajaja

    11. 30. 2014 18:27


osn3179

Originally Posted by SSquadleader

Third, I do not agree with your "fault of SDE" statement.  It is like saying that I can take advantage of you because it is SDE fault.  Yes, you can, but is it the right thing to do?

Yes, I believe that this is a problem SDE. I think because it's not the first attempt to assign someone else's problem fleet RA.  Previously, all did not like that "russian uses too many subs in harbor" - ok, only 5 left to fight in the harbor. Then many thought that "russian use too much smoke in the harbor" - ok, increased reload time smoke. Then "russian subs were too strong" - ok, reduced strength for submarines and increased time of repair subs. Then many people do not like the fact that "Russian uses too much bombers and torpers, mines used in the harbor" ... I'm surprised! Why SDE is still not banned the use of mines in the harbor, because the Russian use them !!! Now decided to blame the "unfair game" by the fact that the server crashed and we had more players online than the defenders. Hey, not too many complaints? No need to change the rules at the expense of RA, rules of the game are the same for everyone and we have not violated. Do you want to treat you as gentlemen - behave like gentlemen and negotiate in advance, and do not be silent, and then blame. We can not read minds. Version that they could not write about the problem in a chat - this excuse, they had the opportunity.

3 minutes before the start of the attack on the harbor of London 90% of our players could not get into the game and did not know whether the attack will take place on the harbor at all. The fact that our players were able to 2 minutes into the game, and the FG is not - this is a problem SDE.

If FG is so important was this game they could find a way to contact us and explain the problem, I'm sure our leaders would have been no problem to cancel the attack London. But they chose the path of "shaking his fists after the fight on the forum" more stupid things to come up was impossible.

  • Re : gg R.A. fair play jajajajaja

    11. 30. 2014 19:12


kiraniv

Originally Posted by JayDee85

Originally Posted by PiSkOpAtXx

Originally Posted by Mcuatro

The server crash than normal when RA is HA or HD, coincidence?

its not about the fleet...about a year ago the KM habour crashed all the time against bamf if we fight with the "Made in Germany" fleet so where was the cheaters on this day?
you fag


Originally Posted by Mcuatro

For my part I would ask that no fleet plays HA / HD with RA .

i only hear "i dont want to lose again against RA they are to strong"
it sound like the same on EU server "XXX fleet is to strong dont play with them mimimi"


Originally Posted by Mcuatro

Play alone , if it amuses you , you are not going to have trouble accomplish-and we can play without desynchronization or crashers .

every harbour got a desync! not only "Baltisk" play KM habour after 1h and few minutes the harbour is crashing!
(in my memories against KM habour)




http://bamf.jaxboards.com/#act=vt193&page=1
Pistol this is why you were denied. Please learn how to not trash talk other players.

In the end yes RA should of waited for FG to be able to log in. However the outcome would be the same. RA will win RN with FG there or not. Thus this whole 8 pages for RA taking a harbor while defending fleet not being able to login is pointless. If anything it gave FG more time to play event.

Bad tactics taking the harbor but as I said ^ RA would of won either way. 


Hey, mate!
You consider it was a fair way of disputing? Next time attach screen of dirty underpants. 

  • Re : gg R.A. fair play jajajajaja

    11. 30. 2014 19:42


austinpage

RA took harbor knowing there was server issues. No more needs to be said.

  • Re : gg R.A. fair play jajajajaja

    11. 30. 2014 19:46


austinpage

There were other HA's scheduled but were cancelled because of server issues. 
Honor and respect are earned not given
And the fact that RA would have won anyways has nothing to do with this.
Fair play is fair play.
RA officers should be ashamed of themselves. 

  • Re : gg R.A. fair play jajajajaja

    11. 30. 2014 20:09


JayDee85

Originally Posted by osn3179

Originally Posted by SSquadleader

Third, I do not agree with your "fault of SDE" statement.  It is like saying that I can take advantage of you because it is SDE fault.  Yes, you can, but is it the right thing to do?

Yes, I believe that this is a problem SDE. I think because it's not the first attempt to assign someone else's problem fleet RA.  Previously, all did not like that "russian uses too many subs in harbor" - ok, only 5 left to fight in the harbor. Then many thought that "russian use too much smoke in the harbor" - ok, increased reload time smoke. Then "russian subs were too strong" - ok, reduced strength for submarines and increased time of repair subs. Then many people do not like the fact that "Russian uses too much bombers and torpers, mines used in the harbor" ... I'm surprised! Why SDE is still not banned the use of mines in the harbor, because the Russian use them !!! Now decided to blame the "unfair game" by the fact that the server crashed and we had more players online than the defenders. Hey, not too many complaints? No need to change the rules at the expense of RA, rules of the game are the same for everyone and we have not violated. Do you want to treat you as gentlemen - behave like gentlemen and negotiate in advance, and do not be silent, and then blame. We can not read minds. Version that they could not write about the problem in a chat - this excuse, they had the opportunity.

3 minutes before the start of the attack on the harbor of London 90% of our players could not get into the game and did not know whether the attack will take place on the harbor at all. The fact that our players were able to 2 minutes into the game, and the FG is not - this is a problem SDE.

If FG is so important was this game they could find a way to contact us and explain the problem, I'm sure our leaders would have been no problem to cancel the attack London. But they chose the path of "shaking his fists after the fight on the forum" more stupid things to come up was impossible.


 

Another SDE problem is the desync. 3 times BAMF can shell SN in the last 3 HAs. BAMF does not shell harbor for RESPECT.

Now RA gives no RESPECT to another fleet.  Why should BAMF give RESPECT to RA?

  • Re : gg R.A. fair play jajajajaja

    11. 30. 2014 20:58


xiliki_a

Originally Posted by JayDee85

Originally Posted by osn3179

Originally Posted by SSquadleader

Third, I do not agree with your "fault of SDE" statement.  It is like saying that I can take advantage of you because it is SDE fault.  Yes, you can, but is it the right thing to do?

Yes, I believe that this is a problem SDE. I think because it's not the first attempt to assign someone else's problem fleet RA.  Previously, all did not like that "russian uses too many subs in harbor" - ok, only 5 left to fight in the harbor. Then many thought that "russian use too much smoke in the harbor" - ok, increased reload time smoke. Then "russian subs were too strong" - ok, reduced strength for submarines and increased time of repair subs. Then many people do not like the fact that "Russian uses too much bombers and torpers, mines used in the harbor" ... I'm surprised! Why SDE is still not banned the use of mines in the harbor, because the Russian use them !!! Now decided to blame the "unfair game" by the fact that the server crashed and we had more players online than the defenders. Hey, not too many complaints? No need to change the rules at the expense of RA, rules of the game are the same for everyone and we have not violated. Do you want to treat you as gentlemen - behave like gentlemen and negotiate in advance, and do not be silent, and then blame. We can not read minds. Version that they could not write about the problem in a chat - this excuse, they had the opportunity.

3 minutes before the start of the attack on the harbor of London 90% of our players could not get into the game and did not know whether the attack will take place on the harbor at all. The fact that our players were able to 2 minutes into the game, and the FG is not - this is a problem SDE.

If FG is so important was this game they could find a way to contact us and explain the problem, I'm sure our leaders would have been no problem to cancel the attack London. But they chose the path of "shaking his fists after the fight on the forum" more stupid things to come up was impossible.


 

Another SDE problem is the desync. 3 times BAMF can shell SN in the last 3 HAs. BAMF does not shell harbor for RESPECT.

Now RA gives no RESPECT to another fleet.  Why should BAMF give RESPECT to RA?


To seize harbor by means of "DC", during video of broadcasting means to disgrace itself. I think that you understand it. You also know that with "RA" it is always possible to agree upon any problem. "Volens facultates, nolens difficultates quaerit". "FG" was able to do it, but preferred lie and subterfuges.

  • Re : gg R.A. fair play jajajajaja

    11. 30. 2014 22:32


Charizard97

RA's saying that they would gladly fight any fleet outside of HA in a fleet battle and everyone has ignore that. SOO RA if everyone wants to keep accusing you of hacking just ask them for a fleet match it can easily happen on the weekend and it consumes less time then an HA, it's a very simple fix and if no one accepts.. well that should say everything you need to know about them right there..

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9