" dont really see how the presidents have anything to do it. The only thing any of them did was give the order, though if you're going to bash Bush, dont forget how your favorite president decided to close down the prison from which they got the information on his whereabouts and condemned the methods from which it was obtained. Thank god for a democrat's promise.
I do believe this may spark a war with Pakistan (if obama has ANY balls) because of bin laden's proximity to a large Pakistani Special Operations Base and the capital city. For comparison, if someone in his stature was hiding in Triangle, VA, people would think the US was financing a coverup because of the proximity to a USMC base and the capital. Either Pakistani intelligence is a bunch of retards or they had legit knowledge of his location and decided not to tell for FIVE years..."
I'm sorry, But I can't let this go without some comment:
Your first paragraph tries to minimize Obama's involvement, then defends Bush with some off centered reference condoning torture as being successfull. Torture is wholly and completely unacceptable under any condition. It is a violation of the Geneva conventions, that does not distinguish between combatants and non- combatants. As for where the info came from (Gitmo), makes no sense. The only reason Gitmo still exists is because your party put the brakes on dismantling it and prosecuting them.
Secondly, Obama was actively involved, taking a tremendous risk of both US personnel and risking a possible military confrontation with Pakistan during the raid. The entire operation was monitored in the White House by senior military and cabinet officials. From strategy plan and launch of aircraft, to Pakistani avoidance and rapid retreat. Take a look at BBC website and read up on current info.
I agree, Pakistani ISI is a major problem. They are duplicitous liars and cannot be trusted. Pakistan needs to figure out real quick why the US didn't notify them prior to the raid.
|