recc.

Recc.

@normpearii

The suggestion is not the removal of US T4 advantages. I believe most people here accept and praise
the differences between nationalities. However, current system, regarding the US T4 fighters, are
way too powerful. We only suggests the balancing of the system

@Elliot2lazy

LOL!!! thank god i'm not a girl

Doesn't it say in the nations Positives and Negatives US had good CVs?

We finally do and now everyone complains...



Also I've found T1s work nicely at killing T4s.

Mustang did have its on major flaw, its oil cooler. Unlike other inline engines
fighters of the day they seemed to be realy vunerable to hits there or took hits
easier there, a flaw that I believe was never corrected. It was also a reason
they limited and took them off ground attack.

If germany had started getting jet fighters out much ealier than they did, and
could have would the US and England have tried to put a merlin engine in the
mustang or gone with their own jets? And without that engine the plane would
have been a fighter lost to history as just another fighter.

Its luck and timming that can make something that was bad, great and
something great, bad.

@Audessy
your worry is already the reality of IJN and RN now.
you dont want it, they dont want it either.
no one wants it.
That's why balance is so important.

The fighters need to be balanced based on how they would have actually performed
in real life. I'm currently grinding a USN cv so I'm not biased. The P-51's were good
fighters but they weren't a "win all" solution unlike some planes such as the Me-262,
P-80, etc. Stick to history, SDE. It's harder to argue with.

Like everything in the game, there should be pro's and con's. Merits and flaws.
Advantages and disadvantages.

Otherwise the ideology becomes:
New player, "what cv has the best fighters?"
Experience player, "USN has the most powerful tier 4 planes"
New player, "Oh okay"

The new player then classes his crew to USN. A year later the only CV's you see
joining battle rooms become USN. Is this really what we want?? Really??

OMG stanley you take the words right outta my mouth, I agree with you soo much if
you were a girl I'd kiss you!

@deadguy69

Your ideology doesn't make any sense. First of all, you can't compare BB to CV. They
have completely different systems. It is like apple and oranges.

Secondly, you only pick lame examples that people posted which can be easily
swayed to your side. Why wouldnt you pick example from the first post!?

Third of all, we are discussing the overpowering of US T4 not some advantages of
submarines or torps.
People are not suggesting to remove US fighter advantages or even change the
entire system. Most people agree and adore the advantages between different
nations. However, when some national advantages are far too great, balancing is
needed.

Fourthly, We are not discussing learning how to play. It is not the micromanaging
problem, but the
system itself.

Fifthly, didn't class on time has nothing to do with the overpowering of T4 fighters.

Sixly, i have a japan CV lvl 76 too. Grinding fighters with US t4 fp on the other side is
impossible.
Max of 8 fp will always get owned. At least with other nations, i was able to shoot
down one or
two T4s. But with US, their sky is the limit. No matter how much micromanagement i
do, my planes
(elite all BVE) were made of papers. Especially when, T4 circles right above my cv. No
matter what i
do, i can never get rid of them.

Lastly, Yes, you have common sense, but talking around the topic and not directly at
the topic
becomes TRASH.
- CV doesnt equal BB......barely any similarities regarding this subject
- Not discussing nations advantages/disadvantages
- Not discussing if there is a medal on top of the CV or not
- Not discussing if japan has the worst armor....(i still don't understand your
reasoning there
relating to this topic)
- Not discussing MICROMANAGEMENT!!!!!!!!!!!!!
We are here to discuss if US T4 fighters are way too powerful.

I do agree with you don't balance CV with BB nation balancing.

Also people claim KM BBs have the best range, but yet KM BBs are the hardest to
play period! If you argue that they are not the hardest to play, well you need to
broaden your mind. Also IJN BBs might have the biggest guns in the game, but it
doesn't mean they hit the hardest or are easiest to play with, since IJN is the
second hardest nation by far to play BB wise (high angles).

Something is clearly wrong when one nations fighters rapes all, and even with
micromanaging the other nations fighters have no chance. It sucks that SDE all of a
sudden went from Fighter and bomber stat was in affect --> only fighter stat in
affect with plane stats.

Still SDE/navyfield is nothing like the real world since KM didn't even have CVs. The
Nebraska, Montana, and plenty of other bbs didn't exist or didn't even have plans to
build them. The IJN is one the only nation in SDE that is most accurate since they did
have plans IRL to build or did build all the ships they have in NF now.