Community - Forum - View old data

Categories :  

Suggestions

  Index

  • CV ALASKA! Also the 4 Nations CV/BB Hybrid Thread

    07. 10. 2009 19:47

Kapusta
Now if this topic has already been made, nothing came up in my searches, and I
searched every possibility for such a thing as I could, and all I could find was a
sentence about a CV owa hybrid, which would be a little above the tier I'm thinking
of here.

*Everyone* knows that the IJN has the CV Ise, a hybrid CV/BB, and possibly TW.
And for a long time, people have been wanting a CV like this for each nation,
especially since the recent temporary spikes in CV wars due to the July 4th event.
Now I know that several CV/BB hybrids have been suggested before, but I believe
that this would be the best option: the Alaska CV conversion remodel.

Now, for a little history, which I'm kind of unclear of myself. As I understand it, the
US sort of had a CV crisis after the Battle of the Coral Sea, what with the Lexy being
sunk and the Saratoga in for repairs, and not many Essexes being in commision, the
USN was looking for ships to convert. There was the Baltimore, Cleveland, Alaska,
among others. But the Alaska stood out because it was similar to the Essex in many
way, but blah blah blah, Cleveland got chosen instead -> Independence, and
Baltimore -> Saipan, which is not in the game, and I didn't find that in any searches
either.

While the Alaska was never actually turned into a CV, and only 2 were built
anyways, I think it'd be a good candidate because:

1. It's similar to the Essex.
2. It's currently very crappy.
3. It's a BB1, just like the Ise, so as not to make it overpowered.
4. It's crappy.
5. It's gigantic and could use some fixing, so why not turn it into a CV?
6. It's an underpowered BB, so it's crappy.
7. The taking off of 1 gun won't be too bad, not that its firepower was all that great
anyways.
8. It has low firepower:size ratio, making it crappy.
9. It might have actually existed, although probably not in the form I'm talking about,
being a flattop instead, but I like it more this way anyways, so too bad!
10. Did I mention that right now, it's crappy?

Now as mentioned before in the list, if it had actually undergone conversion, it would
probably have become a flattop. However, things didn't progress far enough for
plans to be drawn up, so I'm just gonna "assume" that it was gonna be a hybrid.
Since it is very large, it would make a better aircraft carrier than certain tiny
CVs that somehow serve as runways for giant cargo planes *cough*Oyodo*cough*.
And also, since it only has one rear gun, the removal of it would give it still 2/3 the
firepower, therfore not nerfing its firepower so much that it basically becomes a
normal CV, and it would certainly be fun(ner) to drive.

Allowing the Alaska to remodel into a US hyrid BB/CV would add another aspect to
US BB play,
and would also be quite amusing. It would turn the US's crappier BB1 into an
acceptable and perhaps enjoyable ship. And while it would require a CV crew, many
US BB beginners have already gone CV. And for those who haven't, it would
encourage them to try out a BB before getting too sunken into a BB. Besides, the
Ise did it! And as for a name, Alaska would work for me, but you'd need to use
another date or something. You could also use Hawaii, or the name of one of the
other 4 Alaskas.

So now, enjoy some pretty pictures and such:

A side by side comparison between my crude MS-Paint-skin-grafted CV Alaska model
and the current CB Alaska model:


And the CV Alaska stat board thingy:


Oh, and did I mention that this will decrapify the Alaska :)?
  Index

  • Re : CV ALASKA!

    07. 16. 2009 13:07

Kapusta
OMG I want skills like you guys'. What tools do you use? Because I'm limited to Paint
and Blender.

  • Re : CV ALASKA!

    07. 16. 2009 12:18

JasonZombolt


CV Converting 101

-Think it out- It is lazy to just slap on a flight deck without some modifications. think
how would this work.

-Remember the Planes-Planes take space, and need a place to go to. Plan a Hanger or
shelter space. Also remember that if you are using a rear deck carrier, you NEED a
supplimental Structure for some form of launching.

-Compromise makes perfect-Remember to make this real-like(not realistic) you need to
explane what had to come off to fit the CV Part.

-Color Matching-This may not sound like much, yet matching Colors makes is meld more.

-Relax- This is the most important part. If you rush, it will show. Transparencies, Black
Spotches and other mess ups will show.

Follow these and you will have a good CV with Guns Carrier

  • Re : CV ALASKA!

    07. 16. 2009 11:06

minertheron
ok here it is geno tell me how you like it i need to touch up around the tower i didnt put
the structure off to the side like you did but how i have it should be good enough but ya
i did keep the small back gun slot in there to so it can mount up to 4x11" guns




i think i will add the wood deck back in by the side of the structure

  • Re : CV ALASKA!

    07. 16. 2009 10:19

carlos12
this would be great =)

  • Re : CV ALASKA!

    07. 16. 2009 10:01

minertheron
ehhhh geno lol i kind like it but ummm to start it how u layered it it looke like the
flight deck dips to the water but ya at least leave the other turret in the back as if
this ships armament didnt suck before but yaa i will tear up a couple more cvs and do some
handy work off of yours in a bit

  • Re : CV ALASKA!

    07. 16. 2009 09:48

Genosaurer


Hopefully you can find it in your heart to forgive me for the horrific damage I've
inflicted on your poor sprite with MSPaint.

I think this would be the most practical, with the gun arrangement you've chosen.

With the rear gun only and the flight deck forward, it reminds me a lot of HMS Furious in
original configuration.

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/4/42/HMS_Furious-1.jpg

  • Re : CV ALASKA!

    07. 16. 2009 09:26

minertheron
lol jason u said that well i was typing that in but ya ok

  • Re : CV ALASKA!

    07. 16. 2009 09:24

minertheron
geno u have a point so i changed the KM one around a bit off of it and i like it a lot better





as you can see it is cut down by 3 guns so now can mount up to 5 11" guns but in this new
position it supports retreating over rushing
ok so here are the quick specs that should be for this ship
-LVL-64
-cost-2910000
-durability-15500
-normal disp.-11000
-standard disp.-24120
-max disp.-27050
-turning force-20
-structual str.-65
-aaw defence-132
-overheat-62%
-armament-
-1.102-2.57-3.57-4.57-5.57-6.57-7.57-8.102-9.270
-FCS-80
-engine-275
-aircraft loading capacity-3120
-number of aircraft take off-5
-aircraft weapon loading capacity-625

  • Re : CV ALASKA!

    07. 16. 2009 09:19

JasonZombolt
I have one more CV Convert to go, a CL

And minertheron, I will have a guide on how to convincinglly make a CV convertion when I
post the Next one ok?

  • Re : CV ALASKA!

    07. 16. 2009 00:57

Plutocratic
Good work kapusta, keep fighting through the crap, I think its an awesome idea. Although I
would recommend making the colorado a cv remod, but thats only for its sexy factor,
nothing historical.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8