ID
Password
FlashGuide
FlashGuide
HA Infomation

U.S Navy

  Index

  • Problem with classing the main gunner

    07. 26. 2011 09:08


graid
My Gunner base stats are 12:10
Should I go for ACC-RLD-RLD,or ACC-ACC-RLD, or ACC-RLD-ACC?

 

  • Re : Problem with classing the main gunner

    07. 26. 2011 10:20


Stormvanger
You'll eventually hit both the accuracy caps and recovery caps either way. If you want to go with one of those three choices, go ACC-ACC-RLD to get to the accuracy cap faster.

  • Re : Problem with classing the main gunner

    07. 26. 2011 16:40


aingeal
I like acc rld rld.

Simply you give a good start to your acc so you can count on a decent spread if you BVE at lower level, then start working toward reaching the rld cap.

But as storm said, they all cap eventually. ACC-ACC just caps rld much later, at iowa level with BVE gunners.

  • Re : Problem with classing the main gunner

    07. 27. 2011 11:30


Blazer4show
Originally Posted by aingeal

I like acc rld rld.

Simply you give a good start to your acc so you can count on a decent spread if you BVE at lower level, then start working toward reaching the rld cap.

But as storm said, they all cap eventually. ACC-ACC just caps rld much later, at iowa level with BVE gunners.


I personally did Rld/Acc/Rld, and was quite happy with it (with 11/11 gunners)

  • Re : Problem with classing the main gunner

    07. 27. 2011 19:41


aingeal
Originally Posted by Blazer4show

Originally Posted by aingeal

I like acc rld rld.

Simply you give a good start to your acc so you can count on a decent spread if you BVE at lower level, then start working toward reaching the rld cap.

But as storm said, they all cap eventually. ACC-ACC just caps rld much later, at iowa level with BVE gunners.


I personally did Rld/Acc/Rld, and was quite happy with it (with 11/11 gunners)


Difference will be slightly lesser blitz-level performance for a better higher level performance.


At BB2 level mainly, your gunners are going to be slightly superior reload wise with about the same acc.

However my Guam spread will be much better.

Thats with normally BVEd gunners.

As a rule fo thumb, the more you plan to go ABOVE 109 vets, use more rld. (at 139 + should be rld rld rld) as the crew growth will give quite awesome acc growth and you'll cap it around lvl 60-65 still.

The farther from BVE you get, but on the free side, the more acc you should include.

Acc acc rld for a 50 vets, not totally experted and boosted gunners is a good idea, as otherwise you'll have lots of trouble getting a decent spread out of the guam and colorado.

You can also slightly adjust depending on your starting base. a 12/10 might allow you do do a classing as a rld that would have been better as acc in case of a 10/10.


At any rate, my USN was my first crew on NY, 10/10 gunners went acc acc acc as I didnt know about cap then, and even tough it was long, they hit both cap still, and they leveled with 80 vets, boosted not fully experted (eventually they got fully experted by GBs around iowa level)

There are no "wrong" answers. Just preference.

rld/rld/rld are better at BB3 BB4
acc/acc are better at CA-BB1 (if BVE, the last acc is useless and they class as acc/acc/rld)
acc/rld are a bit of an in between, and might shine more at BB2 level, while still giving quite good performance at CA/BB1 and BB4.
rld/acc will sacrifice a bit CA/BB1 but truly shine around sodak level, while still giving an easier time at the BB1-BB2 that rld/rld/rld gave.


At any rate, at BB5 all gunners have hit the caps.

  • Re : Problem with classing the main gunner

    07. 29. 2011 11:10


CaptianAlpha
I personally Like the good old fashion acc-rld-acc. I believe there was a post by doing it this way it allowed you to reach both caps fastest.

  • Re : Problem with classing the main gunner

    07. 29. 2011 11:48


Blazer4show
Originally Posted by CaptianAlpha

I personally Like the good old fashion acc-rld-acc. I believe there was a post by doing it this way it allowed you to reach both caps fastest.


Logic contradicts this, as Rld cap is hardest to hit. Without looking at the numbers cannot prove it atm. Will look at it later this weekend or try to dig up the old posts. As Aingel already laid out, the differences are going to be at the lower stages.

I cannot remember off the top of my head if Acc/rld/rld or Rld/acc/Rld hits both caps the fastest.

  • Re : Problem with classing the main gunner

    07. 29. 2011 15:30


aingeal
rld/rld/rld still hit the acc cap before the rld one.

So thats the one that gives the "lowest" level where both cap are reached.


with the raise in caps, I'd guess around lvl 80 with 11/11 BVE gunners.

I'd need to make the calculations, and bug richard out of the new values.

But as said, be ready for a really painful BB1 and to a lesser extent BB2 stage.

  • Re : Problem with classing the main gunner

    08. 04. 2011 03:01


klaas1928
Well, for all your information:

I now use lvl 103 12/10 acc-acc-acc gunners on my monty, and the spread is just awful...
Whats up with this?
The acc cap should have been reached already, dont it?

  • Re : Problem with classing the main gunner

    08. 04. 2011 10:07


megabstr
is your gunner boosted? vetted?
its impossible to have an "awful spread" on the montana if your gunners are well maintained and classed on time.

now, if you were over-exaggerating and were referring to why some other bb5s have a consistently tighter spread than you, it would be because of your gunner level.
you'll see an improvement even on the iowa guns when your gunners reach 110, 115

  • Re : Problem with classing the main gunner

    08. 04. 2011 14:22


aingeal
Originally Posted by klaas1928

Well, for all your information:

I now use lvl 103 12/10 acc-acc-acc gunners on my monty, and the spread is just awful...
Whats up with this?
The acc cap should have been reached already, dont it?


As mega said, dont expect a lvl 120 salvo.

The acc cap is also level based. So it raises with level, therefore more ability gets used every time your gunner level.


acc all the way gunners have hit the acc cap since ages. Its the reload that could have not been hit.


If the spread is really awful...check the FCS....... BBII (aiming) should be used....If you got finder...well bingo, you found your problem.

1 2