PST Time 00:00:00GMT-8
Local Server Time 00:00:00GMT+8
ID
Password
FlashGuide
FlashGuide
HA Infomation

General Discussion
Forum Quick Menu

  Index

  • H39/Stalingrad Range Comparison

    01. 18. 2012 05:02


Bergy1972
I keep reading conflicting Arguments.
One says H39 has best BB4 Range
other says Stalingrad has slightly higher Range

Could someone clear up for me which is true?

If Stalingrad has higher Range, and Damage, then H39 really isnt that desireable any more, now is it?

I levelled to H49, and Km in particular cause i like to have best Range in Tier, but if KM doesnt have that, then i spent alot of time and money leveling the wrong Nation?

 

  • Re : H39/Stalingrad Range Comparison

    01. 18. 2012 05:34


ljsevern
The Stalingrad needs fixing.

  • Re : H39/Stalingrad Range Comparison

    01. 18. 2012 06:30


Thebarrel
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZqyeQqfeX0Q this should answer the question atleast

  • Re : H39/Stalingrad Range Comparison

    01. 18. 2012 07:42


Rehor
That link is ten months old.

Changes have been made.

  • Re : H39/Stalingrad Range Comparison

    01. 18. 2012 09:26


Bergy1972
So does it outrange the H39?

  • Re : H39/Stalingrad Range Comparison

    01. 18. 2012 10:42


Thebarrel
Originally Posted by Rehor

That link is ten months old.

Changes have been made.


it still outranges h39

  • Re : H39/Stalingrad Range Comparison

    01. 18. 2012 11:19


acanafrog
I keep seeing alot of posts saying, "i need the nation with the best range". Frankly range difference between the BB4-BB5 is not that important. Can have just as good of games with an iowa as with a L1 as with a h39 and all of these ships have different ranges.

When it comes to the two ships listed the difference is so small that it really dosn't matter. Learn to play the ship you are in and stop worring about having .001 inch more range then everyone else.

  • Re : H39/Stalingrad Range Comparison

    01. 18. 2012 12:05


Elliot2lazy
The whole SN nation needs fixing, who wants to play a nation with no bb that is even good to play. Their all slow as a snail to play with no ship that stands out .

  • Re : H39/Stalingrad Range Comparison

    01. 18. 2012 12:07


ljsevern
Originally Posted by Elliot2lazy

The whole SN nation needs fixing, who wants to play a nation with no bb that is even good to play. Their all slow as a snail to play with no ship that stands out .


The SN BB4 is a complete beast...

SN is meant to be slow. It is a national trait to trade off having good salvo damage, 2nd best or above range and great armour penetration.

  • Re : H39/Stalingrad Range Comparison

    01. 18. 2012 15:45


Lionel2
Originally Posted by ljsevern

Originally Posted by Elliot2lazy

The whole SN nation needs fixing, who wants to play a nation with no bb that is even good to play. Their all slow as a snail to play with no ship that stands out .


The SN BB4 is a complete beast...

SN is meant to be slow. It is a national trait to trade off having good salvo damage, 2nd best or above range and great armour penetration.


+1 on this whole point

  • Re : H39/Stalingrad Range Comparison

    01. 18. 2012 20:20


Sonlirain
Originally Posted by ljsevern

Originally Posted by Elliot2lazy

The whole SN nation needs fixing, who wants to play a nation with no bb that is even good to play. Their all slow as a snail to play with no ship that stands out .


The SN BB4 is a complete beast...

SN is meant to be slow. It is a national trait to trade off having good salvo damage, 2nd best or above range and great armour penetration.


And RN is totally ok with the ability to:
AW
Have better submergeance than everyone.
Have a smaller hitbox than everyone.
Easy to use (low angle) guns,
And somehow still having great shell damage.

1 2