All I gotta say is : Win.

I've found that the more games you enter per hour, the more EXP you get.

Why you ask?

The initial shared EXP (Its an Exponential Growth) Starts ridiculously high on the Y axis according to my quick, rough estimates based on the EXP vs Attack Scored line plot I made on my old computer. That's based off EXP from 2008, so its probably higher now.

You gain ~50-70% of your shared EXP from the first 10 minutes of each battle from simply by hitting something.

I've noticed it in my BBs and SSs. I get in, bang, get out, wash rinse, repeat. Are any of your calculations on the forums?

Yes, let us encourage more gunships to be dead within the first four minutes.

I don't disagree; I agree with norm's analysis.

Playing for XP already trumps playing for wins. I would hope not to separate those concepts further. Those CV's . . . we know how they play (and yes, I drag CV's into this and pick on them because the shared/leeched-XP factor is far greater for them).

So shouldnt the Prem subscription be reworked? I mean $10 for a few more experts? In principle the buying of premium is supposed to "unlock" the games full potential or enjoyment, right? Why make a paying customers sit there completely wasting their time for a perk they've already spent money on. I mean the whole point of premium is to save time, you advance sailor and ships level in less time.