PST Time 00:00:00GMT-8
Local Server Time 00:00:00GMT+8
ID
Password
FlashGuide
FlashGuide
HA Infomation

Soviet Navy
Forum Quick Menu

  Index

  • SN range

    07. 17. 2011 15:03


Bosko
I am currently in the sevastopol and I notice that it doesnt seem to have very good range, at least for GBs.  If I can ever reach another ship, it means I am in several enemy ships ranges, and I always get sunk quickly.  Also according to angus' soviet guide range chart, the gangut has worse range than the seva, the izmail has the same range, and then only once I reach the IM or kronshtadt do I get more range, but not very much.  If his chart is true then it seems a little disappointing especially since SN is supposed to have fairly long range.  Is angus' chart correct or do the BB2s and 3s have longer ranges than the seva (and longer enough to make a difference)

 

  • Re : SN range

    07. 23. 2011 10:20


knightwsj
Originally Posted by ljsevern

Originally Posted by WoW_LoL
Originally Posted by Oneshot90



I started to playing SN BB because people said SN has 2nd longest range... but it was not true

:(


Totally agree with u !!!
Its" wrong !!!!


Then you are using the wrong guns.



You always right, I know.

  • Re : SN range

    07. 26. 2011 12:12


Oneshot90
hey guys plz check the old range chart.

Stalin 16" wasn't 2nd longest range before it get buffed recently

It was outranged by Yamato and H39 and Iowa.(just longer than Lion I and Rich)

if you say that 12" is right gun for Stalin (I knew that 12" guns are longer that H39's 16"s)
and people who use 16" are wrong, hew... I have nothing to say :(

because I think 16" guns should be the right guns for BB4

and 12" guns are wrong guns for BB4



and now? what about Soyuz?

their 100 guns are nerfed badly and also the max displacement is increased... can't even hold few shells

also Soyuz doesn't have 2nd longest range even though it has big displacement which makes it weaker

and low speed, big hit box and low turning force.... great mix of disadvantages :(


I know that testers work hard for other players as volunteer and we apprieciate that

but... they failed to make it balanced now... SN needs some buffs now... really

  • Re : SN range

    07. 26. 2011 12:23


heatrr
Originally Posted by Oneshot90

SN needs some buffs now... really


You read much, oneshot90?
Let me help ya by quoting Richard:

Originally Posted by richardphat

SN nation was never balanced to begin with. Even this wednesday patch, they are still not balanced.


And the testers are working on making further changes, balances, etc. to SN, among all other nations.

  • Re : SN range

    07. 27. 2011 07:03


Oneshot90
Originally Posted by heatrr

Originally Posted by Oneshot90

SN needs some buffs now... really


You read much, oneshot90?
Let me help ya by quoting Richard:

Originally Posted by richardphat

SN nation was never balanced to begin with. Even this wednesday patch, they are still not balanced.


And the testers are working on making further changes, balances, etc. to SN, among all other nations.


I know but then what?
should I shut up and say nothing about my ship's disadvantage which makes the ship really unbalanced?

the testers need feedback from users, don't they?

and in my opinion they are now totally on the wrong direction of balancing
need to realize it

1 2