ID
Password
FlashGuide
FlashGuide
HA Infomation

Suggestions

  Index

  • Ships retreating

    03. 26. 2015 04:56

Recommend : 1

franlefou

Hello, I would like to see your opinion about the fact that some CVs or others ships are retreating north because they are loosing. I would like to find a way to eliminate this kind of mentaly, for example If a ship retreated, he will loose 75% of his exp / credits.. or something else if you get some ideas.

 

  • Re : Ships retreating

    04. 04. 2015 06:06


franlefou

The problem is that CVs retreat when they are loosing. It's just called fair play. If ennemy team was better, they deserve to get a better dmg, so more exp, no?

  • Re : Ships retreating

    04. 04. 2015 08:52


ErwinJA

In general, if a ship retreats, there shouldn't be much of a problem. Just because some players don't like it, doesn't mean it's unacceptable. I'm especially accommodating when the player has almost no chance of getting additional experience. If the last BB is fighter camped and heavily outnumbered, the only reason not to retreat is extremely good sportsmanship. And if the BB does, it's his opponents' fault for not giving him a chance to fight back. If the last CV has no planes or is a camped BW, it's perfectly fine to see no reason to feed the enemy's experience gain for not only no personal benefit, but a loss.

The only places I see issues are Occupation and GB2. In GB2, I've seen CVs screw over their own teams by retreating. And there's an occasional instance of exploiting Occupation's issue to spite the other team. For those kinds of things, I'd happily punish players. But for the rest: not so much.

  • Re : Ships retreating

    04. 08. 2015 04:28


franlefou

Originally Posted by ErwinJA

In general, if a ship retreats, there shouldn't be much of a problem. Just because some players don't like it, doesn't mean it's unacceptable. I'm especially accommodating when the player has almost no chance of getting additional experience. If the last BB is fighter camped and heavily outnumbered, the only reason not to retreat is extremely good sportsmanship. And if the BB does, it's his opponents' fault for not giving him a chance to fight back. If the last CV has no planes or is a camped BW, it's perfectly fine to see no reason to feed the enemy's experience gain for not only no personal benefit, but a loss.

The only places I see issues are Occupation and GB2. In GB2, I've seen CVs screw over their own teams by retreating. And there's an occasional instance of exploiting Occupation's issue to spite the other team. For those kinds of things, I'd happily punish players. But for the rest: not so much.

 

For the second part, I agree with you about the occupation. But for the first one, in GB for exemple, It's not fair. The ennemy team had been better, so it's like a reward for them to be killed, to win more exp. it's not about yourself, just think about the others. If there is no personal benefit, lot of people won't fight, and retreat. But that's the matter. It's a question of respect for me .. the team who won the battle deserves to kill every people in the ennemy team. Question of respect as I said for me..

1 2