ID
Password
FlashGuide
FlashGuide
HA Infomation

Suggestions

  Index

  • Submarines General Suggestion.( Edited )

    08. 28. 2011 20:33

Recommend : 1

Humberto20

Im going to open this thread with also a suggestion. Suggest anything related to submarines in this thread and not having many subs
ideas spread in the whole suggestion section.Post your ideas here, and lets avoid multiple same topic suggestions:


Rules:

-No Flamming, No thread without specific information, or specific response, why or why not should be introduced.the number
next to the list items, are the number of recommendations.I ll be adding more features, while people suggest it, people just have to vote.
and i will put the number or increase it.


WishList ( Suggestions )

- Ability to remove Deckgun. ( 1 )
- New Premium Items:Artillery Rockets. ( 1 )
-Increase DP.( 0 )
- Submarine Upgrades between al ss tiers. (0 )
-Homing torpedoes. ( 1 )
-New premium items: Batteries ( 0 )
-More Support slots ( 1 )
-Air Buff ( 1 )       
-Schnorke ( 1 )       

 

  • Re : Submarines Wishlist.

    08. 29. 2011 23:11


aingeal
Originally Posted by leaderwolf

Originally Posted by aingeal

Originally Posted by DJDeath

Yay for more premium BS.


I'm actually afraid SDE will yet again be nomnomnom money money and could introduce dumb content in order to suck a few pennies from sub players.



Originally Posted by leaderwolf
Our Subs elite isn't want project Subs or + stuff fictionary,never build is want just already used stuff.
That is a constructive wish topic,not old dark age of inquisition burn or cut,so be constructive.


As much as you say that, what I'm seeing here is sub player that ask for this or that without being constructive about why they ask. I want to see you explain why you think this would be profitable to sub, how you are seeing it apply, what counter part you are proposing to it and why you are proposing them.

I won't bother telling you more RL =/= NF, since I doubt you actually have the ability to process its meaning after the tons of "make this game RL!!!" suggestions you posted.

However, what about if I said this :

Iowa had nuclear shell developped, give nuclear fire to USN BB4!

You'd actually applaud the idea saying its RL content?

follow your logic NF=/=RL JUST FOR ONE SIDE?REALLY? and Balance just one side?
Iowa project shell nuke really? and poor Germans(high tech have nothing)?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZoMR_Oj6Qrs
your NF=/RL argument is fail,you cant read and processing information.
Don't Quote to my if enter in library just for xxx stuff or color books.
Can be constructive or just reply spam?That is you?



Don't comment if you are such a fail at reading you can't (or don't want to) understand the meaning of a post. I'm not bothering re-writing it or explaining it, as I'm sure most people understood what I meant in the last part of it.


You know nothing about logic, dont try to follow mine, you'll burn your brain cells.

You also know nothing about me, and personnal attacks on someone you do not know are kinda pitiful.

You also know nothing about constructivism, so I won't bother arguing with a brick wall there.


For the record, I'd like to point out you started the flaming while my post was asking for people to clarify their suggestions.

someone who blindly recommend any buff they can for their class cannot understand my motivations I guess.

  • Re : Submarines Wishlist.

    08. 29. 2011 23:31


leaderwolf
I ignore up of comment,cos can talk with non like books.
Because i'm a constructive person i suggest for SS6 KM Tarnmmatte* improved(sure you never know what is that)
*= not add for that topic.
Upgrade all subs already with new torpedoes lvl,remove gun option.
Balance must work for all vessel.

  • Re : Submarines Wishlist.

    08. 30. 2011 01:39


eagleowl68
I'm a complete sub nut,but the only item on the original wishlist I agree with is the ability to remove the deckgun.
All the others would either be hisrorically inaccurate,or would cause even more animosity toward subs than there already is-and God knows there's enough anti~sub sentiment already!

  • Re : Submarines Wishlist.

    08. 30. 2011 02:04


DJDeath
Originally Posted by leaderwolf

i'm a constructive person



That... made my day. :D

  • Re : Submarines Wishlist.

    08. 30. 2011 04:38


mysharona
altsein, can i ask what is 'project paper'? i always hear you say it but dont know what it means

  • Re : Submarines Wishlist.

    08. 31. 2011 17:01


Azyren
Originally Posted by DJDeath

Originally Posted by leaderwolf

i'm a constructive person



That... made my day. :D


This made me fall out of my chair laughing xD

  • Re : Submarines Wishlist.

    08. 31. 2011 17:01


Azyren
Originally Posted by aingeal

Originally Posted by leaderwolf

Originally Posted by aingeal

Originally Posted by DJDeath

Yay for more premium BS.


I'm actually afraid SDE will yet again be nomnomnom money money and could introduce dumb content in order to suck a few pennies from sub players.



Originally Posted by leaderwolf
Our Subs elite isn't want project Subs or + stuff fictionary,never build is want just already used stuff.
That is a constructive wish topic,not old dark age of inquisition burn or cut,so be constructive.


As much as you say that, what I'm seeing here is sub player that ask for this or that without being constructive about why they ask. I want to see you explain why you think this would be profitable to sub, how you are seeing it apply, what counter part you are proposing to it and why you are proposing them.

I won't bother telling you more RL =/= NF, since I doubt you actually have the ability to process its meaning after the tons of "make this game RL!!!" suggestions you posted.

However, what about if I said this :

Iowa had nuclear shell developped, give nuclear fire to USN BB4!

You'd actually applaud the idea saying its RL content?

follow your logic NF=/=RL JUST FOR ONE SIDE?REALLY? and Balance just one side?
Iowa project shell nuke really? and poor Germans(high tech have nothing)?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZoMR_Oj6Qrs
your NF=/RL argument is fail,you cant read and processing information.
Don't Quote to my if enter in library just for xxx stuff or color books.
Can be constructive or just reply spam?That is you?



Don't comment if you are such a fail at reading you can't (or don't want to) understand the meaning of a post. I'm not bothering re-writing it or explaining it, as I'm sure most people understood what I meant in the last part of it.


You know nothing about logic, dont try to follow mine, you'll burn your brain cells.

You also know nothing about me, and personnal attacks on someone you do not know are kinda pitiful.

You also know nothing about constructivism, so I won't bother arguing with a brick wall there.


For the record, I'd like to point out you started the flaming while my post was asking for people to clarify their suggestions.

someone who blindly recommend any buff they can for their class cannot understand my motivations I guess.

Stop trolling and add to the discussion please :)
You are attacking his post, not his ideas.

  • Re : Submarines Wishlist.

    08. 31. 2011 18:08


aingeal
Originally Posted by Azyren

Originally Posted by aingeal

Originally Posted by leaderwolf

Originally Posted by aingeal

Originally Posted by DJDeath

Yay for more premium BS.


I'm actually afraid SDE will yet again be nomnomnom money money and could introduce dumb content in order to suck a few pennies from sub players.



Originally Posted by leaderwolf
Our Subs elite isn't want project Subs or + stuff fictionary,never build is want just already used stuff.
That is a constructive wish topic,not old dark age of inquisition burn or cut,so be constructive.


As much as you say that, what I'm seeing here is sub player that ask for this or that without being constructive about why they ask. I want to see you explain why you think this would be profitable to sub, how you are seeing it apply, what counter part you are proposing to it and why you are proposing them.

I won't bother telling you more RL =/= NF, since I doubt you actually have the ability to process its meaning after the tons of "make this game RL!!!" suggestions you posted.

However, what about if I said this :

Iowa had nuclear shell developped, give nuclear fire to USN BB4!

You'd actually applaud the idea saying its RL content?

follow your logic NF=/=RL JUST FOR ONE SIDE?REALLY? and Balance just one side?
Iowa project shell nuke really? and poor Germans(high tech have nothing)?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZoMR_Oj6Qrs
your NF=/RL argument is fail,you cant read and processing information.
Don't Quote to my if enter in library just for xxx stuff or color books.
Can be constructive or just reply spam?That is you?



Don't comment if you are such a fail at reading you can't (or don't want to) understand the meaning of a post. I'm not bothering re-writing it or explaining it, as I'm sure most people understood what I meant in the last part of it.


You know nothing about logic, dont try to follow mine, you'll burn your brain cells.

You also know nothing about me, and personnal attacks on someone you do not know are kinda pitiful.

You also know nothing about constructivism, so I won't bother arguing with a brick wall there.


For the record, I'd like to point out you started the flaming while my post was asking for people to clarify their suggestions.

someone who blindly recommend any buff they can for their class cannot understand my motivations I guess.

Stop trolling and add to the discussion please :)
You are attacking his post, not his ideas.


I don't see why I'd "add" anything, since the questions I asked on the first pages weren't answered.

You quoted it yourself btw.

Originally Posted by aingeal
As much as you say that, what I'm seeing here is sub player that ask for this or that without being constructive about why they ask. I want to see you explain why you think this would be profitable to sub, how you are seeing it apply, what counter part you are proposing to it and why you are proposing them.



For the rest, no matter what you can tell leaderwolf, he ignores it, tells you are "non-book" and go on a "in RL..." rant.

I want a discussion, I want people to debate their ideas, not just throw random sentence that contain an half-tought somewhere in it.

Sub balance is probably going to be the biggest challenge balance-wise NF has ever seen, as the class partly rest on a RPS balance (ASW>Sub>BB)

We don't need people posting non-sense here, believe me. If you want content, go check the sub topics on test forum server. I,ve posted plenty there. I'm growing tired of posting again and again the same things over and over.


As far as leaderwolf goes, I,ve grown tired of him just figuring he has the ultimate truth. We don't need that type of people in the discussion.


In fact, your 2 post are much closer to trolling than mine.

see rather:

Originally Posted by Azyren

Originally Posted by DJDeath

Originally Posted by leaderwolf

i'm a constructive person



That... made my day. :D


This made me fall out of my chair laughing xD


Totally adding to the discussion are you?



My ideas are on the side of making subs main weapon being stealth, and that a good sub player would be in fact the player that nobody ever see coming, not the one with crazy OH, smokes and a planesman that refill 2 min of air in 10 sec (duration of a smoke strangely). Changing them, rather than just applying an overall nerf-bat to the current boring playstyle.

I can't say I remember you actively participating to those discussions.

But this topic so far is a grocery list of buff that people would like for no other reason than "I want my ship to be ultimate pwnzer weapon!"

Air buff. Alright. how do you see this applying in game? Taking into account the current imbalance, how would you introduce it so it doesnt make it worse, but also makes it fun?

Anyone who read what I wrote before knows I am actually for such a buff. A significant one too. I am also however asking for surface fire vulnerability, and slower speeds. Feel free to go check my post in the test server sub discussion, around page 15. (AND NO THIS ISNT A BUFF RECC FOR THIS THREAD)

  • Re : Submarines Wishlist.

    09. 01. 2011 02:22


aingeal
(leaving this there, he deleted his post and reposted after me)


Originally Posted by leaderwolf

But this topic so far is a grocery list of buff that people would like for no other reason than "I want my ship to be ultimate pwnzer weapon!"

Isn't BB6 paper project ultimate weapons,and other is try to keep that?

Still i'm constructive person,glad to fell yours smile,but for loved subs.


They are the best BBs just as the SS4 (or soon 5) are the best SS.

There is no relation to be seen there, especially since BB6s are end-game ships.

We are talking far more than only subs when we are thinking about balancing them. We have that RPS (rock/paper/scissor) to take into account, without overexagerating it.

So we have to balance SS vs BBs, SS vs SS, SS vs ASW so all of them are fun.

If you really wish to see an improvement, broaden your horizons, and look past your own ships like most of us do.

I'm openly specialized in BB, yet I do not hold a BB exclusive agenda. You would know this if you bothered to read people's post carefully. You would also know why I'm annoyed with your attitude. I,ve said it clearly quite a few times.

  • Re : Submarines Wishlist.

    09. 01. 2011 02:23


leaderwolf
''But this topic so far is a grocery list of buff that people would like for no other reason than "I want my ship to be ultimate pwnzer weapon!"

^^^^^^HE HE THAT IS YOURS SELF WORDS.LOL

I fail quote sry.

Isn't BB6 paper project ultimate weapons,and other is try to keep that?

Still i'm constructive person,glad to fell other smile,but for loved subs.

Your attitude is in translate= i don't play subs,i cant do it,but i have some point's about subs players.

So i forgive you again cos you are wrong,i appreciate any good point but not yours in all topics subs.
How can talk about a thing you don't know?subs?
I don't give sentence about you,I dont judge about directly insulting.I forgive you
I'm a SS3 players and i want right things already used.
Still you cant response about BB6 paper proj is ultimate weapons?
You can be clear? No.
I answer cos you can't BB6 is ultimate weapons,a OP king of map is that OK?yes.
Again i forgive you cos you don't understand and are angry,be blessed dear child of GOD.

1 2 3 4 5