|
|
-
Suggestion: FORUM new tool/
09. 02. 2011 13:04
 Recommend : 1
Humberto20
|
I would like to suggest a new tool for the forums, in the last couple of days, some threads were flammable. My suggestion
is, give users a new tool to apost a thread with an option to vote if they like idea or no, An option for players, taht disables
response, and this can help to avoid flam replies from people that doesnt like this or that, even from both sides.
Benefits:
Confidential Votes
No flamming when thread is disabled by user for replies.
|
-
Re : Suggestion: FORUM new tool/
09. 02. 2011 16:47
aingeal
|
Originally Posted by Humberto20
Originally Posted by ljsevern
Originally Posted by Humberto20
Originally Posted by ljsevern
So basically you can censor opinions that disagree with you, and so you can't have people proving you wrong?
De-recommended.
Like i said, there is options with No recommended, recommended. That option is for, to avoid, flames.not for censor.
It doesn't matter what it is for, it will end up censoring people. If people read a suggestion that says "Remove all Subs", and agree's with it and recommends it, because there is nothing to persuade them that Submarines shouldn't be removed, then that is hugely wrong. There should always be the opportunity for someone to post their point of view with facts and evidence, and that is something I feel strongly about.
So you think not censoring people who flames, its ok? Do you think that is acceptable to be lucked when sometimes, a suggestion made by another player or me, its closed due to flammed? Well i dont think SDE will never delete submarines for 1 single reason; its a great source of earning profti, which i doubt submarines and PHH will ever be deleted from the game.Like i said Ljsevern, there will 2 options , recommend it or anti recommend it. If a players, wants to get a recommendations, he needs to post something good, if his thread is poorly organized and not enough " evidence, proof, good arguments like you were saying in the last 24 hours, then the reader just click either recomendations or not recommendations. Of course , everyone has the opportunity to participate, but we also, have the right to choose our methods to create our post, unless there is freedom to do so. I know as there is also, freedom of speech. But, this option its to DECREASE FLAMING.
You are not even reading what we are writing. You are associating disagreeing to flaming. You again play the victim by implying we are trying to delete subs from the game, while lj had simply given an exemple on how your suggestion could be harmful. I don't know what more we can say, you refuse to listen, and you are stubbornly camping on your position and arguing against arguments that weren't made.
|
-
Re : Suggestion: FORUM new tool/
09. 02. 2011 20:48
ljsevern
|
Flames can be removed by Forum Mods. That is what they are there for.
However, you need to have the opinion to teach and show people that they are incorrect and give your point of view.
People need the opportunity to give their point of view and debate in a mature manner with facts and evidence.
|
-
Re : Suggestion: FORUM new tool/
09. 02. 2011 21:18
Humberto20
|
Originally Posted by aingeal
Originally Posted by Humberto20
Originally Posted by ljsevern
Originally Posted by Humberto20
Originally Posted by ljsevern
So basically you can censor opinions that disagree with you, and so you can't have people proving you wrong?
De-recommended.
Like i said, there is options with No recommended, recommended. That option is for, to avoid, flames.not for censor.
It doesn't matter what it is for, it will end up censoring people. If people read a suggestion that says "Remove all Subs", and agree's with it and recommends it, because there is nothing to persuade them that Submarines shouldn't be removed, then that is hugely wrong. There should always be the opportunity for someone to post their point of view with facts and evidence, and that is something I feel strongly about.
So you think not censoring people who flames, its ok? Do you think that is acceptable to be lucked when sometimes, a suggestion made by another player or me, its closed due to flammed? Well i dont think SDE will never delete submarines for 1 single reason; its a great source of earning profti, which i doubt submarines and PHH will ever be deleted from the game.Like i said Ljsevern, there will 2 options , recommend it or anti recommend it. If a players, wants to get a recommendations, he needs to post something good, if his thread is poorly organized and not enough " evidence, proof, good arguments like you were saying in the last 24 hours, then the reader just click either recomendations or not recommendations. Of course , everyone has the opportunity to participate, but we also, have the right to choose our methods to create our post, unless there is freedom to do so. I know as there is also, freedom of speech. But, this option its to DECREASE FLAMING.
You are not even reading what we are writing. You are associating disagreeing to flaming. You again play the victim by implying we are trying to delete subs from the game, while lj had simply given an exemple on how your suggestion could be harmful. I don't know what more we can say, you refuse to listen, and you are stubbornly camping on your position and arguing against arguments that weren't made.
actually, i was doing a question to you. But ljsevern asnwered it for you.
|
-
Re : Suggestion: FORUM new tool/
09. 02. 2011 21:31
aingeal
|
Originally Posted by Humberto20
Originally Posted by aingeal
Originally Posted by Humberto20
Originally Posted by ljsevern
Originally Posted by Humberto20
Like i said, there is options with No recommended, recommended.
That option is for, to avoid, flames.not for censor.
It doesn't matter what it is for, it will end up censoring people. If people read a suggestion that says "Remove all Subs", and agree's with it and recommends it, because there is nothing to persuade them that Submarines shouldn't be removed, then that is hugely wrong. There should always be the opportunity for someone to post their point of view with facts and evidence, and that is something I feel strongly about.
So you think not censoring people who flames, its ok? Do you think that is acceptable to be lucked when sometimes, a suggestion made by another player or me, its closed due to flammed? Well i dont think SDE will never delete submarines for 1 single reason; its a great source of earning profti, which i doubt submarines and PHH will ever be deleted from the game.Like i said Ljsevern, there will 2 options , recommend it or anti recommend it. If a players, wants to get a recommendations, he needs to post something good, if his thread is poorly organized and not enough " evidence, proof, good arguments like you were saying in the last 24 hours, then the reader just click either recomendations or not recommendations. Of course , everyone has the opportunity to participate, but we also, have the right to choose our methods to create our post, unless there is freedom to do so. I know as there is also, freedom of speech. But, this option its to DECREASE FLAMING.
You are not even reading what we are writing. You are associating disagreeing to flaming. You again play the victim by implying we are trying to delete subs from the game, while lj had simply given an exemple on how your suggestion could be harmful. I don't know what more we can say, you refuse to listen, and you are stubbornly camping on your position and arguing against arguments that weren't made.
actually, i was doing a question to you. But ljsevern asnwered it for you.
That doesnt make sense...
|
-
Re : Suggestion: FORUM new tool/
09. 03. 2011 02:15
leaderwolf
|
Originally Posted by aingeal
Originally Posted by Humberto20
Originally Posted by aingeal
Originally Posted by Humberto20
Originally Posted by ljsevern
It doesn't matter what it is for, it will end up censoring people. If people read a suggestion that says "Remove all Subs", and agree's with it and recommends it, because there is nothing to persuade them that Submarines shouldn't be removed, then that is hugely wrong. There should always be the opportunity for someone to post their point of view with facts and evidence, and that is something I feel strongly about.
So you think not censoring people who flames, its ok? Do you think that is acceptable to be lucked when sometimes, a suggestion made by another player or me, its closed due to flammed? Well i dont think SDE will never delete submarines for 1 single reason; its a great source of earning profti, which i doubt submarines and PHH will ever be deleted from the game.Like i said Ljsevern, there will 2 options , recommend it or anti recommend it. If a players, wants to get a recommendations, he needs to post something good, if his thread is poorly organized and not enough " evidence, proof, good arguments like you were saying in the last 24 hours, then the reader just click either recomendations or not recommendations. Of course , everyone has the opportunity to participate, but we also, have the right to choose our methods to create our post, unless there is freedom to do so. I know as there is also, freedom of speech. But, this option its to DECREASE FLAMING.
You are not even reading what we are writing. You are associating disagreeing to flaming. You again play the victim by implying we are trying to delete subs from the game, while lj had simply given an exemple on how your suggestion could be harmful. I don't know what more we can say, you refuse to listen, and you are stubbornly camping on your position and arguing against arguments that weren't made.
actually, i was doing a question to you. But ljsevern asnwered it for you.
That doesnt make sense...
If people is see : vote nr 1 forum troll,we know who is are,or other self links stuck of NF isn't necessary to do a New king of flea.WE VOTE. Good Topic RECOM
|
-
Re : Suggestion: FORUM new tool/
09. 03. 2011 02:43
aingeal
|
Originally Posted by leaderwolf
Originally Posted by aingeal
That doesnt make sense...
If people is see : vote nr 1 forum troll,we know who is are,or other self links stuck of NF isn't necessary to do a New king of flea.WE VOTE. Good Topic RECOM
King of flea? Seriously? You heard that passing by a kindergarden or something?
|
-
Re : Suggestion: FORUM new tool/
09. 03. 2011 03:02
leaderwolf
|
Originally Posted by aingeal
Originally Posted by leaderwolf
Originally Posted by aingeal
That doesnt make sense...
If people is see : vote nr 1 forum troll,we know who is are,or other self links stuck of NF isn't necessary to do a New king of flea.WE VOTE. Good Topic RECOM
King of flea? Seriously? You heard that passing by a kindergarden or something?
No dude go and read that book by William Golding King Of Flea the right Title in english is Lords of The Fleas,your ignorance is amuse my all time.
|
-
Re : Suggestion: FORUM new tool/
09. 03. 2011 03:29
ljsevern
|
Again, Altsein/Leaderwolf breaking the forum rules.
|
-
Re : Suggestion: FORUM new tool/
09. 03. 2011 05:14
free3play
|
Originally Posted by leaderwolf
Originally Posted by aingeal
Originally Posted by leaderwolf
Originally Posted by aingeal
That doesnt make sense...
If people is see : vote nr 1 forum troll,we know who is are,or other self links stuck of NF isn't necessary to do a New king of flea.WE VOTE. Good Topic RECOM
King of flea? Seriously? You heard that passing by a kindergarden or something?
No dude go and read that book by William Golding King Of Flea the right Title in english is Lords of The Flies,your ignorance is amuse my all time.
FFYP
|
-
Re : Suggestion: FORUM new tool/
09. 03. 2011 05:26
leaderwolf
|
Originally Posted by ljsevern
Again, Altsein/Leaderwolf breaking the forum rules.
However, you need to have the opinion to teach and show people that they are incorrect and give your point of view.
People need the opportunity to give their point of view and debate in a mature manner with facts and evidence.
Who is altsein? Again LJsevern is flame and breaking the forum rules.
|
|
|
