Community - Forum - View old data

Categories :  

General Discussion

  Index

  • Fast games or balanced games? - vote

    04. 07. 2011 19:34

vanity
After catching a fleet mate telling the host to go with a pcv and a cv1 in a gb2, it
made
me realise - do people simply not care about balance anymore?

Cast your vote; I will update as each page goes.

Wait for a balanced game or go as soon as you can.



To clarify, we are just talking about GB2 here.

Results:
I stopped counting since there are a lot of opinions posted that are not binary
answers.

However, for those interested it seems the majority are for fast games, although
there are still a reasonable number of people who would rather wait for more CV's -
whether it be for balance or merely for the hope that it will mean there is 1 cv for
each teams flanks.
  Index

  • Re : Fast games or balanced games? - vote

    04. 09. 2011 12:35

straswa
I prefer balanced games myself, with an equal number of CVs on each side.



  • Re : Fast games or balanced games? - vote

    04. 08. 2011 21:58

Hylian
fast...
cvs suck anyway

  • Re : Fast games or balanced games? - vote

    04. 08. 2011 21:09

bloodsky
Fast yet balanced games

Ex:
20/4-6

waiting for 8 cv takes too long >.<

  • Re : Fast games or balanced games? - vote

    04. 08. 2011 17:50

Gratza
It is obvious we need to keep the action up and the 5-10minute waiting rooms down (it
used to be worst but have been better after the merge)... However I dont think
anything will be done because navyfield is fails all over the place with these game
modes... like GB2 replacing GB1 (In kaiser at least).
LOSE HOPE AND LOSE CONTROL

  • Re : Fast games or balanced games? - vote

    04. 08. 2011 17:43

mako089
Then sometimes you wait a long time for "balance" just to find out that some players
have no idea what they are doing and the game ends up being one sided anyway.

  • Re : Fast games or balanced games? - vote

    04. 08. 2011 15:46

Germanybound
I perfer a balanced game instead of a fast slaughter type game. I hope I don't get
flamed for this LOL.

  • Re : Fast games or balanced games? - vote

    04. 08. 2011 15:31

berlim25
100% balance,no question about that.i think evrybody dont like to play blind,i dont.

  • Re : Fast games or balanced games? - vote

    04. 08. 2011 15:29

berlim25
100% balance,no question about that.i think evrybody dont like to play blind,i dont.

  • Re : Fast games or balanced games? - vote

    04. 08. 2011 10:43

Vawlkus
Neither, I go for a FUN game.

As for "go" spammers and the back-seat hosts, I just ban them for being disruptive. If they come back, then I note
their account names and ban them after I close the room.

I play a game to have fun, not pander to a bunch of twelve year old ADD brats who missed their ritalin meds.

Typically, a 4 CV room has a 1/4 chance of being balanced, if the host checks the cvs in the room.

  • Re : Fast games or balanced games? - vote

    04. 08. 2011 07:14

PinoyPower7
I had a game the other day that I was hosting it was at 20/4 with a pcv, 2 cv3s and a cv1 people told me to go. I
didn't go I told them to wait for better cvs then they all left. People are stupid.


I prefer balance because atleast I may have some vision
1 2 3 4 5 6 7