ID
Password
FlashGuide
FlashGuide
HA Infomation

General Discussion

  Index

  • Using inactive fleet to protect harbor

    10. 14. 2019 13:17


Sidumbledore

I do not want to get into fleet politics but I must ask this.  Why does fleet use inactive fleets to declare on its own harbor to protect it?  This is a common tactic used by Omega.  I understand that the HA time overlap is a strange situation in the new server.  But, this tactic of using an inactive fleet for sham declaration is unfair and takes away other fleet's right to play HA/HD.  If a fleet cannot play two HA/HD games that overlap in the same time zone, do not hold two harbors in that time zone.  Some fleets and players consider this as one fleet trying to control what HA/HD game other fleets can play by this type of manipulations.  Think about if someone creates sham fleets to declare on all harbors to completely shut down the HA/HD games, you will say that it is not acceptable because this takes away other fleet's rights to play HA/HD.  By the same logic, using inactive fleets for sham declaration is not an acceptable behavior.  If you do not have time, resource, or interest to defend, then, do not defend (for any reason including overlap HA/HD time).  Please do not use inactive fleets to protect your harbor.  If you want to attack but cannot defend at the same time, you have made your choice. 

 

  • Re : Using inactive fleet to protect harbor

    10. 20. 2019 04:52


Dario1971

A friend of mine was kicked out from one of those ghost fleets for daring to take a box in an HA, a GM should ask him, don't you think?

  • Re : Using inactive fleet to protect harbor

    10. 20. 2019 05:12


babyheart

Originally Posted by Aranicar

 

Wow, yes, it is not the same KT.  Look at this new "KnightsTemplar" fleet.  Search the ranking page on this website.  This new fleet was created by all dummy accounts except the fleet leader.  These dummy accounts all have no battle records and were logged in only once on the same day in August.  Isn't this an abuse of the system?  I am surprised that someone spent the time to do that.  This is a new low.  Someone should report this to the GM and ban whoever behind this. 




Why yes, when there is a will there is a way isn't it ? Not to be funny but that is why he could say the following.

Originally Posted by atofanei

Dear all , On behalf of Omegas Fleets i want to clear some thing for you , 

 

1- It's no easy to have two harbors , and also not easy to defend VS 4 Fleets combine together to Fight US ( bamf - RA - OSP - OSI ) 

2- again Km free to take for every one we only attacked it to shush some players specially in OSP that they don't have respect or honor .

3- you gather all none Chines players in navy and give them accounts to defend the KM and you faild again and again that is so Shame .

4- it's better for You guys to clam down and stop trash talks and come and face us again we will be waiting for you guys .

5- We beat your ( best BBs and Best CVs and also your SS ) so we made clear something , now all your fleets are naked without any Harbors but

KM is free if you guys want it , Thanks for all Good War we are waiting for you OFC you will attack SN .

 

Omegas

  • Re : Using inactive fleet to protect harbor

    10. 20. 2019 08:15


Sidumbledore

Originally Posted by atofanei

Dear all , On behalf of Omegas Fleets i want to clear some thing for you , 

 

1- It's no easy to have two harbors , and also not easy to defend VS 4 Fleets combine together to Fight US ( bamf - RA - OSP - OSI ) 

2- again Km free to take for every one we only attacked it to shush some players specially in OSP that they don't have respect or honor .

3- you gather all none Chines players in navy and give them accounts to defend the KM and you faild again and again that is so Shame .

4- it's better for You guys to clam down and stop trash talks and come and face us again we will be waiting for you guys .

5- We beat your ( best BBs and Best CVs and also your SS ) so we made clear something , now all your fleets are naked without any Harbors but

KM is free if you guys want it , Thanks for all Good War we are waiting for you OFC you will attack SN .

 

Omegas

GG today in KM HA/HD.  Too bad I missed HT, but I heard that it was a fair and good battle.  However, you are wrong on a few points in your post. 

First, there is no trash talking here in my posts.  They are all valid and fair comments.  Please point out what I stated in my posts is wrong.  We can discuss. 

Second, yes, Omega is a better team today.  It was a good battle.  However, I am surprised that you do not realize the dynamics in HA/HD.  There are always up and down in fleet battles.  There are many factors and mistakes that lead to wins and losses.  I am sure you know that with your experience (surprised by your #5 comment).  I also want to point out a few facts here.  I remember 2-4 months ago, Omega failed several times in capturing SN.  They also failed to capture and defend harbors from time to time.  Those losses were not because your fleet was not good, but because of many factors that could not be controlled at that time.  Do you realize that your #3 and #5 are trash talking (an irony here to your #4 point)?

Third, your point of who is ganging up against who is wrong.  Every fleet recurits new members.  Tell me if Omega did not absorb members from other fleets.  It is good to have 30-35 ships fighting against each other in HT.  No matter how many fleets you believe you are fighting against, it does not matter in HT.  There are only 35 ships max in HT.   

Fourth, I did not want to say this in my recent posts because I know many good players in Omega.  But, do you know why many players from BAMF, RA, and OSP want to play against Omega recently?  It is because of the tactics that were used by Omega (inactive fleet to block harbor, border humming skytrains, running APA out of the north border to win tiles).  I am glad that your fleet is no longer using them.  This is a good step forward for the NF HA/HD community. 

Hope there are more good battles to come in the future.

Oh, by the way, yes, the new "KnightTemplar" is a fleet with only dummy accounts (most likely all accounts created at the same time to just form a fleet for sham HA declaration).  I also checked the ranking webpage here.  That is a fact. 

 

  • Re : Using inactive fleet to protect harbor

    10. 20. 2019 08:32


worldedge

I think we can all agree that Ultras like to stretch the rules and eveyone else hates them.

That said they put up some great battles with us and I dont' want that to stop. 


GG to Ultras today. Well played from what I hear.

Naf you're a tool Mario you're cousin follower who should have listened.

Both great players I'd want on my team anytime but both complete aholes.

Take it any way you want. It's simply the truth. 

austinpage

  • Re : Using inactive fleet to protect harbor

    10. 20. 2019 21:03


Xiliki

Originally Posted by atofanei

1- It's no easy to have two harbors , and also not easy to defend VS 4 Fleets combine together to Fight US ( bamf - RA - OSP - OSI ) 


Wow! I see that the number of enemies you have defeated each time becomes more and more.( bamf - RA - OSP - OSI ) OSI ? Who's this?

I want to give an explanation.  Fleet RA made the decision and stopped playing on the Chinese server back in may 2019. It's funny to see how the few people still left in this project are considered a serious force. This is all the more strange when you consider the presence of a much larger number of Chinese accounts in your fleet.

  • Re : Using inactive fleet to protect harbor

    10. 21. 2019 03:32


det_ka

Originally Posted by Xiliki

Originally Posted by atofanei

1- It's no easy to have two harbors , and also not easy to defend VS 4 Fleets combine together to Fight US ( bamf - RA - OSP - OSI ) 


Wow! I see that the number of enemies you have defeated each time becomes more and more.( bamf - RA - OSP - OSI ) OSI ? Who's this?

I want to give an explanation.  Fleet RA made the decision and stopped playing on the Chinese server back in may 2019. It's funny to see how the few people still left in this project are considered a serious force. This is all the more strange when you consider the presence of a much larger number of Chinese accounts in your fleet.


Best player all server xiliki pm now all listen him!!!

  • Re : Using inactive fleet to protect harbor

    10. 21. 2019 03:33


det_ka

Originally Posted by worldedge

I think we can all agree that Ultras like to stretch the rules and eveyone else hates them.

That said they put up some great battles with us and I dont' want that to stop. 


GG to Ultras today. Well played from what I hear.

Naf you're a tool Mario you're cousin follower who should have listened.

Both great players I'd want on my team anytime but both complete aholes.

Take it any way you want. It's simply the truth. 

austinpage


GG austin^^

  • Re : Using inactive fleet to protect harbor

    10. 21. 2019 04:55


URRS

[CITA = atofanei]

Queridos, en nombre de Omegas Fleets quiero aclararles algo, 

 

1- No es fácil tener dos puertos, y tampoco es fácil defender las flotas VS 4 combinadas para luchar contra EE. UU. (Bamf - RA - OSP - OSI) 

2- nuevamente Kilómetros libres para tomar por cada uno, solo lo atacamos para callar a algunos jugadores especialmente en OSP que no tienen respeto ni honor.

3- reúnes a todos los jugadores chinos en la marina y les das cuentas para defender el KM y te desvanezcas una y otra vez, eso es una pena.

4- es mejor que ustedes se callen y detengan las conversaciones basura y vengan a enfrentarnos nuevamente, los estaremos esperando.

5- Vencimos a tus (mejores BB y mejores CV y ??también a tus SS) así que dejamos en claro algo, ahora todas tus flotas están desnudas sin ningún puerto pero

KM es gratis si ustedes lo quieren, gracias por toda Good War que estamos esperando OFC atacarán SN.

 

Omegas





Sabes que es lo más divertido que hablan de honor y respeto .....

 

Tengo una desafortunada cantidad de capturas de personas de su flota que insultan a Maria Santisima en HA ... por mala suerte entiendo español, ¿también habla de honor? ¿Cuándo usan exploit y border jump? es ese tu honor? .... pero oye, tienes que quitarle las cosas a quien venga ... hablan de que OSP y BAMF son 4 flotas, los omegas no están muy lejos, tienen gente de Brasil para siempre, gente del novato de FG, gente de ARA, gente de ACH, de AH, DTF o 205th (alemanes), Ex KT ... ¡No sé cuánto te disculpas si tu flota tiene la misma lechada que todos! Me refiero a ser juicioso.

 

No creo que sean esa flota que dicen ser, ni son los mejores para jactarse de que vencieron a su mejor BB / CV / SS ... ahora en un HA muchas cosas pueden variar y pueden ocurrir variantes ... como todos los altibajos de la flota. ....

 

antes que nada hablas de honor, respeto y juego ... Luego, deja que det_ka e izzmial dejen de poner cuentas compradas por todos los siervos benditos ... ya estamos podridos de que él esté poniendo cuentas por todas las flotas

  • Re : Using inactive fleet to protect harbor

    10. 21. 2019 11:54


Xiliki

Originally Posted by det_ka

Best player all server xiliki pm now all listen him!!!


Does that mean you just don't have anything to say?

  • Re : Using inactive fleet to protect harbor

    10. 21. 2019 22:03


whitegoli

I find it funny how OSP and BAMF still try to deny it.

 

Even tho that RA may be gone, their players split up and went into different fleets or did stay in RA. They still do merc for OSP and BAMF tho.

I can also fully confirm that OSP mercs for ?子.CHN, noticed it when gefro and a lot of players logged in during HT against ZGL.

 

To be honest, I've had enough of this mercing and covering up. It's enough now.

 

It's completely understandable that Ultras got a ghost fleet blocking their harbor, there's no fun in playing against 3 times your numbers, cuz u got BAMF, OSP, RA and whatever sht in there teaming up.

Apart from that, the matches between OSP and BAMF I know too well, it's not like they try hard, it's just casual matches. I still remember that we went against OSP and were told that it wasn't much needed to come, because it was just a ''fun match'' to train.

 

Stop covering your arses, it's enough now, we all know that OSP, BAMF, RA and whatever thefk u got there work together to some extend. This all comes out of OSP btw, they got their hand in pretty much everything. But it doesn't matter, no matter what you say or scream at them, they all pretend it doesn't exist.

 

Ultras has all right to get their harbor blocked and have a ''fun match'' with their friends.

 

If you want to have them stop blocking their harbor, you should also find a trade-off for that. That being mercing.

Because if I remember correct, karma banned lots of players unrightfully but he atleast tried to do something against the mercing shit.

 

so its more than fair to block your harbor against a fleet that mercs with 3 other fleets.

 

 

so to you austin:

 

''I think that BAMF, OSP and whatever u got there like to stretch the rules and everyone hates them''

1 2 3 4 5 6 7