PST Time 00:00:00GMT-8
Local Server Time 00:00:00GMT+8
ID
Password
FlashGuide
FlashGuide
HA Infomation

General Discussion
Forum Quick Menu

  Index

  • Using inactive fleet to protect harbor

    10. 14. 2019 13:17


Sidumbledore

I do not want to get into fleet politics but I must ask this.  Why does fleet use inactive fleets to declare on its own harbor to protect it?  This is a common tactic used by Omega.  I understand that the HA time overlap is a strange situation in the new server.  But, this tactic of using an inactive fleet for sham declaration is unfair and takes away other fleet's right to play HA/HD.  If a fleet cannot play two HA/HD games that overlap in the same time zone, do not hold two harbors in that time zone.  Some fleets and players consider this as one fleet trying to control what HA/HD game other fleets can play by this type of manipulations.  Think about if someone creates sham fleets to declare on all harbors to completely shut down the HA/HD games, you will say that it is not acceptable because this takes away other fleet's rights to play HA/HD.  By the same logic, using inactive fleets for sham declaration is not an acceptable behavior.  If you do not have time, resource, or interest to defend, then, do not defend (for any reason including overlap HA/HD time).  Please do not use inactive fleets to protect your harbor.  If you want to attack but cannot defend at the same time, you have made your choice. 

 

  • Re : Using inactive fleet to protect harbor

    11. 01. 2019 22:00


worldedge

On a serious note. I do not think it is on their agenda white. I mean it could be somethng they're looking into but in all honesty mercs have been part of the game since the beginning.
It would require a lot of work on their part to control it (They don't have that time) and it doesn't really benefit any one fleet. If anything it makes the HAs more enjoyable, competetive and full. I've been on both ends of this so I know the frustration. But now all I want to do is play and have fun in HAs with as many players as possible. Showing up for a battle with 15 guys or less isn't my idea of fun. We gotta make the most of what we got, no?

  • Re : Using inactive fleet to protect harbor

    11. 02. 2019 08:53


Aranicar

Originally Posted by worldedge

On a serious note. I do not think it is on their agenda white. I mean it could be somethng they're looking into but in all honesty mercs have been part of the game since the beginning.
It would require a lot of work on their part to control it (They don't have that time) and it doesn't really benefit any one fleet. If anything it makes the HAs more enjoyable, competetive and full. I've been on both ends of this so I know the frustration. But now all I want to do is play and have fun in HAs with as many players as possible. Showing up for a battle with 15 guys or less isn't my idea of fun. We gotta make the most of what we got, no?

Very good points.  Agreed with you, but I don't think he (whitegolia) is listening.  He just doesn't want to lose an argument when he cannot defend it. 

It is difficult to enforce a "no mercing" rule.  To put "banning merc" into context, it means banning any accounts who are used by more than one person.  If you look at it that way, all fleets (Ultra, BAMF, OSP, 明日帝國, 中國藍, bunny, Chilena) all are doing this. 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7