Community - Forum - View old data

Categories :  

Suggestions

  Index

  • Credit Deposit for Harbour Attack

    04. 05. 2009 08:34

ljsevern
100 million credits (or whatever amount works, I just picked a random amount) as a deposit
to declare on a harbour, which you get back if:

- Reach the harbour tile

- Get X% of you deposit back if you withdraw within a certain period of time, such as 1 hour.

This should help stop/limit the effects of pathetic joke fleets trying to waste time, and
in turn blocking HA for fleets that actually want to play.

Please discuss this idea. I bumped a similar thread, which was asking for a cost.
  Index

  • Re : Credit Deposit for Harbour Attack

    04. 13. 2011 21:40

snow_ball
Well, in your example with the jedi fleet... maybe the attacking fleet was a small
fleet of theirs... and they where basically cheeting to keep the harbour theirs.

In that case, the fleet that was constantly declaring, but really not playing... should
be disbanned... or atleast warned about it before doing so.


But raising the price of attacking won't do much... think of it... If a fleet was declaring
on their harbour with a secondary made fleet... they would just keep funding it until
their fleet was disbanned.


So I say "NO" to raising the price for attacking, But "YES" to the option of
getting "X" ammount back if you withdrawl in a certain period of time. (If abused, the
abusing fleet would be disbanned)

As for the getting your credits back if you reach the harbour tile...I dont think this is
nessisary... Because you got there... you just didn't win it. (The dummy fleet could
be sent down to the harbour tile and just lose there too... remember that) SO I
say "NO" to getting all credis back if you reach the harbour.


After all... what fleet gets the attack is all on who gets there first... and if a new fleet
want's to try to take a harbour... let them. Even if they lose a few times and try
again and again.... as long as it's not a dummy fleet... let it go.


A better Idea would be to have SDE open up the French and Soviet harbours...
Wouldn't it not? That would make more opertunities to play an HA with those new
harbours open... SDE just might have to have it on a different day is all... Because
I'm sure with 2 HA's running at the same time... The server's would crash or their
would be some major desyncs/ bugs.


But if i'm missing your point, forgive me... I have not been in an HA where the
attacking fleet was a "noob force" or a "joke force". The one's I have been in are
ones where fleets really were trying to take the harbour from us... But who knows...
maybe it's because I came from the YO Server, and we didn't have that issue there...

  • Re : Credit Deposit for Harbour Attack

    04. 12. 2011 17:39

Falcon91
I gave it my rec lj, but i would lower it a bit.

This is also just coming from a player who's dirt poor but anyways.

  • Re : Credit Deposit for Harbour Attack

    04. 12. 2011 12:51

ZaGaTo19
reccd in order to avoid this:

  • Re : Credit Deposit for Harbour Attack

    04. 12. 2011 12:48

ljsevern
Bumping because I want this implemented. Do you have a problem with that?

  • Re : Credit Deposit for Harbour Attack

    04. 12. 2011 11:31

Falcon91
@iron he made the thread he can bump it you have a issue talk to a FM

  • Re : Credit Deposit for Harbour Attack

    04. 12. 2011 11:13

iron_mask




bumping for any particular reason ?? ... .. ... or just practicing thread necromancy ??




  • Re : Credit Deposit for Harbour Attack

    04. 12. 2011 10:02

ljsevern
Bump

  • Re : Credit Deposit for Harbour Attack

    03. 16. 2011 12:16

ljsevern
Bump

  • Re : Credit Deposit for Harbour Attack

    04. 08. 2009 23:26

angus725
me and sumofallwars are having a friendly debate, as of this time, i dont have the
time to keep the debate up, i'll make my comeback tommorrow.

  • Re : Credit Deposit for Harbour Attack

    04. 08. 2009 16:15

mchen
recommended. good idea for az harbors. I don't know about the Ny and MO harbors. but from
what i heard 100 mil would be way to high for those servers so maybe have a different rate
for each server?
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9