Well, in your example with the jedi fleet... maybe the attacking fleet was a small fleet of theirs... and they where basically cheeting to keep the harbour theirs.
In that case, the fleet that was constantly declaring, but really not playing... should be disbanned... or atleast warned about it before doing so.
But raising the price of attacking won't do much... think of it... If a fleet was declaring on their harbour with a secondary made fleet... they would just keep funding it until their fleet was disbanned.
So I say "NO" to raising the price for attacking, But "YES" to the option of getting "X" ammount back if you withdrawl in a certain period of time. (If abused, the abusing fleet would be disbanned)
As for the getting your credits back if you reach the harbour tile...I dont think this is nessisary... Because you got there... you just didn't win it. (The dummy fleet could be sent down to the harbour tile and just lose there too... remember that) SO I say "NO" to getting all credis back if you reach the harbour.
After all... what fleet gets the attack is all on who gets there first... and if a new fleet want's to try to take a harbour... let them. Even if they lose a few times and try again and again.... as long as it's not a dummy fleet... let it go.
A better Idea would be to have SDE open up the French and Soviet harbours... Wouldn't it not? That would make more opertunities to play an HA with those new harbours open... SDE just might have to have it on a different day is all... Because I'm sure with 2 HA's running at the same time... The server's would crash or their would be some major desyncs/ bugs.
But if i'm missing your point, forgive me... I have not been in an HA where the attacking fleet was a "noob force" or a "joke force". The one's I have been in are ones where fleets really were trying to take the harbour from us... But who knows... maybe it's because I came from the YO Server, and we didn't have that issue there...
|