Dont get me wrong, there are still mercs on AZ. Just less then there were before (or it
could be that the primary fleet of merc users has fallen apart)

Maybe on AZ. Mercs on MO are still at large.

Its better then it was before with the 4 day.

"The two week rule is there to prevent mercs."

Its not working.

The two week rule is there to prevent mercs.

What would merging NY and MO accomplish? Can any fleet on NY field MORE then 30-40 BB6s?
And dozens of CV6s?

If the answer is yes, then all thats gonna happen on MO is more HAs.


As for the rule, it would be nice to see the fleet leaving penalty bumped up to 3 weeks.

all you have proven is MO/NY are dead servers compared to AZ and maybe a change
in those servers are the answer, not the 1 harbor rule

maybe lifting the 2 week restriction would get battles going again

http://www.navyfield.com/board/view.asp?Num=163220&Sort=C06

http://www.navyfield.com/board/view.asp?Num=164545&Sort=C06

"It will happen as we said it would."

many wholes in there s0l:

first of all I havent seen a single mega back out of a HA yet, and we have seen the
harbors thus far change hands many times already, so to say the 1 harbor rule has
destroyed HAs is very far fetched

as for smaller fleets getting what a multible harbor fleet wont defend, is crazy, all it
will do is tie up more harbors to two or three fleets for a long time, if a fleet seizes a
harbor you think they will just let it go because they already have one, in my almost
6 years of playing this game has that ever been the case, not once, and I dont
believe in your theroy of it happening now

all this is, is megas are getting bored, and instead of doing FWs and such like they
tell others to do, they try to rationalize owning only 1 harbor, too its hurting them

and I 100% disagree with this, I have yet to see a mega fall apart because of this
rule and wont see it in the future as well

and by the way s0l most mega these days are made in weeks not years

God knows why I'm arguing with the brick wall again, but oh well here it goes.

First of all, the 1 harbour per fleet rule doesn't allow smaller fleets to get a harbour.
On the contrary, it will cause the so called mega fleets to hold on to their harbour
tightly. Unless of course they grow bored, like on AZ, and let go. In that case it
completely annihilates the purpose of HAs (ie bringing all you have, numbers, skill,
tactics, ...).

I can tell you now that if the current situation does not change, none of the top fleets
will bother with HAs anymore. The result will be that nobody will give a flying f**k about
HAs, as the entire server will know that the current owners aren't the best fleets and the
only reason they have a harbour is because the best fleets don't care.

In the past the fleets that held multiple harbours usually had 1 main harbour they
defended as well as possible, while the rest was just for fun. Do you want an opportunity
to take a harbour as a smaller fleet? Well there was your opportunity, SDE removed it.

Also, the mega fleets you're talking about worked hard for years to become what they are
now. Then you come in whining you can't take a harbour with your 5 month-old fleet.
Want to hold a harbour? No problem, work for it and you might get there one day.
Want to enjoy HA? Easy, attack a harbour and enjoy.
You can't expect your fleet to be a HA force a couple of months after it was created,
you'll have to live with it.

Coming from a guy in a mini skirt err.. fleet.

Have a nice day.

Oh and recc'd.