Community - Forum - View old data

Categories :  

General Discussion

  Index

  • False complaints = temporary ban for the complainer?

    05. 31. 2011 15:41

Starluck
Greetings,



I submit that any player that submits a complaint that is investigated by a
Moderator and the conclusion that the player doesnt know the rules should result in
a temporary ban to teach these people to read all the rules on game play and forum
posting.

My reasons why:

#1 I have been threatend by one game mod humping ships with my sub.

#2 I have been threated by one game mod for asserting that Fleet Team NF
players are consideredc a priority target and we enjoy sinking them.

#3 I have multiple players complain and threatend to have me banned every time
I hump a ship for air in my submarine. I am forced to defend myself and screen
capture the text chat exchange incase #1 and/or #2 happen again. Even mods
have to learn the rules. Precise/exact rules addressing every situation has not yet
been concluded and are under developement, but humping has been precisely
defined as legal any/which/way you can manage it.

#4 I notice that every time an issue regarding humping is brought up including the
use of border humping with planes and ships, the post get locked because the issue
has been settle years ago yet there is no effort or way to force every player to learn
and acknowledge all the rules resulting in false complaints which are sometimes
taken seriously by game mods.

#5 Players attempt to turn posts in to player bashing, or trying to go off topic.
There is a brand new set of rules the forum moderators must follow. These new
rules coorelated to the fact that players either dont know the rules or refuse to
follow them.

Question: Why should players whom follow all the rules undergo player bashing, in
game threats and harrasment simply because players dont know the rules. Its ok to
disagree with the rules, but not know the rules is no excuse to attack other players
regardless of which rules you disagree with this would include the follow:

BBs without Scouts
CVs without Fighters
Ships humping the borders
Aircraft humping the borders
BBs with smaller guns
Submarines humping ships without guns or HH to defend themselves
  Index

  • Re : False complaints = temporary ban for the complainer?

    05. 31. 2011 19:33

devildog8
and yet another flame thread has appeared, can this be locked before it turns into
15 pages of hot air

  • Re : False complaints = temporary ban for the complainer?

    05. 31. 2011 19:30

Splid
"I've been oneshot by SS3/4 far more times then I've oneshot one. "

Same.

  • Re : False complaints = temporary ban for the complainer?

    05. 31. 2011 19:30

silentsubusa
Wow! i must not see much then! or maybe selective sight?

  • Re : False complaints = temporary ban for the complainer?

    05. 31. 2011 19:29

V2CxBongRipz
"yes, sub can easily destroy BB? maybe, but how many times have you seen a BB
oneshoot a SS? SS oneshoot a BB? "

I've been oneshot by SS3/4 far more times then I've oneshot one.

  • Re : False complaints = temporary ban for the complainer?

    05. 31. 2011 19:26

silentsubusa
yes, sub can easily destroy BB? maybe, but how many times have you seen a BB
oneshoot a SS? SS oneshoot a BB?

  • Re : False complaints = temporary ban for the complainer?

    05. 31. 2011 19:24

silentsubusa
Well sorry that i'm a noob! the point is, so many BB are left at end of game, and CV, but
not SS. SS die first, even at high levels. But this is off topic. Back to starlucks delima,
false complaints and temp ban.

  • Re : False complaints = temporary ban for the complainer?

    05. 31. 2011 19:24

Splid
"LOL ljsevern, have you tried to play SS1 or SS2? or even SS3? overpowered? yeah
right. subs have been nerfed so much they are barely playable now. Frankly, if you
watch a sub in the game play, you may notice that 8/10 times the sub ends up being
oneshooted by a BB. 1/10 times the sub oneshoots a BB. Also, simply by means of
comparison, Consider this: How many BB are left at the end of an average game? How
many subs? see what i mean? "

Pretty sure he has an SS4. Oh, and this opinion is shared by the exclusive SS players
within Jedi, are you going to call them on it as well?


As for nerfs to subs, I think you are being a bit lax with the truth here. SS34s can
still EASILY destroy BBs, and they can even easily destroy them without even hitting them
due to splash damage. As for your "consider this", how many Sub Drivers would rather keep
pushing into enemy territory on the off chance of a BB or CV Kill rather than retreat back
to their lines and recover their air?

As for SS12, they are less than BB2 level, they aren't supposed to do much.

Just because every sub in the game rushes the enemy lines and tries to kill as much as
possible without even TRYING to survive doesn't mean you can mangle statistics as to the
fact they are dead... But well done for trying.

  • Re : False complaints = temporary ban for the complainer?

    05. 31. 2011 19:22

V2CxBongRipz
Being unable to do attack in a sub says alot about a player silent.

  • Re : False complaints = temporary ban for the complainer?

    05. 31. 2011 19:21

Nachmorsi
^
Wow.

  • Re : False complaints = temporary ban for the complainer?

    05. 31. 2011 19:19

silentsubusa
LOL ljsevern, have you tried to play SS1 or SS2? or even SS3? overpowered? yeah
right. subs have been nerfed so much they are barely playable now. Frankly, if you
watch a sub in the game play, you may notice that 8/10 times the sub ends up being
oneshooted by a BB. 1/10 times the sub oneshoots a BB. Also, simply by means of
comparison, Consider this: How many BB are left at the end of an average game? How
many subs? see what i mean?
1 2 3 4 5 6 7