To all thos who belive that a court trial was needed for bin laden or he did not
deserve
to die i say this...

Do that person deserve to live, its not about deserving death its about deserving to
live... Its not taking a life its simply not allowing that person to continue to live...
Do rappest & murders deserve to live....
Evil wins when good men do nothing...


Also with that say today are you living or alive...
Myself I can say in a given week 6 out of 7 days Im just living but its nights like these
i am alive....

If you think I am a full on A-hole you Dont know me & Thos that do know me know
the truth...
Signing off from Sunny San Diego

@whu

Your wrong actually, the Canadians and aussies in world war one were know as storm troopers

The germans are known as Sturm troopers same name different era's.

a valid quote to verify my statement

""THE CANADIANS WERE MARKED OUT AS STORM TROOPS; FOR THE REMAINDER OF THE WAR THEY WERE
BROUGHT IN TO HEAD THE ASSAULT IN ONE GREAT BATTLE AFTER ANOTHER. WHENEVER THE GERMANS
FOUND THE CANADIAN CORPS COMING INTO THE LINE THEY PREPARED FOR THE WORST."

--BRITISH PRIME MINISTER LLOYD GEORGE, AFTER THE CAPTURE OF VIMY RIDGE "

link for said quote: http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-111503132.html


Also another reference look at the bottom answer
http://ca.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20080625070856AA1jGLM

1. Whether killing bin laden was right or not doesn't make much difference at this point.
It's not like a government can declare it undone and unshoot the bullets out of him.
2.About damn time
3.where the hell did the conversation about Canada's military come from?
4. To be fair, if the americans and their multi-trillion dollar (as in $1 followed by 12
zeros) war machine wanted to, they could reduce every structure over 2 feet tall and every
living creature to dust with their 20000 nuclear warheads in the span of ...about an hour,
so I can't really say much about them

Why the world will never see a *true* peace........

read this thread. Too many altercations of opinions over trivial BS. Humans are all
screwed in the head.

"were called stormtroopers for a damn good reason."

errmmm those would be German... not Canadian...

Along with storms post canadian battle achievements


Vimy

Juno, along with multiple other battles and operations within world war two.

Holding the line in WW1 when all other forces retreated

Canada also did multiple ops in Korea, and fly air support and did multiple ground support
missions in Desert Storm, and in the recent iraq war canadian EOD teams were brought in by
the US military to help disarm the massive amount of IED's in Iraq and the engineers to
help rebuild parts of iraq.

People discredit us but like i said, were called stormtroopers for a damn good reason.

"so if we are at war hidden any person who is the enemy must go thru a court before
shot? we are at war with a terrorist he is a terrorist case closed, his fate was sealed
when the US declared war on terrorist, there is no court for that, never has been
never will, get real"

Do you real want to say, that it is possible to declare a war on one person? War can only
be declared against states, not against human beings or terrorists. Therefor all war laws
are not in use.

And to correct you, there is such a court, even in the usa there are courts that would be
able to judge military and civil, and there is an international high court in den haag,
where f.e. cases from the war in the former republic of yugoslavia are held. So there are
legal methods, and no you cant declare war on terrorism as it would be difficult to
declare war on stupidity or thunderstorms or on other terms who do not apply to the
definition of states and/or countries.

"and I guess the 20 or so videos of him saying he was responsable isnt proof? "

so when i upload 20 videos of claiming i invented the word, it is proof enough that i
invented the word?


"so your saying its ok to kill 3000 ppl without a court,"
No it is not, but killing 3000 or 1 is only the difference in the number not in the way it
is done.

"but if one guy gets killed you call foulplay"
it is the same foulplay as it was in NY

"he deserved what he got plain and simple, call it what you will, but he was a very bad
man, and justice was served, reguarless whether he was armed at the time or not, war isnt
pretty, you best realize that ppl die in wars and let god sort it out "
again, just because fox-news or cnn have headlines like "war on terror" it is legally just
a stupid headline, cause you cant declare war on terror, this is technically impossible,
thats the reason why the usa is not in war against iraq or afghanistan, they found
different terms for that, like disarming.
I am not a judge and i dont have the evidences that would proof him guilty or not guilty,
so I cannot judge him, it is highly possible that he is guilty, but this is something that
has to be found by a court and not by people whos only information sources are the media.

so if we are at war hidden any person who is the enemy must go thru a court before
shot? we are at war with a terrorist he is a terrorist case closed, his fate was sealed
when the US declared war on terrorist, there is no court for that, never has been
never will, get real

and I guess the 20 or so videos of him saying he was responsable isnt proof? so
your saying its ok to kill 3000 ppl without a court, but if one guy gets killed you call
foulplay, he deserved what he got plain and simple, call it what you will, but he was
a very bad man, and justice was served, reguarless whether he was armed at the
time or not, war isnt pretty, you best realize that ppl die in wars and let god sort it
out

"Currently, you're condemning a team of 24 elite operators who removed an animal that
self-proclaimed responsibility for the deaths of thousands of INNOCENT, UNARMED Americans
and Afghanis."

If every person that claims it has killed this or that person should be killed instantly,
this would be ok then? It is not a removement if a human being is killed, it is homicide
and stays homicide as long as there is no court who found that person guilty by the law.
If you deny that there are rules that have to be followed by everyone, and everyone
includes the president of the usa aswell as a terrorist, the pope or your neighbour, you
are talking about anarchy or dictatorship then, but not about democracy or state of law.

> Canadians have waaaay too much pride in their military.

Hey, Canadian sons stormed Juno beach on D-Day, sustaining approximately 1,000 of the
10,000 allied casualties that day. As far as I'm concerned, they've earned bragging
rights. =)