I see nothing wrong with T4 being at 115...... I agree with LJ that its an end game fighter.

Only thing I don't like is the sight range changes they are discussing........seems to me that CV's are becoming increasingly RARE in normal game play IE GB's decreasing the sight range for any aircraft will diminish normal daily game play IMO.

As it is I've timed out of 3 rooms in a row waiting for a SINGLE CV to enter this morning.....

Something needs to be done about CV game play all together.


When they had the CV event going..... CV's were everywhere!!! should be a very strong hint as to what needs to be done.

As for me i'm shutting the game off as i'm getting tired of waiting for rooms to start that never do.

So your saying don't change T4 to lvl 115 because T3's will get eaten?


Seriously?


Well what about those poor little T2's getting eaten by those big over powered T3's?

Or those poor little BB5's getting eaten by those big mean BB6?

OK sarcasm off!!


I don't understand your thinking........ big fish eat little fish......whats the problem here?



"The problem is that CV play is too level dependent, what needs to be changed is to make the gameplay more skill based and less level based. So that CV players at a lower level are still capable of doing something besides just feeding planes into a meat grinder."


Exactly why I see no reason to decrease the sight range of Bombers in normal game play......... at least the sight range (dare I say Increase) would be beneficial to gameplay.

CV's also need to be rewarded for Damage dealt. That would decrease the FWing IMO and would increase CV play as a true lvling experience.

I really don't understand this "zomg T4s are unfair and will eat CVs making it not fun for people grinding to 115".

If the T4 fighters are so incredibly unbalanced that it will drive people from playing CV, why isn't it an issue now? Shouldn't it be an issue already since people would have to grind to whatever level they are now just to be competitive?

If it is an issue, then they should be balanced so that T3s can reasonably compete against T4s.

Of course, I don't think that is the issue as I'm pretty sure T3 can reasonably compete with T4 (someone correct me if I'm wrong)

T4 availble form lvl 115?

Sure no problem i have a IJN CV and i'm used to them getting utterly crushed everytime they encounter KM, MN or USN fighters.

So getting T4 a bit later makes no differnece to me. Just a bit more aircraft to send into the meat grinder... they never return anyway.

As I stated in the test forum discussion, I think LJs crusade for the T4 lvl increase is counter-productive. I agree with him on most issues, especially regarding BBs, but I would argue that:
-the difference between T4 and T3 Fighters is not as big as the difference between BB5s and BB3s.
-at lvl 100, T4s currently break up the grind nicely
-once you get your fighters to lvl 115, you are probably getting your CV6 unlocked, so why not spread out the new content more
-unless you change all of the fighter/bomber levels, 75/77 to 115 is the heart of the CV grind where new content would be nice

wasting time on this argument is not nearly as important as:
-getting unique CV6s for all nations
-properly balancing fighters
-making TBs more relevent in the game
-implementing any one of the hundreds of other unused CV suggestions

why dont they make some t5s for lvl 115 or 120 that only go on cv6
then there will be no problem

This is just another reason not to play NF.

The grind to L115 without premium is horrific. No reason to even bring the CV out anymore. Just get in the sub and demolish all the BBs I can find.

good luck trying to get 8 CVs anymore, without mega premimum giveaways.

Another ridiculous change.

If this becomes reality, I'll quit playing CV !
I have been raising my fighter pilots for more than 4 years.
Now that I finally reached lvl 103 I am absolutely pissed by that stupid idea.
I shall certainly not make a step backwards for another year or perhaps even more !