You've answered your question your self. Stick with it and you know, you will learn how to play NF faster when you actually play it, instead of being a chairgrinder and ask for freebies. In WoT the additional 20meter sight range does can or will allow a top tier tank to dominate, just like in NF.

I can see and shoot you at 500meters while you need to come to me to see me. Same concept of attack. ^^



I've done it, a lot has done it, no need to show you videos of us doing it. ^^


Anyways, I think I've said enough, as do the others. And like the others, I'll leave your thread. ^^ Can't teach something to a person that doesn't want to learn. ^^

Gl and Hf ^^

Thank you for leaving troll.

Someone lock this...

Pot calling the kettle black.

And in this case, its not even black.


He posted more arguments in one page, each and every one of them valid, than you did in the last year and you, due to your inability to counter his points decently, avoid the topic and insult him.

You act like a sulking 10 year old whose mother said "no candy before dinner".


You overlook factors that are crucial to the balance, because you cannot stand the tought that your idea is wrong, and that in your mind is more important than the game itself. You are a conceited kid since day one, and no matter how much we are actually nice and respectful of you personnaly, all you can do is be a total arse to anyone who brings arguments against your points and ideas.


In this particuliar case, you are overlooking the fact that in such games, damage is reduced, range has little impact. In NF, no matter the ship you shoot at, you do your fixed damage. Some level 60 ships sport firepower equal to the end game, at BB3 level, any battle is settled within 2-3 shots, no matter who is shooting at who.

Range as always been the advantage of the higher tier in NF, and going otherwise would mean redoing the game balance as its whole. You still failed to address how a simple reduction of range effectiveness for everyone would not create massive imbalance for nation with range as an advantage, and especially KM with firepower already lower than most.

You didn't address how it would create massive issue with what ship effectively armor and what ship do not. The fact AP would suddenly be useless.

You fail to have even a basic understanding of the game and its mechanic, an understanding most players that have a real interest in learning acquire by the time they hit their first BB1-2 or so.

This whole suggestion, has no arguments to explain how it would exactly help in a real game, other than some vague theory about reducing range effectiveness, an idea where the lower level ships would have even LESS effective range to go with their relatively lower firepower, with results that would probably not change anything, but are sure to screw up the balance.

The whole point is about someone that hasn't got enough skill to correctly play with the range, to know how you can counter a range advantage by using the battle dynamics to your advantage and that claims his own unwillingness to improve is an ISSUE that would require a total overhaul of the game balance?

And you call us elitists? That must be one of the most self-centered suggestion I ever seen, and you are proving once more to this community how much your ideas are ridiculous, and your lack of arguments is obvious to all, as you try to childishly loudmouth your way around any facts you don't like.


Grow up.

I don't know if you know how to read, but BB6s would retain their range advantage while allowing smaller ships to get in some shots every so often.

...other than some vague theory about reducing range effectiveness...

Your elitist attitude is what is killing this game. Just think about it instead of simply blindly insulting me for who I am.

If you want to bring insults and ad hominems while failing to bring arguments to the table then go to another thread.

Are you high?

ITT Retards who don't understand why NF is dying

Well I see we have another advocate for the 'Kill Navyfield Society'

Hard to use your advantages when you don't have any.

Thank you for leaving troll.

So when you disagree with something it's wrong?

No. The way you are being a total child about this is wrong.


Agreed with LJ, lock this thread, OP insults anyone that doesnt agree with him.

I don't see you proposing any valid counterarguments