PST Time 00:00:00GMT-8
Local Server Time 00:00:00GMT+8
ID
Password
FlashGuide
FlashGuide
HA Infomation

General Discussion
Forum Quick Menu

  Index

  • QV (UK)?????????

    07. 21. 2011 07:15


FastpOne
With all this updates and chatters does this mean QV/uk ships will be the weakest now :(

 

  • Re : QV (UK)?????????

    07. 22. 2011 23:17


angus725
Originally Posted by ljsevern

Originally Posted by angus725

Lukas, Average Kaiser salvo damage is lower than that of QV....

Proof:

Me with Kaiser, no AA was used although I did have my AA guns on. (if I did fire my AA guns once, the actual hitrate would be even higher)
http://i151.photobucket.com/albums/s139/angus725/NF/700kKaiser.png

NF attack records:
http://img27.imageshack.us/img27/7127/20429932.jpg

Same hitrate, QV has 70k more attack.


Do a full salvo damage test. You can't use that as proof as you could well have had more belt hits/hits against armour. It has been tested and proven Angus.


What's more useful? In game battles telling you an average damage per salvo via calculation, or closed tests were it's all theoretical values which are not likely to be reproduced in a real situation.

  • Re : QV (UK)?????????

    07. 23. 2011 01:21


ljsevern
Originally Posted by angus725

Originally Posted by ljsevern

Originally Posted by angus725

Lukas, Average Kaiser salvo damage is lower than that of QV....

Proof:

Me with Kaiser, no AA was used although I did have my AA guns on. (if I did fire my AA guns once, the actual hitrate would be even higher)
http://i151.photobucket.com/albums/s139/angus725/NF/700kKaiser.png

NF attack records:
http://img27.imageshack.us/img27/7127/20429932.jpg

Same hitrate, QV has 70k more attack.


Do a full salvo damage test. You can't use that as proof as you could well have had more belt hits/hits against armour. It has been tested and proven Angus.


What's more useful? In game battles telling you an average damage per salvo via calculation, or closed tests were it's all theoretical values which are not likely to be reproduced in a real situation.


A closed test where inconsistancies can be noted and controlled. Feel free to prove that the tests we have done are incorrect, and prove that all of your shells hit the same about of deck/belt as the QV, and prove that you and the QV hit the exact same targets.

  • Re : QV (UK)?????????

    07. 23. 2011 01:24


DJDeath
Do we know at what angle all the shots were fired? Do we know what ships were hit? Do we know how many criticals were scored? No, we certainly don't. Your practical situations angus have far too many variables to draw a reliable conclusion.

  • Re : QV (UK)?????????

    07. 23. 2011 05:00


Thebarrel
Originally Posted by ljsevern


QV has the same ability to take a hit as every other BB6. The Submergence is all the same.



has this actually been tested ? and with most of the things u say its like u underestimate the fact of how much speed + turnrate + hitbox actually means

  • Re : QV (UK)?????????

    07. 23. 2011 09:29


killer12347
Originally Posted by Thebarrel

Originally Posted by ljsevern


QV has the same ability to take a hit as every other BB6. The Submergence is all the same.



has this actually been tested ? and with most of the things u say its like u underestimate the fact of how much speed + turnrate + hitbox actually means



+1

He just wants to keep his toy unchanged.

  • Re : QV (UK)?????????

    07. 23. 2011 09:41


heatrr
Clueless much, killer12347?

I have known lukas, among others, for years, and be assured, virtually all the test members trying to make this game better are doing it to better this game for EVERYONE, not for themselves nor the ships that they may have. =.=

  • Re : QV (UK)?????????

    07. 23. 2011 09:47


killer12347
Im not clueless, its just the impression i got.

  • Re : QV (UK)?????????

    07. 23. 2011 09:50


Rehor
Originally Posted by angus725

What's more useful? In game battles telling you an average damage per salvo via calculation, or closed tests were it's all theoretical values which are not likely to be reproduced in a real situation.


Baselines and consistencies.

You're fired.

  • Re : QV (UK)?????????

    07. 23. 2011 09:56


Thebarrel
Originally Posted by heatrr

Clueless much, killer12347?

I have known lukas, among others, for years, and be assured, virtually all the test members trying to make this game better are doing it to better this game for EVERYONE, not for themselves nor the ships that they may have. =.=



do realise lukas is a good player and the ones thats in charge is hopefully working on making the game better but as killer12347 said its the impression he makes in his comments on not seeing how much what i said has an effect on gameplay = why L1 sw is insane and pow and alot of other ships

  • Re : QV (UK)?????????

    07. 23. 2011 10:16


DJDeath
QV, L1, PoW etc. they have all one thing in common: They're very good at farming bad players. And because they're also easy to use (well, PoW not so much, haven't seen a good one in ages), you see it happen more often. That's why you have to judge the ships taking players into consideration who know how to play well and use the advantages of their ships. Otherwise you will have to buff ships that are hard to use, which in turn will make them overpowered in the hands of a good player.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9