What if player B instead pressed spacebar really fast? Would that be considered exploiting?


You, sir, are not the brightest light bulb in the trash can.

Consider that SDE has accepted posts on the forum about NF Fixer.

I'd like to see you try to take legal action. No, really. I'll use NF Fixer in the next game I play, take legal action against me. I could use the laughs.

Then I would have no problem with that. The issue that I'm bringing up makes the playing field unfair. I think that this should be an all or nothing venture. NF Fixer should either be used by all or none.

I guess what i'm saying is that it should either be placed into the game engine, or not used at all.

SDEnternet and Team NF are looking into the legal ramifications right now. So far, it doesn't look all too bright for NF Fixer's future.

That's why I 'ended' the topic like I did. It will soon be deemed either legal or illegal to use by SDEnternet and Team NF. I'd prefer not to be in the kill zone when the banhammer comes down, as I've made a solid legal case regarding it, and am confident that the final decision will reinforce that case.

Sure you can fire it like that, but the second you press any other key, it not long fires, a issue caused by the game not handling key commands efficiently.


*****************************



Explain how use of a program to Repeat a command every 0.5 seconds is "Illegal", the same process can be done by rapidly tapping the spacebar key. Which is humanly possible to do faster than the AA reload time of all the guns in game.


After 5 years and multiple "acceptances" by previous heads of TNF, Even mentioning that being able to fire while turning the guns in rapid succession was how the game was suppose to work. Its a "Fixer" Functions in NF-Fixer in the past (Loading of planes quicker) have been added to the game in the past. (Scroll Wheel to add Planes to selection to load). It should be incorporated into the game, then it will have no point and no one would care about it anymore.

Once again... Read the previous posts. If you haven't read the entire discussion, there isn't really any point posting anything that you expect to be taken seriously.

waiting > NF fixer

Wait. You seriously think that the contract is binding in a court of law? And then you post something about 'being taken seriously'?


jajajaajajajajjajajajajjajajajajajajajaaajajajajjajajjjaaajajajajajajajajajajajajaa
ajjajajajajajajajajajajajajajaajaja
jajajajajajajajajajajajajaja
aja

also, 'legal ramifications' of a utility program for an online video game? ajajaa


And you can't expect anyone to read your previous posts when you write like some kind of cross between an industrial robot, a fake Monty Python sketch about lawyers and the TV Tropes Forum. And you seem to think you're making a
legal case
about
video game rules.




also, deporta AA!

I rarely don't read the entire thread. I read all 8 pages, including your fail of an explanation of how you think things work. Seriously explain what makes you think the Eula of the Game can be used in the due process of law to "punish" people using software that the game owning company has not banned? Come back after you've read some law books. The only way an Eula is used in the court of law is to protect the decisions of the game owning company from being sued from people like you who don't understand the fundamentals of how the justice system works involving agreements such as an Eula or a Terms of Service or other documents that must be accepted to use such a service.

The Eula for example, makes it so if you were banned, you couldn't sue SDE for loss of premium items.
It can't be used to sue a game company for their interpretation of their own rules.

The one and only function of an Eula is setting rules and punishments officially to legally protect the parent company that owns the game.