ID
Password
FlashGuide
FlashGuide
HA Infomation

Suggestions

  Index

  • Remove the No Torp option from World At War rooms

    12. 31. 2013 07:53

Recommend : 15

Telegraph

As the World at War rooms are bb exclusive for the most part just forbid subs from ever entering, like Blitz.
If the general playerbase thinks World at War  should remove the no submarine option, then recommend this thread. It is past the time for World At War to include submarine without discriminating.

War entails RISK, not Molly-Coddling surface ship players.  

Yes I know that NavyField =/= Real Life and this game displays this situational fact everyday. 

Recommend that the No Torp option be removed forever.

CV uses sonar so the argument "we can't see subs" or "we want to use escorts" does not stand. If you are afraid to sail out by yourself, then follow modern military protocol and stay near the carriers.

All that is required is minor behavioral modification and intelligence/strategy application on the part of bb drivers to remain near the sonar equipped surface vessels.

 

  • Re : Remove the No Torp option from World At War rooms

    01. 01. 2014 08:18


fromage
Originally Posted by Cracko

I do think something should be done for allowing SS on WaWs, they also have right to be there. Maybe limiting the insane reload and/or fixing some exp issues would help. These things or other solutions should be discussed but the biasing against SSs is too big.



No one "deserves" anything. This game mode provides the user a choice to cater to one of several different types of play. Popular rooms naturally succeed while unpopular rooms naturally don't. Denying a vast majority of players the option they are most likely to desire is just stupid. In an ironic twist, my case is proven quickly by using the sub-player's most popular complaint: "Torp Enabled rooms never start!" Furthermore, no one is stopping you from leveling your sub crew on an EBB in WaW. That would level some crew and the BO at any given point.

  • Re : Remove the No Torp option from World At War rooms

    01. 01. 2014 18:07


Cracko

Originally Posted by fromage
Originally Posted by Cracko

I do think something should be done for allowing SS on WaWs, they also have right to be there. Maybe limiting the insane reload and/or fixing some exp issues would help. These things or other solutions should be discussed but the biasing against SSs is too big.



No one "deserves" anything. This game mode provides the user a choice to cater to one of several different types of play. Popular rooms naturally succeed while unpopular rooms naturally don't. Denying a vast majority of players the option they are most likely to desire is just stupid. In an ironic twist, my case is proven quickly by using the sub-player's most popular complaint: "Torp Enabled rooms never start!" Furthermore, no one is stopping you from leveling your sub crew on an EBB in WaW. That would level some crew and the BO at any given point.

 

I think users of all classes should be allowed to enjoy WaW exp and there are many things that could be done about that instead a rigid "no". I see many intolerance about SSs, also see SS players saying "i want to play WaW" without giving alternatives.

Just think objectively about it. What is the problem of allowing SS on WaWs?

 

1-You can't see them? Well, you have other SSs in your team, CVs can also carry sonar ... That would involve actually team playing, but people in WaW play just arcade, f for fictory and boom, boom, boom. Is that what people really wants?

 

2-SSs will not shoot between themselves and just evade the other SS and go to farm enemy BBs? Hey, there is a solution for that, fix the exp for SS, give them less exp for sinking BBs and more exp for sinking subs.

 

3-Once a SS got you and noone will scout it you are dead? Hey, you have HHs for that? But of course, people don't use 2 pair of gunners, they are leveling other sailors on those slots ..., oh, then pay the price in battle. Also BBs are very fast in WaW, you can escape .. No time with the insane reload of SS in WaW? Well, limit it !!! Another thing i was suggesting before.

 

In my opinion i think there are options to be discussed and changes to be made, just all need a more open mind :)

  • Re : Remove the No Torp option from World At War rooms

    01. 02. 2014 00:41


fromage

Originally Posted by Cracko

Originally Posted by fromage
Originally Posted by Cracko

I do think something should be done for allowing SS on WaWs, they also have right to be there. Maybe limiting the insane reload and/or fixing some exp issues would help. These things or other solutions should be discussed but the biasing against SSs is too big.



No one "deserves" anything. This game mode provides the user a choice to cater to one of several different types of play. Popular rooms naturally succeed while unpopular rooms naturally don't. Denying a vast majority of players the option they are most likely to desire is just stupid. In an ironic twist, my case is proven quickly by using the sub-player's most popular complaint: "Torp Enabled rooms never start!" Furthermore, no one is stopping you from leveling your sub crew on an EBB in WaW. That would level some crew and the BO at any given point.

 

I think users of all classes should be allowed to enjoy WaW exp and there are many things that could be done about that instead a rigid "no". I see many intolerance about SSs, also see SS players saying "i want to play WaW" without giving alternatives.

Just think objectively about it. What is the problem of allowing SS on WaWs?

 

1-You can't see them? Well, you have other SSs in your team, CVs can also carry sonar ... That would involve actually team playing, but people in WaW play just arcade, f for fictory and boom, boom, boom. Is that what people really wants?

 

2-SSs will not shoot between themselves and just evade the other SS and go to farm enemy BBs? Hey, there is a solution for that, fix the exp for SS, give them less exp for sinking BBs and more exp for sinking subs.

 

3-Once a SS got you and noone will scout it you are dead? Hey, you have HHs for that? But of course, people don't use 2 pair of gunners, they are leveling other sailors on those slots ..., oh, then pay the price in battle. Also BBs are very fast in WaW, you can escape .. No time with the insane reload of SS in WaW? Well, limit it !!! Another thing i was suggesting before.

 

In my opinion i think there are options to be discussed and changes to be made, just all need a more open mind :)

I don't disagree entirely, and I don't come at it from the stance that subs need to be punished because I'm butthurt about their capabilities.

I think the solution is very simple.  Subs and ASW need to be balanced first.  Once they are in their respective niches with appropriate capabilites they will naturally integrate into other game modes and there will be no forcing necessary.

As it stands right now, there is nothing that amply justifies the overall abilities of subs.  Subs don't need tweaks to shift their abilities around from one area to another, they need an overall decrease to fit in their role.  This can include some buffs to compensate for some nerfs, but the compensation can't be even or there was never any balancing.  With that being said, ASW needs an overall decrease as well.  Hedgehogs are insanely overpowered, premium or not.  ASW needs a multi-tiered approach across more levels like every other ship class in the game.  In fact, ASW and SS are basically matched.  But that does not mean they are balanced with other facets of the game (and as long as there is no incentive to play ASW, SS will naturally dominate their counter).

TL;DR - ASW and SS are both overpowered for their niche in the game.  Bring them both down a few pegs and expand ASW laterally.  When everything fits together no one will feel compelled to exclude anything from any game modes.

  • Re : Remove the No Torp option from World At War rooms

    01. 02. 2014 03:40


zakdorn

Rec'd.

Only playing GB with sub gets boring after some time.

  • Re : Remove the No Torp option from World At War rooms

    01. 02. 2014 04:11


Krazysride

Originally Posted by PictWarrior1

I've been trying to suggest a solution for a long time now.  Allow escorts in WaW and subs will be balanced.  Yes the CV can carry sonar (although it shouldn't) but how many CVs are up on the front line with the BBs? 


lmao only one that i know is Krazy enough to do that lol.

  • Re : Remove the No Torp option from World At War rooms

    01. 02. 2014 05:44


Telegraph

Subs ARE THE BALANCE opposed to high level bb.

Remove the No Torp option.

Submarines do not have agility or firepower of capitol ships at level.  Submarines DOES NOT HAVE unlimited air supply for perpetual submersion. Submarines are limited by speed reduction while submerged as well as loss in maneuverability.

Remove the No Torp option.

However, if NavyField wants to remain one sided by allowing the No Torp option, then they are just as discriminatory as the old United States with "Whites Only" signs.
 
Remove the No Torp option. 

  • Re : Remove the No Torp option from World At War rooms

    01. 02. 2014 06:29


Mezak76

Originally Posted by Telegraph

Originally Posted by PictWarrior1

I've been trying to suggest a solution for a long time now.  Allow escorts in WaW and subs will be balanced.  Yes the CV can carry sonar (although it shouldn't) but how many CVs are up on the front line with the BBs? 



With great reward should also come great risk. As it is, no risk from anything but cv and bb. That is not really World at War is it?

Remove the No Torp option.




which is the great risk for SS if mostly cant be detected at all?

  • Re : Remove the No Torp option from World At War rooms

    01. 02. 2014 06:49


Mezak76

Originally Posted by zakdorn

Rec'd.

Only playing GB with sub gets boring after some time.



For GB players get boring to been spoted, shooted and sunk without notice.

  • Re : Remove the No Torp option from World At War rooms

    01. 02. 2014 08:23


fromage

Originally Posted by Telegraph

Subs ARE THE BALANCE opposed to high level bb.

Remove the No Torp option.

Submarines do not have agility or firepower of capitol ships at level.  Submarines DOES NOT HAVE unlimited air supply for perpetual submersion. Submarines are limited by speed reduction while submerged as well as loss in maneuverability.

Remove the No Torp option.

However, if NavyField wants to remain one sided by allowing the No Torp option, then they are just as discriminatory as the old United States with "Whites Only" signs.
 
Remove the No Torp option. 

1. Balancing subs will still leave them an effective counter to BBs.  Bear in mind that BBs are also countered by BBs.

2. Start your own games and stop whining.  There is an option which allows torps to be included.  If it doesn't start, the majority of players online do not share your opinion.

  • Re : Remove the No Torp option from World At War rooms

    01. 02. 2014 12:17


jacopo

Originally Posted by Cracko

Seein how last thread about this went, prepare yourself :p

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NTMcPXNreis



WTF did i just watch?

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10